Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Possible relation between maternal consumption of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and birth weight – time trends in a population

Authors: Jacob Holter Grundt, Jakob Nakling, Geir Egil Eide, Trond Markestad

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2012

Abstract

Background

High birth weight (BW) is a risk factor for later obesity. In Norway, mean BW and proportion of large newborns increased from 1989 to 2000 and subsequently decreased to the 1989 level by 2010. The purpose of the study was to explore causes of this temporary increase.

Methods

From a regional prospective database pregnancy and newborn data were extracted for all 33088 singleton pregnancies resulting in live infants born at term without malformations during 1989–2010. Trends in BW, ponderal index and proportion of large newborns were related to individual prenatal exposures, including pre-pregnancy body mass index (PP-BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) for the years 2001–2010, and thereafter related ecologically to national population data on consumption of nutrients and physical activity.

Results

For the regional cohort mean (standard deviation) BW increased from 3580 (453) grams in 1989/90 to 3633 (493) grams in 2001/02 (p<0.001), and decreased to 3583 (481) grams in 2009/10 (p<0.001). The proportion with BW>4500 grams increased from 2.6% to 4.8% (p<0.001) and subsequently decreased to 3.3% (p=0.002). The trends remained after adjustment for relevant exposures. For the years 2001/02 to 2009/10 (n= 15240) mean (SD) PP-BMI increased from 24.36 (4.44) to 24.85 (5.02) kg/m² (p<0.001) while GWG decreased from 14.79 (5.85) to 13.86 (5.79) kg (p<0.001). The estimated net effect of changes in PP-BMI, GWG and other known exposures was a 6 grams reduction in BW from 2001/02 to 2009/10, leaving 44 grams reduction unexplained. National consumption of major nutrients did not change, but consumption of sucrose, in large part as sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) changed in parallel to the BW trends.

Conclusion

The temporary increase in BW and large babies in the regional cohort was identical to that reported for Norway. Individual level data on known pregnancy related predictors for BW could not explain these changes, but the parallel time trend in national consumption of sucrose, in particular as SSB, may lend support to a hypothesis that intake of sugar may have a direct effect on BW and infant body proportions independent of effects through PP-BMI and GWG.

Available only for authorised users

Yu ZB, Han SP, Zhu GZ, Zhu C, Wang XJ, Cao XG, et al: Birth weight and subsequent risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2011, 12: 525-542. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00867.x.CrossRefPubMed

McMillen IC, Robinson JS: Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005, 85: 571-633. 10.1152/physrev.00053.2003.CrossRefPubMed

Heerwagen MJ, Miller MR, Barbour LA, Friedman JE: Maternal obesity and fetal metabolic programming: a fertile epigenetic soil. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010, 299: R711-R722. 10.1152/ajpregu.00310.2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

[Birth weight - facts. Figure 1: Mean birth weight in live born children 1967–2008]. 2009, The Norwegian National Institute of Public Health. 9-11-2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation, The Norwegian Medical Birth Registry

[Birth weight - proportion with low and high birth weight: Figure 2: Proportion of children with high birth weight (4500 grams or higher)]. 2011, The Norwegian National Institute of Public Health. 9-11-2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation, The Norwegian Medical Birth Registry

Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P, Jørgensen NP, Løkvik B: [Normal range curves for BPD and MAD]. 1983, Norway, Scand: Medical a/s Drammen. Ref Type: Report

Ponderal index Wikipedia: 24-7-0012. 2012, Ref Type: Online Source

[The development in Norwegian diet 2010. Food availability statistics and consumer surveys]. IS-1873: Oslo, Norway. 2011, The Norwegian Directorate for Health. Ref Type, Report

Mørk E, Willand-Evensen E. [Household Consumption - A comparison of The Consumer Survey and The National Accounts]. -73: Statistics Norway. 2004, Report: Ref Type

10.

Gustavsen GW: [Aggregate demand for carbonated beverages - Effects of tax changes in households with different consumption levels]. -13. 2004, Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Ref Type: Report, Oslo, Norway

11.

[Sales figures, Carbonated beverages]: he Norwegian Brewers and Beverage Producers Association. Norway, he Norwegian Brewers and Beverage Producers Association. 15-1-2012. Ref Type: Electronic Citation

12.

Clausen T, Djurovic S, Henriksen T: Dyslipidemia in early second trimester is mainly a feature of women with early onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2001, 108: 1081-1087.PubMed

13.

Siega-Riz AM, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Von HA, Hamer R, Torgersen L, et al: Nutrient and food group intakes of women with and without bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1346-1355.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Johansson L, Solvoll K. [Norkost 1997. Nationwide nutritional survey among men and women aged 16–79 years. Report nr. 2/1999]: Norwegian national council on nutrition and physical activity. 1999, Ref Type, Report

15.

