Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Bayesian versus frequentist statistical inference for investigating a one-off cancer cluster reported to a health department

Authors: Michael D Coory, Rachael A Wills, Adrian G Barnett

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The problem of silent multiple comparisons is one of the most difficult statistical problems faced by scientists. It is a particular problem for investigating a one-off cancer cluster reported to a health department because any one of hundreds, or possibly thousands, of neighbourhoods, schools, or workplaces could have reported a cluster, which could have been for any one of several types of cancer or any one of several time periods.

Methods

This paper contrasts the frequentist approach with a Bayesian approach for dealing with silent multiple comparisons in the context of a one-off cluster reported to a health department. Two published cluster investigations were re-analysed using the Dunn-Sidak method to adjust frequentist p-values and confidence intervals for silent multiple comparisons. Bayesian methods were based on the Gamma distribution.

Results

Bayesian analysis with non-informative priors produced results similar to the frequentist analysis, and suggested that both clusters represented a statistical excess. In the frequentist framework, the statistical significance of both clusters was extremely sensitive to the number of silent multiple comparisons, which can only ever be a subjective "guesstimate". The Bayesian approach is also subjective: whether there is an apparent statistical excess depends on the specified prior.

Conclusion

In cluster investigations, the frequentist approach is just as subjective as the Bayesian approach, but the Bayesian approach is less ambitious in that it treats the analysis as a synthesis of data and personal judgements (possibly poor ones), rather than objective reality. Bayesian analysis is (arguably) a useful tool to support complicated decision-making, because it makes the uncertainty associated with silent multiple comparisons explicit.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Caldwell GG: Twenty-two years of cancer cluster investigations at the Centers for Disease Control. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132: S43-7.PubMed Caldwell GG: Twenty-two years of cancer cluster investigations at the Centers for Disease Control. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132: S43-7.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Thun MJ, Sinks T: Understanding cancer clusters. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004, 54: 273-80. 10.3322/canjclin.54.5.273.CrossRefPubMed Thun MJ, Sinks T: Understanding cancer clusters. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004, 54: 273-80. 10.3322/canjclin.54.5.273.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kingsley BS, Schmeichel KL, Rubin CH: An update on cancer cluster activities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115: 165-71.CrossRefPubMed Kingsley BS, Schmeichel KL, Rubin CH: An update on cancer cluster activities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115: 165-71.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rothman K: A sobering start to the cluster busters' conference. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132 (1 Suppl): S6-S13.PubMed Rothman K: A sobering start to the cluster busters' conference. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132 (1 Suppl): S6-S13.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Neutra RR: Counterpoint from a cluster buster. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132: 1-8.PubMed Neutra RR: Counterpoint from a cluster buster. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132: 1-8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Berry D: The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities. Pharmaceut Statist. 2007, 6: 155-60. 10.1002/pst.303.CrossRef Berry D: The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities. Pharmaceut Statist. 2007, 6: 155-60. 10.1002/pst.303.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Easterbrook P, Berlin J, Gopalan R, Matthews D: Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991, 337: 867-72. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y.CrossRefPubMed Easterbrook P, Berlin J, Gopalan R, Matthews D: Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991, 337: 867-72. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chan A, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr M, Gotzsche P, Altman D: Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials. JAMA. 2004, 291: 2457-65. 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457.CrossRefPubMed Chan A, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr M, Gotzsche P, Altman D: Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials. JAMA. 2004, 291: 2457-65. 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wartenberg D: Why, when and how?. J R Statist Soc A. 2001, 164: 13-22. 10.1111/1467-985X.00181.CrossRef Wartenberg D: Why, when and how?. J R Statist Soc A. 2001, 164: 13-22. 10.1111/1467-985X.00181.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Frumkin H, Kantrowitz W: Cancer clusters in the workplace: An approach to investigation. J Occup Med. 1987, 29: 949-52.PubMed Frumkin H, Kantrowitz W: Cancer clusters in the workplace: An approach to investigation. J Occup Med. 1987, 29: 949-52.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Leech JA: Cancer cluster investigation: toward a more rational approach. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1989, 141 (2): 105-6.PubMedPubMedCentral Leech JA: Cancer cluster investigation: toward a more rational approach. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1989, 141 (2): 105-6.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: Cancer Clusters, Hearing before the Senate Cancer Coalition. MMWR. 1990, 391: 1-23. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: Cancer Clusters, Hearing before the Senate Cancer Coalition. MMWR. 1990, 391: 1-23.
