Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research article

What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views

Authors: Peter P Groenewegen, Jan J Kerssens, Herman J Sixma, Ingrid van der Eijk, Wienke GW Boerma

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Quality of care from the perspective of users is increasingly used in evaluating health care performance. Going beyond satisfaction studies, quality of care from the users' perspective is conceptualised in two dimensions: the importance users attach to aspects of care and their actual experience with these aspects. It is well established that health care systems differ in performance. The question in this article is whether there are also differences in what people in different health care systems view as important aspects of health care quality. The aim is to describe and explain international differences in the importance that health care users attach to different aspects of health care.

Methods

Data were used from different studies that all used a version of the QUOTE-questionnaire that measures user views of health care quality in two dimensions: the importance that users attach to aspects of care and their actual experience. Data from 12 European countries and 5133 individuals were used. They were analysed using multi-level analysis.

Results

Although most of the variations in importance people attach to aspects of health care is located at the individual level, there are also differences between countries. The ranking of aspects shows similarities. 'My GP should always take me seriously' was in nearly all countries ranked first, while an item about waiting time in the GP's office was always ranked lowest.

Conclusion

Differences between countries in how health care users value different aspects of care are difficult to explain. Further theorising should take into account that importance and performance ratings are positively related, that people compare their experiences with those of others, and that general and instrumental values might be related through the institutions of the health care system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference OECD: OECD Health Data. Electronic data file, release 2002. 2002, Paris: OECD OECD: OECD Health Data. Electronic data file, release 2002. 2002, Paris: OECD
2.
go back to reference WHO: World health report 2000. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organisation WHO: World health report 2000. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organisation
3.
go back to reference Blendon RJ, Leitman R, Morrison I, Donelan K: Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Affairs. 1990, 9 (summer): 185-192. 10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185.CrossRefPubMed Blendon RJ, Leitman R, Morrison I, Donelan K: Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Affairs. 1990, 9 (summer): 185-192. 10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schoen C, Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Osborn R: Comparison of health care system views and experiences in five nations, 2001. 2001, New York Commonwealth Fund Schoen C, Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Osborn R: Comparison of health care system views and experiences in five nations, 2001. 2001, New York Commonwealth Fund
5.
go back to reference Coulter A, Cleary PD: Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs. 2001, 20: 244-252. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.244.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A, Cleary PD: Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs. 2001, 20: 244-252. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.244.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Coulter A, Magee H: The European patient of the future. 2003, Maidenhead: Open University Press Coulter A, Magee H: The European patient of the future. 2003, Maidenhead: Open University Press
7.
go back to reference Kerssens JJ, Groenewegen PP, Sixma HJ, Boerma WGW, Van der Eijk I: Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004, 82: 106-114.PubMedPubMedCentral Kerssens JJ, Groenewegen PP, Sixma HJ, Boerma WGW, Van der Eijk I: Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004, 82: 106-114.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Mooney G, Wiseman V: World health report 2000: challenging a world view. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2000, 5: 198-199. Mooney G, Wiseman V: World health report 2000: challenging a world view. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2000, 5: 198-199.
9.
go back to reference Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Ribacke M, Spenser T, Szécsényi J: Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Family Practice. 1999, 16: 4-11. 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.CrossRefPubMed Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Ribacke M, Spenser T, Szécsényi J: Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Family Practice. 1999, 16: 4-11. 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen van C, Peters L: Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expectations. 1998, 1: 82-95. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x.CrossRefPubMed Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen van C, Peters L: Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expectations. 1998, 1: 82-95. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hedström P, Swedberg R, (eds): Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. 1998, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Hedström P, Swedberg R, (eds): Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. 1998, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12.
go back to reference Campen van C, Sixma H, Kerssens JJ, Peter L: Assessing Non-institutionalized Asthma and COPD Patients' Priorities and Perceptions of Quality of Health Care; The Development of the Quote-CNSLD Instrument. J Asthma. 1997, 34: 531-538.CrossRef Campen van C, Sixma H, Kerssens JJ, Peter L: Assessing Non-institutionalized Asthma and COPD Patients' Priorities and Perceptions of Quality of Health Care; The Development of the Quote-CNSLD Instrument. J Asthma. 1997, 34: 531-538.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference SCOPE: Common evaluation protocol. Introducing and evaluating the use of health outcome measures in primary care for elderly people. 1998, Biomedic & Health Programme of the European Communities, Brussels SCOPE: Common evaluation protocol. Introducing and evaluating the use of health outcome measures in primary care for elderly people. 1998, Biomedic & Health Programme of the European Communities, Brussels
