Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Research article

The dimensions of responsiveness of a health system: a Taiwanese perspective

Authors: Chih-Cheng Hsu, Likwang Chen, Yu-Whuei Hu, Winnie Yip, Chen-Chun Shu

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Responsiveness is an indicator used to measure how well a health system performs relative to non-health aspects. This study assessed whether seven dimensions proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to measure responsiveness (dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, prompt attention, social support, basic amenities, and choices of providers) are applicable in evaluating the health system of Taiwan.

Methods

A key informant survey and focus group research were used in this study. The translated WHO proposed questionnaire was sent to 205 nominated key informants by mail, and 132 (64.4%) were returned. We used principal component analysis to extract factors. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the total score and the extracted factors. A qualitative content analysis was also carried out in focus group research.

Results

Principal component analysis produced five factors (respect, access, confidentiality, basic amenities, and social support) that explained 63.5% of the total variances. These five factors demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and four of them (except social support) were significantly correlated with the total responsiveness score. The focus group interviews revealed health providers' communication ability and medical ethics were also highly appraised by Taiwanese.

Conclusion

When the performance of a health system is to be evaluated, elements of responsiveness proposed by WHO may have to be tailored to fit different cultural backgrounds. Four key features illustrate the uniqueness of Taiwanese perspectives: the idea of autonomy may not be conceptualized, prompt attention and choice of providers are on the same track, social support during care is trivially correlated to the total responsiveness score, and accountability of health providers is deemed essential to a health system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murray CJL, Frenk J: A WHO Framework for Health System Performance Assessment. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.6. 1999, Geneva: World Health Organization Murray CJL, Frenk J: A WHO Framework for Health System Performance Assessment. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.6. 1999, Geneva: World Health Organization
2.
go back to reference de Silva A: A Framework for Measuring Responsiveness. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.32. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization de Silva A: A Framework for Measuring Responsiveness. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.32. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
3.
go back to reference WHO: The World Health Report 2000. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization WHO: The World Health Report 2000. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
4.
go back to reference Gakidou E, Murray CJL, Frenk J: Measuring Preferences on Health System Performance Assessment. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.20. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization Gakidou E, Murray CJL, Frenk J: Measuring Preferences on Health System Performance Assessment. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.20. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
5.
go back to reference Darby C, Valentine N, Murray CJL, de Silva A: World Health Organization (WHO): Strategy on Measuring Responsiveness. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.23. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization Darby C, Valentine N, Murray CJL, de Silva A: World Health Organization (WHO): Strategy on Measuring Responsiveness. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.23. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
6.
go back to reference Brock D: Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics. 1993, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Brock D: Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics. 1993, Cambridge University PressCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beauchamp T, Childress J: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1989, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3 Beauchamp T, Childress J: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1989, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3
9.
go back to reference Bernhart MH, Wiadnyana IG, Wihardjo H, Pohan I: Patient satisfaction in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48 (8): 989-996. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00376-1.CrossRefPubMed Bernhart MH, Wiadnyana IG, Wihardjo H, Pohan I: Patient satisfaction in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48 (8): 989-996. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00376-1.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gilson L, Alilio M, Heggenhougen K: Community satisfaction with primary health care services: an evaluation undertaken in the Morogoro region of Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 1994, 39 (6): 767-780. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90038-8.CrossRefPubMed Gilson L, Alilio M, Heggenhougen K: Community satisfaction with primary health care services: an evaluation undertaken in the Morogoro region of Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 1994, 39 (6): 767-780. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90038-8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference de Silva A, Valentine N: Measuring Responsiveness: Results of a Key Informants Survey in 35 Cournties. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.21. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization de Silva A, Valentine N: Measuring Responsiveness: Results of a Key Informants Survey in 35 Cournties. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.21. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
