Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Developing a tool for obtaining maternal skinfold thickness measurements and assessing inter-observer variability among pregnant women who are overweight and obese

Authors: Lavern M Kannieappan, Andrea R Deussen, Rosalie M Grivell, Lisa Yelland, Jodie M Dodd

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is estimated that between 34% and 50% of Australian women entering pregnancy are overweight and obese, which is associated with an increased risk in complications for both the woman and her infant. Current tools used in clinical and research practice for measuring body composition include body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and bioimpedance analysis. Not all of these measures are applicable for use during pregnancy due to a lack of differentiation between maternal and fetal contributions. While skinfold thickness measurement (SFTM) is increasingly being used in pregnancy, there is limited data and a lack of a standard tool for its use in overweight and obese pregnant women.

Methods

We developed a standard tool for evaluating SFTM among women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. Forty-nine women were measured as part of a prospective cohort study nested within a multicentre randomised controlled trial (The LIMIT Randomised Controlled Trial). Two blinded observers each performed 2 skinfold measurements on the biceps, triceps and subscapular of each woman. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used to analyse SFTM, body fat percentage (BF%) and inter-observer variability.

Results

The ICC for inter-observer variability in measurements were considered moderate for biceps SFTM (ICC = 0.56) and triceps SFTM (ICC = 0.51); good for subscapular SFTM (ICC = 0.71) and BF% (ICC = 0.74); and excellent for arm circumference (ICC = 0.97). The standard error of measurements ranged from 0.53 cm for arm circumference to 3.58 mm for the subscapular SFTM.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that arm circumference and biceps, triceps and subscapular SFTM can be reliably obtained from overweight and obese pregnant women to calculate BF%, using multiple observers, and can be used in a research setting.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000161426
Literature
1.
go back to reference Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, McIntyre HD: The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust. 2006, 184 (2): 56-59.PubMed Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, McIntyre HD: The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust. 2006, 184 (2): 56-59.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Nguyen AM, Chan A, Robinson JS: Maternal and perinatal health outcomes by body mass index category. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011, 51 (2): 136-140. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01272.x.CrossRefPubMed Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Nguyen AM, Chan A, Robinson JS: Maternal and perinatal health outcomes by body mass index category. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011, 51 (2): 136-140. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01272.x.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chan ASJ, Nguyenn AM, Sage L: Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2007. 2008, Adelaide: Government of South Australia Chan ASJ, Nguyenn AM, Sage L: Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2007. 2008, Adelaide: Government of South Australia
4.
go back to reference Athukorala C, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA: The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 56-10.1186/1471-2393-10-56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Athukorala C, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA: The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 56-10.1186/1471-2393-10-56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference WHO: Part 1 the problem of overweight and obesity. 1995, Geneva: World Health Organisation WHO: Part 1 the problem of overweight and obesity. 1995, Geneva: World Health Organisation
6.
go back to reference Fattah C, Farah N, Barry S, O’Connor N, Stuart B, Turner MJ: The measurement of maternal adiposity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009, 29 (8): 686-689. 10.3109/01443610903184025.CrossRefPubMed Fattah C, Farah N, Barry S, O’Connor N, Stuart B, Turner MJ: The measurement of maternal adiposity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009, 29 (8): 686-689. 10.3109/01443610903184025.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A, Carter JEL: International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. 2006, Potchefstroom, RSA: North-West University Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A, Carter JEL: International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. 2006, Potchefstroom, RSA: North-West University
8.
