Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review

Authors: Krister Järbrink, Gao Ni, Henrik Sönnergren, Artur Schmidtchen, Caroline Pang, Ram Bajpai, Josip Car

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chronic wounds impose a significant and often underappreciated burden to the individual, the healthcare system and the society as a whole. Preliminary literature search suggests that there are at present no reliable estimates on the total prevalence of chronic wounds for different settings and categories of chronic wounds. Such information is essential for policy and planning purposes as the increasing number of elderly and the prevalence of lifestyle diseases point in the direction of an increased burden. Knowledge about the prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds in relation to population characteristics is important for informing healthcare planning and resource allocation. The objective is to present a transparent process for how to review the existing literature on the prevalence and incidence rates of chronic wounds and resulting implications.

Methods/design

We will search electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the EBM Reviews and Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Global Health) and reference lists of included articles. Two investigators will independently screen titles and abstracts and select studies involving adults with chronic wounds. These investigators will also independently extract data using a pre-designed data extraction form that will cover information on demographics, diagnostics including disease prevalence, medical history, hospital and community-based management and outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed to address the heterogeneity across studies. Meta-analysis will also be performed if homogeneous group of studies will be found. The collective evidence will be further stratified according to the important background variables if allowed.

Discussion

This study will describe the available epidemiological evidence and summarise prevalence and incidence rates of chronic wounds and related complications. A better understanding of the relationship between population profile and the prevalence of chronic wounds and related complications will be helpful in the development of guidelines for patient management.

Systematic review registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Percoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, Robson MC. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1994;2:165–70.CrossRefPubMed Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Percoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, Robson MC. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1994;2:165–70.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Werdin F, Tennenhaus M, Schaller HE, Rennekampff HO. Evidence-based management strategies for treatment of chronic wounds. Eplasty. 2009;9, e19.PubMedPubMedCentral Werdin F, Tennenhaus M, Schaller HE, Rennekampff HO. Evidence-based management strategies for treatment of chronic wounds. Eplasty. 2009;9, e19.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gottrup F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: importance of a multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5):S38–43.CrossRef Gottrup F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: importance of a multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5):S38–43.CrossRef
8.
10.
go back to reference Margolis D. Epidemiology of wounds. In: Romanelli M, Shukla V, Mani R, editors. Measurements in Wound Healing. London: Springer; 2013. p. 145–53. Margolis D. Epidemiology of wounds. In: Romanelli M, Shukla V, Mani R, editors. Measurements in Wound Healing. London: Springer; 2013. p. 145–53.
11.
go back to reference MacDonald J. Global initiative for wound and lymphoedema care (GIWLC). Journal of Lymphoedema. 2009;4(2):92–5. MacDonald J. Global initiative for wound and lymphoedema care (GIWLC). Journal of Lymphoedema. 2009;4(2):92–5.
12.
go back to reference Heyer K, Augustin M, Protz K, Herberger K, Spehr C, Rustenbach S. Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatology. 2013. doi:10.1159/000348331. Epub 2013 May 22. Heyer K, Augustin M, Protz K, Herberger K, Spehr C, Rustenbach S. Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatology. 2013. doi:10.​1159/​000348331. Epub 2013 May 22.
13.
go back to reference Denny K, Lawand C, Perry S. Compromised wounds in Canada. Healthcare Quarterly (Toronto, Ont). 2013;17(1):7–10.CrossRef Denny K, Lawand C, Perry S. Compromised wounds in Canada. Healthcare Quarterly (Toronto, Ont). 2013;17(1):7–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Posnett J, Franks PJ. The burden of chronic wounds in the UK. Nurs Times. 2008;104(3):44–5.PubMed Posnett J, Franks PJ. The burden of chronic wounds in the UK. Nurs Times. 2008;104(3):44–5.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Graves N, Zheng H. The prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds: a literature review. Wound Practice and Research. 2014;22(1):4–19. Graves N, Zheng H. The prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds: a literature review. Wound Practice and Research. 2014;22(1):4–19.
16.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015. doi:10.​1186/​2046-4053-4-1.
18.
go back to reference Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams Jr JW, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schunemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–82.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams Jr JW, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schunemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–82.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–13.CrossRef Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–13.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Chan KY, Wang W, Wu JJ, Liu L, Theodoratou E, Car J, Middleton L, Russ TC, Deary IJ, Campbell H, Rudan I. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in China, 1990–2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60221-4.PubMedCentral Chan KY, Wang W, Wu JJ, Liu L, Theodoratou E, Car J, Middleton L, Russ TC, Deary IJ, Campbell H, Rudan I. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in China, 1990–2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(13)60221-4.PubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Scott BN, Roberts DJ, Robertson HL, Kramer AH, Laupland KB, Ousman SS, Kubes P, Zygun DA. Incidence, prevalence, and occurrence rate of infection among adults hospitalized after traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-68. Scott BN, Roberts DJ, Robertson HL, Kramer AH, Laupland KB, Ousman SS, Kubes P, Zygun DA. Incidence, prevalence, and occurrence rate of infection among adults hospitalized after traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013. doi:10.​1186/​2046-4053-2-68.
Metadata
Title
Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review
Authors
Krister Järbrink
Gao Ni
Henrik Sönnergren
Artur Schmidtchen
Caroline Pang
Ram Bajpai
Josip Car
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Systematic Reviews 1/2016 Go to the issue