12.
go back to reference Valentine N, de Silva A, Murray CJL: Estimating Responsiveness Level and Distribution for 191 Countries: Methods and Results. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.22. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization Valentine N, de Silva A, Murray CJL: Estimating Responsiveness Level and Distribution for 191 Countries: Methods and Results. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.22. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization
13.
go back to reference Almeida C, Braveman P, Gold MR, Szwarcwald CL, Ribeiro JM, Miglionico A, Millar JS, Porto S, Costa NR, Rubio VO, Segall M, Starfield B, Travessos C, Uga A, Valente J, Viacava F: Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1692-1697. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04825-X.CrossRefPubMed Almeida C, Braveman P, Gold MR, Szwarcwald CL, Ribeiro JM, Miglionico A, Millar JS, Porto S, Costa NR, Rubio VO, Segall M, Starfield B, Travessos C, Uga A, Valente J, Viacava F: Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1692-1697. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04825-X.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Houweling TA, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP: World Health Report 2000: inequality index and socioeconomic inequalities in mortality. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1671-1672. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04829-7.CrossRefPubMed Houweling TA, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP: World Health Report 2000: inequality index and socioeconomic inequalities in mortality. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1671-1672. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04829-7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Navarro V: Assessment of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2000, 356 (9241): 1598-1601. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03139-1.CrossRefPubMed Navarro V: Assessment of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2000, 356 (9241): 1598-1601. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03139-1.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nord E: Measures of goal attainment and performance in the World Health Report 2000: a brief, critical consumer guide. Health Policy. 2002, 59 (3): 183-191. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00172-5.CrossRefPubMed Nord E: Measures of goal attainment and performance in the World Health Report 2000: a brief, critical consumer guide. Health Policy. 2002, 59 (3): 183-191. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00172-5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Blendon RJ, Kim M, Benson JM: The public versus the World Health Organization on health system performance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001, 20 (3): 10-20. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.10.CrossRef Blendon RJ, Kim M, Benson JM: The public versus the World Health Organization on health system performance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001, 20 (3): 10-20. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Editorial: Why rank countries by health performance?. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1633-10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04853-4. Editorial: Why rank countries by health performance?. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9269): 1633-10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04853-4.
19.
go back to reference Navarro V: The new conventional wisdom: an evaluation of the WHO report, Health Systems: Improving Performance. Int J Health Serv. 2001, 31 (1): 23-33. 10.2190/3LM8-A37Q-FKJ4-TE0R.CrossRefPubMed Navarro V: The new conventional wisdom: an evaluation of the WHO report, Health Systems: Improving Performance. Int J Health Serv. 2001, 31 (1): 23-33. 10.2190/3LM8-A37Q-FKJ4-TE0R.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bureau of National Health Insurance: National Health Insurance Annual Statistical Report 2002. 2003, Bureau of National Health Insurance, Taipei, Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance: National Health Insurance Annual Statistical Report 2002. 2003, Bureau of National Health Insurance, Taipei, Taiwan
21.
go back to reference Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Villanueva M, Bendib L, Celik C, Sadana R, Valentine N, Ortiz J, Tandon A, Salomon J, Cao Y, Jun XW, Ozaltin E, Mathers C, Murray CJL: WHO Multi-Country Survey Study on Health and Responsiveness 2000–2001. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.37. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organization Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Villanueva M, Bendib L, Celik C, Sadana R, Valentine N, Ortiz J, Tandon A, Salomon J, Cao Y, Jun XW, Ozaltin E, Mathers C, Murray CJL: WHO Multi-Country Survey Study on Health and Responsiveness 2000–2001. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No.37. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organization
22.
go back to reference Groenewegen PP, Kerssens JJ, Sixma HJ, van der Eijk I, Boerma WG: What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005, 5 (1): 16-10.1186/1472-6963-5-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Groenewegen PP, Kerssens JJ, Sixma HJ, van der Eijk I, Boerma WG: What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005, 5 (1): 16-10.1186/1472-6963-5-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The dimensions of responsiveness of a health system: a Taiwanese perspective
Authors
Chih-Cheng Hsu
Likwang Chen
Yu-Whuei Hu
Winnie Yip
Chen-Chun Shu
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-72

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

BMC Public Health 1/2006 Go to the issue