Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: Design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project

Authors: Julie Barnett, Aine McConnon, Jean Kennedy, Monique Raats, Richard Shepherd, Wim Verbeke, Jon Fletcher, Margôt Kuttschreuter, Luisa Lima, Josephine Wills, Patrick Wall

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

European consumers are faced with a myriad of food related risk and benefit information and it is regularly left up to the consumer to interpret these, often conflicting, pieces of information as a coherent message. This conflict is especially apparent in times of food crises and can have major public health implications. Scientific results and risk assessments cannot always be easily communicated into simple guidelines and advice that non-scientists like the public or the media can easily understand especially when there is conflicting, uncertain or complex information about a particular food or aspects thereof. The need for improved strategies and tools for communication about food risks and benefits is therefore paramount. The FoodRisC project ("Food Risk Communication - Perceptions and communication of food risks/benefits across Europe: development of effective communication strategies") aims to address this issue. The FoodRisC project will examine consumer perceptions and investigate how people acquire and use information in food domains in order to develop targeted strategies for food communication across Europe.

Methods/Design

This project consists of 6 research work packages which, using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, are focused on development of a framework for investigating food risk/benefit issues across Europe, exploration of the role of new and traditional media in food communication and testing of the framework in order to develop evidence based communication strategies and tools. The main outcome of the FoodRisC project will be a toolkit to enable coherent communication of food risk/benefit messages in Europe. The toolkit will integrate theoretical models and new measurement paradigms as well as building on social marketing approaches around consumer segmentation. Use of the toolkit and guides will assist policy makers, food authorities and other end users in developing common approaches to communicating coherent messages to consumers in Europe.