Anderssen SA, Engeland A, Sogaard AJ, Nystad W, Graff-Iversen S, Holme I: Changes in physical activity behavior and the development of body mass index during the last 30 years in Norway. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008, 18: 309-317. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00645.x.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Royston P, Sauerbrei W: Multivariable Model-building. 2008, A pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables, John Wiley & Sons LtdCrossRef

17.

Kramer MS, Morin I, Yang H, Platt RW, Usher R, McNamara H, et al: Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J Pediatr. 2002, 141: 538-542. 10.1067/mpd.2002.128029.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Nohr EA, Vaeth M, Baker JL, Sorensen TI, Olsen J, Rasmussen KM: Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1750-1759.PubMed

19.

Droyvold WB, Nilsen TI, Kruger O, Holmen TL, Krokstad S, Midthjell K, et al: Change in height, weight and body mass index: Longitudinal data from the HUNT Study in Norway. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006, 30: 935-939. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803178.CrossRef

20.

Reas DL, Nygard JF, Svensson E, Sorensen T, Sandanger I: Changes in body mass index by age, gender, and socio-economic status among a cohort of Norwegian men and women (1990–2001). BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 269-10.1186/1471-2458-7-269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Health Interview Survey 2008. Figure: Prevalence of obesity among women, by age. 1998, 2002, 2005, 2008. 2008, 15-1-2012. Ref Type: Electronic Citation, Statistics Norway . 2009. Statistics Norway

22.

Ananth CV, Wen SW: Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Semin Perinatol. 2002, 26: 260-267. 10.1053/sper.2002.34772.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Bell R: Trends in birthweight in the north of England. Hum Fertil (Camb ). 2008, 11: 1-8.CrossRef

24.

Maher J, Macfarlane A: Trends in live births and birthweight by social class, marital status and mother's age, 1976–2000. Health Stat Q. 2004, : 34-42.

25.

Lahmann PH, Wills RA, Coory M: Trends in birth size and macrosomia in Queensland, Australia, from 1988 to 2005. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009, 23: 533-541. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01075.x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Surkan PJ, Hsieh CC, Johansson AL, Dickman PW, Cnattingius S: Reasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 104: 720-726. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000141442.59573.cd.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Jährig K, Jährig D, Voight M: Krentz H: [Trends in Anthropometric Data for Pregnant Women and Birth Weight in Germany - Is the Prevalence of Obesity in Pregnant Women on the Increase?]. Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin. 2009, 34: 15-18.CrossRef

28.

Donahue SM, Kleinman KP, Gillman MW, Oken E: Trends in birth weight and gestational length among singleton term births in the United States: 1990–2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 115: 357-364. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cbd5f5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Zhang X, Joseph KS, Kramer MS: Decreased term and postterm birthweight in the United States: impact of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 203: 124-127.PubMed

30.

Bennis M, Gottvall K, Stephansson O: [Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants. The Swedish Medical Birth Register 1973–2009. 2012, Assisted reproduction, treatment 1991–2008]. Edited by The National Board of Health and Welfare, Socialstyrelsen 2011-3-19. 2011. Official Statistics of Sweden. Statistics - Health and Medical Care, 15-1.

31.

Schiessl B, Beyerlein A: Lack N, von KR: Temporal trends in pregnancy weight gain and birth weight in Bavaria 2000–2007: slightly decreasing birth weight with increasing weight gain in pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2009, 37: 374-379.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Orskou J, Henriksen TB, Kesmodel U, Secher NJ: Maternal characteristics and lifestyle factors and the risk of delivering high birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 102: 115-120. 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00402-2.PubMed

33.

Lackman F, Capewell V: Richardson B, daSilva O, Gagnon R: The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 184: 946-953. 10.1067/mob.2001.111719.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Morken NH, Kallen K, Jacobsson B: Fetal growth and onset of delivery: a nationwide population-based study of preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 195: 154-161. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.019.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Gurung T, Smith WC, Bhattacharya S: Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women–systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2009, 10: 28-35. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00537.x.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM: Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002. J Perinatol. 2005, 25: 569-576. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211330.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, Russell R, Bettegowda VR, Dolan S, et al: Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol. 2006, 30: 8-15. 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, Popkin BM, Chaloupka FJ, Thompson JW, et al: The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 1599-1605. 10.1056/NEJMhpr0905723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Innovation T, The 2009 UK Soft Drinks Report.: British Soft Drinks Association. 2009, Report: Ref Type

40.

Hector D, Rangan A, Louie J, Flood V, Gill T: Soft Drinks, Weight Status and Health: A Review. Sydney. 2009, A NSW Centre for Public Health Nutrition (now known as Cluster for Public Health Nutrition, Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney) project for NSW Health

41.

