Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology Experimental 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Narrative review

Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Renato Cuocolo, Maria Brunella Cipullo, Arnaldo Stanzione, Lorenzo Ugga, Valeria Romeo, Leonardo Radice, Arturo Brunetti, Massimo Imbriaco

Published in: European Radiology Experimental | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

With this review, we aimed to provide a synopsis of recently proposed applications of machine learning (ML) in radiology focusing on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After defining the difference between ML and classical rule-based algorithms and the distinction among supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning, we explain the characteristic of deep learning (DL), a particular new type of ML, including its structure mimicking human neural networks and its ‘black box’ nature. Differences in the pipeline for applying ML and DL to prostate MRI are highlighted. The following potential clinical applications in different settings are outlined, many of them based only on MRI-unenhanced sequences: gland segmentation; assessment of lesion aggressiveness to distinguish between clinically significant and indolent cancers, allowing for active surveillance; cancer detection/diagnosis and localisation (transition versus peripheral zone, use of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2), reading reproducibility, differentiation of cancers from prostatitis benign hyperplasia; local staging and pre-treatment assessment (detection of extraprostatic disease extension, planning of radiation therapy); and prediction of biochemical recurrence. Results are promising, but clinical applicability still requires more robust validation across scanner vendors, field strengths and institutions.
Literature
4.
go back to reference van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023 CrossRef van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2018.​11.​023 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boesen L, Nørgaard N, Løgager V, Balslev I, Thomsen HS (2017) A prospective comparison of selective multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted and systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for detecting prostate cancer in men undergoing repeated biopsies. Urol Int 99:384–391 https://doi.org/10.1159/000477214 CrossRef Boesen L, Nørgaard N, Løgager V, Balslev I, Thomsen HS (2017) A prospective comparison of selective multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted and systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for detecting prostate cancer in men undergoing repeated biopsies. Urol Int 99:384–391 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000477214 CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Glazer DI, Mayo-Smith WW, Sainani NI et al (2017) Interreader agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 using an in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy cohort: a single institution’s initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:W145–W151 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17551 CrossRef Glazer DI, Mayo-Smith WW, Sainani NI et al (2017) Interreader agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 using an in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy cohort: a single institution’s initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:W145–W151 https://​doi.​org/​10.​2214/​AJR.​16.​17551 CrossRef
29.
40.
41.
go back to reference Wu M, Krishna S, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, McInnes MDF, Schieda N (2019) Transition zone prostate cancer: Logistic regression and machine-learning models of quantitative ADC, shape and texture features are highly accurate for diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging, [Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26674 Wu M, Krishna S, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, McInnes MDF, Schieda N (2019) Transition zone prostate cancer: Logistic regression and machine-learning models of quantitative ADC, shape and texture features are highly accurate for diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging, [Epub ahead of print. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​26674
60.
Metadata
Title
Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Renato Cuocolo
Maria Brunella Cipullo
Arnaldo Stanzione
Lorenzo Ugga
Valeria Romeo
Leonardo Radice
Arturo Brunetti
Massimo Imbriaco
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
European Radiology Experimental / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2509-9280
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0109-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Radiology Experimental 1/2019 Go to the issue