14.
go back to reference Fiore BJ, Hanrahan LP, Anderson HA: State health department response to disease cluster reports: a protocol for investigation. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132 (1 Suppl): S14-22.PubMed Fiore BJ, Hanrahan LP, Anderson HA: State health department response to disease cluster reports: a protocol for investigation. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132 (1 Suppl): S14-22.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Westley-Wise V, Stewart B, Kries I, et al: Investigation of a cluster of leukaemia in the Illawarra region of New South Wales, 1989–1996. Med J Aust. 1999, 171: 178-83.PubMed Westley-Wise V, Stewart B, Kries I, et al: Investigation of a cluster of leukaemia in the Illawarra region of New South Wales, 1989–1996. Med J Aust. 1999, 171: 178-83.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ulm K: A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardised mortality ratio (SMR). Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 131: 373-5.PubMed Ulm K: A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardised mortality ratio (SMR). Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 131: 373-5.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Leon A, Heo M: A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints. J Biopharmaceut Statist. 2005, 15: 839-55. 10.1081/BIP-200067922.CrossRef Leon A, Heo M: A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints. J Biopharmaceut Statist. 2005, 15: 839-55. 10.1081/BIP-200067922.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Congdon P: Bayesian Statistical Modelling. 2001, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Congdon P: Bayesian Statistical Modelling. 2001, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
21.
go back to reference Greenland S: Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35 (3): 765-75. 10.1093/ije/dyi312.CrossRefPubMed Greenland S: Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35 (3): 765-75. 10.1093/ije/dyi312.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Berry D, Hochberg Y: Bayesian perspectives on multiple comparisons. J Stat Planning and Inference. 1999, 82: 215-27. 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00044-0.CrossRef Berry D, Hochberg Y: Bayesian perspectives on multiple comparisons. J Stat Planning and Inference. 1999, 82: 215-27. 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00044-0.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Westfall P, Johnson W, Utts J: A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika. 1997, 84: 419-27. 10.1093/biomet/84.2.419.CrossRef Westfall P, Johnson W, Utts J: A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika. 1997, 84: 419-27. 10.1093/biomet/84.2.419.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Greenland SRJ: Empirical-Bayes adjustments for multiple comparisons are sometimes useful. Epidemiology. 1991, 2: 244-51.CrossRefPubMed Greenland SRJ: Empirical-Bayes adjustments for multiple comparisons are sometimes useful. Epidemiology. 1991, 2: 244-51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lunn D, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D: WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing. 2000, 10: 325-37. 10.1023/A:1008929526011.CrossRef Lunn D, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D: WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing. 2000, 10: 325-37. 10.1023/A:1008929526011.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gangnon RE, Clayton MK: Bayesian Detection and Modeling of Spatial Disease Clustering. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 922-935. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00922.x.CrossRefPubMed Gangnon RE, Clayton MK: Bayesian Detection and Modeling of Spatial Disease Clustering. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 922-935. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00922.x.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lawson AB: Statistical Methods in Spatial Epidemiology. 2006, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2CrossRef Lawson AB: Statistical Methods in Spatial Epidemiology. 2006, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pfeiffer DU, Robinson TP, Stevenson M, Stevens KB, Rogers DJ, Clements ACA: Spatial Analysis in Epidemiology. 2008, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Pfeiffer DU, Robinson TP, Stevenson M, Stevens KB, Rogers DJ, Clements ACA: Spatial Analysis in Epidemiology. 2008, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chalmers AF: What is this thing called science?: an assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods. 1999, St Lucia, Qld.: University of Queensland Press, 3 Chalmers AF: What is this thing called science?: an assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods. 1999, St Lucia, Qld.: University of Queensland Press, 3
Metadata
Title
Bayesian versus frequentist statistical inference for investigating a one-off cancer cluster reported to a health department
Authors
Michael D Coory
Rachael A Wills
Adrian G Barnett
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-30

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009 Go to the issue