[Soft drink sales statistics]: Swedish Breweries. 15-1-2012. Ref Type: Electronic Citation. 2010, Swedish Breweries: Edited by Swedish Breweries

42.

Bleich SN, Wang YC, Wang Y, Gortmaker SL: Increasing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among US adults: 1988–1994 to 1999–2004. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 372-381.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Barquera S, Hernandez-Barrera L, Tolentino ML, Espinosa J, Ng SW, Rivera JA, et al: Energy intake from beverages is increasing among Mexican adolescents and adults. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 2454-2461. 10.3945/jn.108.092163.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Moses RG, Luebcke M, Davis WS, Coleman KJ, Tapsell LC, Petocz P, et al: Effect of a low-glycemic-index diet during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 807-812.PubMed

45.

Louie JC, Brand-Miller JC, Markovic TP, Ross GP, Moses RG: Glycemic index and pregnancy: a systematic literature review. J Nutr Metab. 2010, 201: 282464-

46.

Phelan S, Hart C, Phipps M, Abrams B, Schaffner A, Adams A, et al: Maternal behaviors during pregnancy impact offspring obesity risk. Exp Diabetes Res. 2011, 201 (1): 985139-

47.

Study HAPO: Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR et al.: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 1991-2002.CrossRef

48.

Ong KK, Diderholm B, Salzano G, Wingate D, Hughes IA, MacDougall J, et al: Pregnancy insulin, glucose, and BMI contribute to birth outcomes in nondiabetic mothers. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 2193-2197. 10.2337/dc08-1111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group: Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with neonatal anthropometrics. Diabetes. 2009, 58: 453-459.CrossRef

50.

Taslimi MM, Navabi K, Acosta R, Helmer A, El-Sayed YY: Concealed maternal blood glucose excursions correlate with birth weight centile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008, 2: 456-460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Lee BM, Wolever TM: Effect of glucose, sucrose and fructose on plasma glucose and insulin responses in normal humans: comparison with white bread. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998, 52: 924-928. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600666.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Stanhope KL, Bremer AA, Medici V, Nakajima K, Ito Y, Nakano T, et al: Consumption of Fructose and High Fructose Corn Syrup Increase Postprandial Triglycerides, LDL-Cholesterol, and Apolipoprotein-B in Young Men and Women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 96: E1596-E1605. 10.1210/jc.2011-1251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Stanley K, Fraser R, Bruce C: Physiological changes in insulin resistance in human pregnancy: longitudinal study with the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998, 105: 756-759. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10207.x.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Pedersen J: Diabetes and Pregnancy. 1952, Blood sugar of newborn infants. PhD Thesis. Copenhagen, Danish Science Press, Copenhagen

55.

Langer O: Fetal macrosomia: etiologic factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 43: 283-297. 10.1097/00003081-200006000-00006.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Rendell MS, Jovanovic L: Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia. Metabolism. 2006, 55: 1263-1281. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.05.012.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Nseir W, Nassar F, Assy N: Soft drinks consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16: 2579-2588. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i21.2579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Nolan CJ, Riley SF, Sheedy MT, Walstab JE, Beischer NA: Maternal serum triglyceride, glucose tolerance, and neonatal birth weight ratio in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 1995, 18: 1550-1556. 10.2337/diacare.18.12.1550.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Gustavsen GW, [Trends in consumption of carbonated beverages] 12: Oslo, Norway. 2003, Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Ref Type, Report

60.

[The development in Norwegian diet 2007. Food availibility statistics and consumer surveys]. IS-1510: Oslo, Norway. 2008, The Norwegian Directorate for Health. Ref Type, Report

61.

Azadbakht L, Surkan PJ, Esmaillzadeh A, Willett WC: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension eating plan affects C-reactive protein, coagulation abnormalities, and hepatic function tests among type 2 diabetic patients. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 1083-1088. 10.3945/jn.110.136739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/901/prepub

Title: Possible relation between maternal consumption of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and birth weight – time trends in a population
Authors: Jacob Holter Grundt
Jakob Nakling
Geir Egil Eide
Trond Markestad
Publication date: 01-12-2012
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-901

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Possible relation between maternal consumption of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and birth weight – time trends in a population

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

A school-based comprehensive lifestyle intervention among chinese kids against obesity (CLICK-Obesity): rationale, design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial in Nanjing city, China

Women show a closer association between educational level and hypertension or diabetes mellitus than males: a secondary analysis from the Austrian HIS

A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention

Prevalence of bullying and victimization among children in early elementary school: Do family and school neighbourhood socioeconomic status matter?

"Now we are in a different time; various bad diseases have come." understanding men's acceptability of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a moderate prevalence setting

Association between sedentary behaviour and socioeconomic factors, diet and lifestyle among the Balearic Islands adolescents