Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Obesity (ACE-Obesity): an overview of the ACE approach, economic methods and cost results

Authors: Rob Carter, Marj Moodie, Alison Markwick, Anne Magnus, Theo Vos, Boyd Swinburn, Michele M Haby

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the ACE-Obesity study was to determine the economic credentials of interventions which aim to prevent unhealthy weight gain in children and adolescents. We have reported elsewhere on the modelled effectiveness of 13 obesity prevention interventions in children. In this paper, we report on the cost results and associated methods together with the innovative approach to priority setting that underpins the ACE-Obesity study.

Methods

The Assessing Cost Effectiveness (ACE) approach combines technical rigour with 'due process' to facilitate evidence-based policy analysis. Technical rigour was achieved through use of standardised evaluation methods, a research team that assembles best available evidence and extensive uncertainty analysis. Cost estimates were based on pathway analysis, with resource usage estimated for the interventions and their 'current practice' comparator, as well as associated cost offsets. Due process was achieved through involvement of stakeholders, consensus decisions informed by briefing papers and 2nd stage filter analysis that captures broader factors that influence policy judgements in addition to cost-effectiveness results. The 2nd stage filters agreed by stakeholders were 'equity', 'strength of the evidence', 'feasibility of implementation', 'acceptability to stakeholders', 'sustainability' and 'potential for side-effects'.

Results

The intervention costs varied considerably, both in absolute terms (from cost saving [6 interventions] to in excess of AUD50m per annum) and when expressed as a 'cost per child' estimate (from <AUD1.0 [reduction of TV advertising of high fat foods/high sugar drinks] to AUD31,553 [laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbidly obese adolescents]). High costs per child reflected cost structure, target population and/or under-utilisation.