Discussion

The FoodRisC project offers a unique approach to the investigation of food risk/benefit communication. The effective spread of food risk/benefit information will assist initiatives aimed at reducing the burden of food-related illness and disease, reducing the economic impact of food crises and ensuring that confidence in safe and nutritious food is fostered and maintained in Europe.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller D, Reilly J: Making an issue of food safety: the media, pressure groups, and the public sphere. Eating agendas: food and nutrition as social problems. 1995, 305-336. Miller D, Reilly J: Making an issue of food safety: the media, pressure groups, and the public sphere. Eating agendas: food and nutrition as social problems. 1995, 305-336.
2.
go back to reference Phillips L, Bridgeman J, Ferguson-Smith M: The BSE Inquiry: the report. UK Government. 2000 Phillips L, Bridgeman J, Ferguson-Smith M: The BSE Inquiry: the report. UK Government. 2000
3.
go back to reference Vos E: EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2000, 23 (3): 227-255. 10.1023/A:1007123502914.CrossRef Vos E: EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2000, 23 (3): 227-255. 10.1023/A:1007123502914.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Commission of the European Communities: White Paper on Food Safety. 2000 Commission of the European Communities: White Paper on Food Safety. 2000
5.
go back to reference Foster R, Lunn J: 40th Anniversary Briefing Paper: Food availability and our changing diet. Nutrition Bulletin. 2007, 32 (3): 187-249. 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00648.x.CrossRef Foster R, Lunn J: 40th Anniversary Briefing Paper: Food availability and our changing diet. Nutrition Bulletin. 2007, 32 (3): 187-249. 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00648.x.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kasperson J, Kasperson R, Pidgeon N, Slovic P: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. The social amplification of risk. Edited by: Pidgeon N, Kasperson R, Slovic P. 2003, Cambridge Univ Pr Kasperson J, Kasperson R, Pidgeon N, Slovic P: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. The social amplification of risk. Edited by: Pidgeon N, Kasperson R, Slovic P. 2003, Cambridge Univ Pr
7.
go back to reference Renn O, Corporation E: Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. 2008, Earthscan London Renn O, Corporation E: Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. 2008, Earthscan London
8.
go back to reference Vilella-Vila M, Costa-Font J: Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. Journal of Socio-Economics. 2008, 37 (5): 2095-2106. 10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.006.CrossRef Vilella-Vila M, Costa-Font J: Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. Journal of Socio-Economics. 2008, 37 (5): 2095-2106. 10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.006.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Powell D, Leiss W: Mad cows and mother's milk: the perils of poor risk communication. 1997, McGill Queens Univ Pr Powell D, Leiss W: Mad cows and mother's milk: the perils of poor risk communication. 1997, McGill Queens Univ Pr
10.
go back to reference Directorate-General for Health & Consumers: Future Challenges for EU Health and Consumer Policies. European Commission. 2008 Directorate-General for Health & Consumers: Future Challenges for EU Health and Consumer Policies. European Commission. 2008
11.
go back to reference Knowles T, Moody R, McEachern M: European food scares and their impact on EU food policy. British Food Journal. 2007, 109 (1): 43-67. 10.1108/00070700710718507.CrossRef Knowles T, Moody R, McEachern M: European food scares and their impact on EU food policy. British Food Journal. 2007, 109 (1): 43-67. 10.1108/00070700710718507.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cope S, Frewer LJ, Houghton J, Rowe G, Fischer ARH, de Jonge J: Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy. Food Policy. 2010, 35 (4): 349-357. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.002.CrossRef Cope S, Frewer LJ, Houghton J, Rowe G, Fischer ARH, de Jonge J: Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy. Food Policy. 2010, 35 (4): 349-357. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.002.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shannon C, Weaver W: The mathematical theory of communication. 1949, Urbana, IL. University of Illinois Press Shannon C, Weaver W: The mathematical theory of communication. 1949, Urbana, IL. University of Illinois Press
14.
go back to reference Renn O: Basic Concepts and Challenges of Risk Communication. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. 2008, London: Earthscan Renn O: Basic Concepts and Challenges of Risk Communication. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. 2008, London: Earthscan
15.
go back to reference Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Frewer L, Sioen I, De Henauw S, Van Camp J: Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: Impact on Belgian consumers' perception and intention to eat fish. Risk Analysis. 2008, 28 (4): 951-967.PubMed Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Frewer L, Sioen I, De Henauw S, Van Camp J: Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: Impact on Belgian consumers' perception and intention to eat fish. Risk Analysis. 2008, 28 (4): 951-967.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Lofstedt R: How can we Make Food Risk Communication Better: Where are we and Where are we Going?. Journal of Risk research. 2006, 9 (8): 869-890. 10.1080/13669870601065585.CrossRef Lofstedt R: How can we Make Food Risk Communication Better: Where are we and Where are we Going?. Journal of Risk research. 2006, 9 (8): 869-890. 10.1080/13669870601065585.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sioen I, Van Camp J, Verdonck F, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Willems J, De Henauw S: Probabilistic intake assessment of multiple compounds as a tool to quantify the nutritional-toxicological conflict related to seafood consumption. Chemosphere. 2008, 71 (6): 1056-1066. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.025.CrossRefPubMed Sioen I, Van Camp J, Verdonck F, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Willems J, De Henauw S: Probabilistic intake assessment of multiple compounds as a tool to quantify the nutritional-toxicological conflict related to seafood consumption. Chemosphere. 2008, 71 (6): 1056-1066. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.025.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sioen I, Bilau M, Verdonck F, Verbeke W, Willems J, De Henauw S, Van Camp J: Probabilistic intake assessment of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and omega 3 fatty acids through fish consumption. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2008, 52 (2): 250-257. 10.1002/mnfr.200700109.CrossRef Sioen I, Bilau M, Verdonck F, Verbeke W, Willems J, De Henauw S, Van Camp J: Probabilistic intake assessment of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and omega 3 fatty acids through fish consumption. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2008, 52 (2): 250-257. 10.1002/mnfr.200700109.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hoekstra J, Hart A, Boobis A, Claupein E, Cockburn A, Hunt A, Knudsen I, Richardson D, Schilter B, Schütte K: BRAFO tiered approach for benefit-risk assessment of foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology. Hoekstra J, Hart A, Boobis A, Claupein E, Cockburn A, Hunt A, Knudsen I, Richardson D, Schilter B, Schütte K: BRAFO tiered approach for benefit-risk assessment of foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology.
20.
go back to reference Bowman SWC: We Media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. Edited by: Lasica JD. 2003, The Media Center at the American Press Institute Bowman SWC: We Media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. Edited by: Lasica JD. 2003, The Media Center at the American Press Institute
21.
go back to reference Hohl K, Gaskell G: European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis. 2008, 28 (2): 311-324. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01021.x.CrossRefPubMed Hohl K, Gaskell G: European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis. 2008, 28 (2): 311-324. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01021.x.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kjærnes U: Trust and distrust: cognitive decisions or social relations?. Journal of Risk research. 2006, 9 (8): 911-932. 10.1080/13669870601065577.CrossRef Kjærnes U: Trust and distrust: cognitive decisions or social relations?. Journal of Risk research. 2006, 9 (8): 911-932. 10.1080/13669870601065577.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Dosman D, Adamowicz W, Hrudey S: Socioeconomic Determinants of Health and Food Safety Related Risk Perceptions. Risk Analysis. 2001, 21 (2): 307-318. 10.1111/0272-4332.212113.CrossRefPubMed Dosman D, Adamowicz W, Hrudey S: Socioeconomic Determinants of Health and Food Safety Related Risk Perceptions. Risk Analysis. 2001, 21 (2): 307-318. 10.1111/0272-4332.212113.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wardle J, Haase A, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisie F: Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004, 27 (2): 107-116. 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.CrossRefPubMed Wardle J, Haase A, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisie F: Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004, 27 (2): 107-116. 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Colley A, Gale M, Harris T: Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 1994, 10 (2): 129-137. 10.2190/8NA7-DAEY-GM8P-EUN5.CrossRef Colley A, Gale M, Harris T: Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 1994, 10 (2): 129-137. 10.2190/8NA7-DAEY-GM8P-EUN5.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fischer A, De Vries P: Everyday behaviour and everyday risk: An approach to study people's responses to frequently encountered food related health risks. Health, Risk & Society. 2008, 10 (4): 385-397. 10.1080/13698570802166449.CrossRef Fischer A, De Vries P: Everyday behaviour and everyday risk: An approach to study people's responses to frequently encountered food related health risks. Health, Risk & Society. 2008, 10 (4): 385-397. 10.1080/13698570802166449.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Marler B: Marler's Ten Top Food Safety Challenges for 2009. 2009: Marler B: Marler's Ten Top Food Safety Challenges for 2009. 2009:
29.
go back to reference Barnett J: On Line Deliberative Engagement: A Pilot Study. Research Report. 2008, London: The Wellcome Trust Barnett J: On Line Deliberative Engagement: A Pilot Study. Research Report. 2008, London: The Wellcome Trust
Metadata
Title
Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: Design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project
Authors
Julie Barnett
Aine McConnon
Jean Kennedy
Monique Raats
Richard Shepherd
Wim Verbeke
Jon Fletcher
Margôt Kuttschreuter
Luisa Lima
Josephine Wills
Patrick Wall
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-308

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Public Health 1/2011 Go to the issue