Published in:
Open Access
01-12-2015 | Editorial
Qualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews
Author:
David Gough
Published in:
Systematic Reviews
|
Issue 1/2015
Login to get access
Excerpt
The logic of systematic reviews is very simple. We use transparent rigorous approaches to undertake primary research, and so we should do the same in bringing together studies to describe what has been studied (a research map) or to integrate the findings of the different studies to answer a research question (a research synthesis). We should not really need to use the term ‘systematic’ as it should be assumed that researchers are using and reporting systematic methods in all of their research, whether primary or secondary. Despite the universality of this logic, systematic reviews (maps and syntheses) are much better known in health research and for answering questions of the effectiveness of interventions (what works). Systematic reviews addressing other sorts of questions have been around for many years, as in, for example, meta ethnography [
1] and other forms of conceptual synthesis [
2], but only recently has there been a major increase in the use of systematic review approaches to answer other sorts of research questions. …