Conclusion

The use of consistent methods enables valid comparison of potential intervention costs and cost-offsets for each of the interventions. ACE-Obesity informs policy-makers about cost-effectiveness, health impact, affordability and 2nd stage filters for important options for preventing unhealthy weight gain in children. In related articles cost-effectiveness results and second stage filter considerations for each intervention assessed will be presented and analysed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stanley L, Lopez A: The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. 2007, Canberra: AIHW; Report No: PHE 82 Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stanley L, Lopez A: The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. 2007, Canberra: AIHW; Report No: PHE 82
2.
go back to reference Public Health Group, Department of Human Services: Victorian Burden of Disease Study. Mortality and morbidity in 2001. 2005, Melbourne: Department of Human Services Public Health Group, Department of Human Services: Victorian Burden of Disease Study. Mortality and morbidity in 2001. 2005, Melbourne: Department of Human Services
3.
go back to reference Swinburn B, Gill T, Kumanyika S: Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obes Rev. 2005, 6: 23-33. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00184.x.CrossRefPubMed Swinburn B, Gill T, Kumanyika S: Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obes Rev. 2005, 6: 23-33. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00184.x.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Carter R, Stone C, Vos T, Hocking J, Mihalopoulos C, Peacock S, et al: Trial of program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to assist cancer control planning in Australia. 2000, Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care Carter R, Stone C, Vos T, Hocking J, Mihalopoulos C, Peacock S, et al: Trial of program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to assist cancer control planning in Australia. 2000, Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care
5.
go back to reference Lim S, Vos T, Peeters A, Liew D, McNeil J: Is prescribing statins according to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme guidelines cost-effective?. Med J Aust. 2001, 175: 459-64.PubMed Lim S, Vos T, Peeters A, Liew D, McNeil J: Is prescribing statins according to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme guidelines cost-effective?. Med J Aust. 2001, 175: 459-64.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Haby M, Carter R, Mihalopoulos C, Magnus A, Andrews G, Vos T: Assessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) - Mental Health: Introduction to the study and methods. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2004, 38: 569-78. 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01420.x. Haby M, Carter R, Mihalopoulos C, Magnus A, Andrews G, Vos T: Assessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) - Mental Health: Introduction to the study and methods. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2004, 38: 569-78. 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01420.x.
7.
go back to reference Vos T, Haby M, Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Andrews G, Carter R: Assessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) - Mental health: Helping policy makers prioritize and plan health services. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2005, 39: 701-12. 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01654.x.CrossRef Vos T, Haby M, Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Andrews G, Carter R: Assessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) - Mental health: Helping policy makers prioritize and plan health services. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2005, 39: 701-12. 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01654.x.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haby M, Vos T, Carter R, Moodie M, Markwick A, Magnus A, et al: A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 1463-75. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803469.CrossRef Haby M, Vos T, Carter R, Moodie M, Markwick A, Magnus A, et al: A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 1463-75. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803469.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Carter R, Vos T, Moodie M, Haby M, Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C: Priority setting in health: origins, description and application of the Australian Assessing Cost-Effectiveness Initiative. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2008, 8 (6): 593-617. 10.1586/14737167.8.6.593.CrossRef Carter R, Vos T, Moodie M, Haby M, Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C: Priority setting in health: origins, description and application of the Australian Assessing Cost-Effectiveness Initiative. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2008, 8 (6): 593-617. 10.1586/14737167.8.6.593.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, eds: Priority setting: The health care debate. 1996, Chichester, England, Wiley and Sons Coast J, Donovan J, Frankel S, eds: Priority setting: The health care debate. 1996, Chichester, England, Wiley and Sons
11.
go back to reference Coulter A, Ham C, eds: The global challenge of health care rationing. 2000, Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia Coulter A, Ham C, eds: The global challenge of health care rationing. 2000, Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia
12.
go back to reference Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 1997, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2 Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 1997, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2
13.
go back to reference Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M, eds: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 1996, New York: Oxford University Press Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M, eds: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 1996, New York: Oxford University Press
14.
go back to reference Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Carter R: Evaluation of preventive health interventions: Impact on production gains. Report to Victorian Department of Treasury and Finance. 2008, Melbourne: Deakin Health Economics Unit Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Carter R: Evaluation of preventive health interventions: Impact on production gains. Report to Victorian Department of Treasury and Finance. 2008, Melbourne: Deakin Health Economics Unit
15.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Health expenditure bulletin series. 1999, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Health expenditure bulletin series. 1999, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
17.
go back to reference Palisade Corporation: @RISK Advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets (computer program) Version 4.0. Newfield, New York. 2001 Palisade Corporation: @RISK Advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets (computer program) Version 4.0. Newfield, New York. 2001
18.
go back to reference Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment: Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada. 1997, Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) Ottawa, 2 Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment: Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada. 1997, Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) Ottawa, 2
19.
go back to reference Haby M, Vos T, Carter R, Moodie M, Markwick A, Magnus A, et al: Response to Segal and Dalziel (letter). Int J Obes. 2007, 31: 1185-10.1038/sj.ijo.0803617.CrossRef Haby M, Vos T, Carter R, Moodie M, Markwick A, Magnus A, et al: Response to Segal and Dalziel (letter). Int J Obes. 2007, 31: 1185-10.1038/sj.ijo.0803617.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Segal L, Dalziel K: Economic evaluation of obesity interventions in children and adults (letter). Int J Obes. 2007, 31: 1183-4. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803557.CrossRef Segal L, Dalziel K: Economic evaluation of obesity interventions in children and adults (letter). Int J Obes. 2007, 31: 1183-4. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803557.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing: National Obesity Taskforce. Healthy Weight 2008 - Australia's Future - The National Action Agenda for Children and Young People and their Families. Canberra. 2003 Department of Health and Ageing: National Obesity Taskforce. Healthy Weight 2008 - Australia's Future - The National Action Agenda for Children and Young People and their Families. Canberra. 2003
Metadata
Title
Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Obesity (ACE-Obesity): an overview of the ACE approach, economic methods and cost results
Authors
Rob Carter
Marj Moodie
Alison Markwick
Anne Magnus
Theo Vos
Boyd Swinburn
Michele M Haby
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-419

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Public Health 1/2009 Go to the issue