14.
go back to reference Van der Eijk I, Sixma H, Smeets T, Veloso FT, Odes S, Montague S, Fomaciari G, Moum B, Stockbrugger R, Russel M, European Collaborative Study Group on IBD: Quality of health care in inflammatory bowel disease: development of a reliable questionnaire (Quote-IBD) and first results. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001, 96: 3329-3336. 10.1016/S0002-9270(01)03896-5.CrossRefPubMed Van der Eijk I, Sixma H, Smeets T, Veloso FT, Odes S, Montague S, Fomaciari G, Moum B, Stockbrugger R, Russel M, European Collaborative Study Group on IBD: Quality of health care in inflammatory bowel disease: development of a reliable questionnaire (Quote-IBD) and first results. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001, 96: 3329-3336. 10.1016/S0002-9270(01)03896-5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Calnan S, Sixma H, Calnan M: Quality of local authority occupational therapy services: developing an instrument to measure the user's perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000, 63: 155-162.CrossRef Calnan S, Sixma H, Calnan M: Quality of local authority occupational therapy services: developing an instrument to measure the user's perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000, 63: 155-162.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boerma WGW, Schellevis FG, Rousovitch V: Going ahead with primary care and general practice in Belarus. 2002, Utrecht: NIVEL Boerma WGW, Schellevis FG, Rousovitch V: Going ahead with primary care and general practice in Belarus. 2002, Utrecht: NIVEL
17.
go back to reference Searle SR, Casella G, McGullogh CE: Variance components. 1992, New York: WileyCrossRef Searle SR, Casella G, McGullogh CE: Variance components. 1992, New York: WileyCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Snijders T, Bosker R: Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. 1999, London: Sage Snijders T, Bosker R: Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. 1999, London: Sage
19.
go back to reference Goldstein H: Multilevel Statistical Models. 1995, New York: Halsted Press Goldstein H: Multilevel Statistical Models. 1995, New York: Halsted Press
20.
go back to reference Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ: Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004, 57: 785-94. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.CrossRefPubMed Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ: Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004, 57: 785-94. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fox JG, Storms DM: A different approach to sociodemographic predictors of satisfaction with health care. Soc Sci Med. 1981, 15A: 557-564. Fox JG, Storms DM: A different approach to sociodemographic predictors of satisfaction with health care. Soc Sci Med. 1981, 15A: 557-564.
22.
go back to reference Weiss GL: Patient satisfaction with primary medical care: evaluation of sociodemographic and predispositional factors. Medical Care. 1988, 26: 383-392.CrossRefPubMed Weiss GL: Patient satisfaction with primary medical care: evaluation of sociodemographic and predispositional factors. Medical Care. 1988, 26: 383-392.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ovretveit J: Health service quality: an introduction to quality methods for health services. 1992, London: Blackwell Ovretveit J: Health service quality: an introduction to quality methods for health services. 1992, London: Blackwell
24.
go back to reference Hofstede G: Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. 1983, Beverly Hills: Sage Hofstede G: Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. 1983, Beverly Hills: Sage
25.
go back to reference Hofstede G: Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. 1991, London: McGraw-Hill Hofstede G: Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. 1991, London: McGraw-Hill
26.
go back to reference Payer L: Medicine and culture: varieties of treatment in the United States, England, West Germany, and France. 1988, New York: Henry Holt Payer L: Medicine and culture: varieties of treatment in the United States, England, West Germany, and France. 1988, New York: Henry Holt
27.
go back to reference Festinger L: A theory of cognitive dissonance. 1957, Evanston: Row, Peterson Festinger L: A theory of cognitive dissonance. 1957, Evanston: Row, Peterson
28.
go back to reference Helman C: Culture, health and illness. 1994, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman Helman C: Culture, health and illness. 1994, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman
29.
go back to reference Philipsen H: Gezondheidszorg als project en bejegening. 1988, Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht Philipsen H: Gezondheidszorg als project en bejegening. 1988, Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht
30.
go back to reference Arts W, Gelissen J: Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. J Eur Soc Policy. 2002, 12: 137-158.CrossRef Arts W, Gelissen J: Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. J Eur Soc Policy. 2002, 12: 137-158.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Boerma WGW: Profiles of general practice in Europe: an international study of variation in the tasks of general practitioners. 2003, Utrecht: NIVEL Boerma WGW: Profiles of general practice in Europe: an international study of variation in the tasks of general practitioners. 2003, Utrecht: NIVEL
Metadata
Title
What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views
Authors
Peter P Groenewegen
Jan J Kerssens
Herman J Sixma
Ingrid van der Eijk
Wienke GW Boerma
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-16

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

BMC Health Services Research 1/2005 Go to the issue