go back to reference Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Altomare F, Sorge R, Casalino B, De Lorenzo A, Arduini D: Body composition during normal pregnancy: reference ranges. Acta Diabetol. 2003, 40 (Suppl 1): S225-S232.CrossRefPubMed Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Altomare F, Sorge R, Casalino B, De Lorenzo A, Arduini D: Body composition during normal pregnancy: reference ranges. Acta Diabetol. 2003, 40 (Suppl 1): S225-S232.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fattah C, Farah N, Barry SC, O’Connor N, Stuart B, Turner MJ: Maternal weight and body composition in the first trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89 (7): 952-955. 10.3109/00016341003801706.CrossRefPubMed Fattah C, Farah N, Barry SC, O’Connor N, Stuart B, Turner MJ: Maternal weight and body composition in the first trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89 (7): 952-955. 10.3109/00016341003801706.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dodd JM, Turnbull DA, McPhee AJ, Wittert G, Crowther CA, Robinson JS: Limiting weight gain in overweight and obese women during pregnancy to improve health outcomes: the LIMIT randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011, 11: 79-10.1186/1471-2393-11-79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dodd JM, Turnbull DA, McPhee AJ, Wittert G, Crowther CA, Robinson JS: Limiting weight gain in overweight and obese women during pregnancy to improve health outcomes: the LIMIT randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011, 11: 79-10.1186/1471-2393-11-79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Portney LG WM: Foundations of clinical practice: applications to practice. 2000, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, Third edn Portney LG WM: Foundations of clinical practice: applications to practice. 2000, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, Third edn
12.
go back to reference Nordhamn K, Sodergren E, Olsson E, Karlstrom B, Vessby B, Berglund L: Reliability of anthropometric measurements in overweight and lean subjects: consequences for correlations between anthropometric and other variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000, 24 (5): 652-657. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801216.CrossRefPubMed Nordhamn K, Sodergren E, Olsson E, Karlstrom B, Vessby B, Berglund L: Reliability of anthropometric measurements in overweight and lean subjects: consequences for correlations between anthropometric and other variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000, 24 (5): 652-657. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801216.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Klipstein-Grobusch K, Georg T, Boeing H: Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (Suppl 1): S174-S180.CrossRefPubMed Klipstein-Grobusch K, Georg T, Boeing H: Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (Suppl 1): S174-S180.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Huston Presley L, Wong WW, Roman NM, Amini SB, Catalano PM: Anthropometric estimation of maternal body composition in late gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 96 (1): 33-37. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00857-7.CrossRefPubMed Huston Presley L, Wong WW, Roman NM, Amini SB, Catalano PM: Anthropometric estimation of maternal body composition in late gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 96 (1): 33-37. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00857-7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lopez LB CE, Poy MS, Balmaceda YD, Camera K: Changes in skinfolds and mid-upper arm circumference during pregnancy in Argentine women. Maternal Child Nutr. 2011, 7 (3): 253-262. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00237.x.CrossRef Lopez LB CE, Poy MS, Balmaceda YD, Camera K: Changes in skinfolds and mid-upper arm circumference during pregnancy in Argentine women. Maternal Child Nutr. 2011, 7 (3): 253-262. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00237.x.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Soltani H, Fraser RB: A longitudinal study of maternal anthropometric changes in normal weight, overweight and obese women during pregnancy and postpartum. Br J Nutr. 2000, 84 (1): 95-101. 10.1017/S0007114500001276.CrossRefPubMed Soltani H, Fraser RB: A longitudinal study of maternal anthropometric changes in normal weight, overweight and obese women during pregnancy and postpartum. Br J Nutr. 2000, 84 (1): 95-101. 10.1017/S0007114500001276.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taggart NR, Holliday RM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE, Thomson AM: Changes in skinfolds during pregnancy. Br J Nutr. 1967, 21 (2): 439-451. 10.1079/BJN19670045.CrossRefPubMed Taggart NR, Holliday RM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE, Thomson AM: Changes in skinfolds during pregnancy. Br J Nutr. 1967, 21 (2): 439-451. 10.1079/BJN19670045.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Developing a tool for obtaining maternal skinfold thickness measurements and assessing inter-observer variability among pregnant women who are overweight and obese
Authors
Lavern M Kannieappan
Andrea R Deussen
Rosalie M Grivell
Lisa Yelland
Jodie M Dodd
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-42

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013 Go to the issue