Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Venous Leg Ulcer | Study protocol

Compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers: study protocol for a process evaluation in a randomised controlled trial, VenUS 6

Authors: Maartje Kletter, Jane Griffiths, Catherine Arundel, Jo Dumville, on behalf of the VenUS 6 Collaborators

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The VenUS 6 parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) will compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression wraps, two-layer compression bandage and evidence-based compression therapy, comprising of two-layers of hosiery or four-layer bandages, for healing time of venous leg ulcers. We will conduct an embedded process evaluation to evaluate the implementation of the trial and the various compression therapies and to gain a more in-depth understanding of trial participant and nursing staff views and experiences of these therapies.

Methods

This process evaluation will be a mixed-method study, embedded into a wider RCT. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured individual in-depth interviews with trial participants and staff members. Quantitative data will be collected using patient questionnaires and case report forms that are part of the main trial data collection process. Interview transcripts will be analysed using the Framework Analysis and interview data will be integrated with quantitative RCT data using the RE-AIM framework and the Pillar Integration Process.

Discussion

We describe the protocol for a process evaluation, designed to assess the implementation of the various venous leg ulcer compression therapies as evaluated in VenUS6, and the experiences of trial participants and nursing staff using these. This protocol provides one example of how an embedded mixed-method process evaluation can be conducted.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 67321719 (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​ISRCTN67321719). Prospectively registered on 14 September 2020.
Recruitment Infographic SWAT—MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository #116. Registered on 13 April 2020.
Retention Thank You Card SWAT—MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository #119. Registered on 13 April 2020.
Retention Newsletter SWAT—MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository #28. Registered on 01 July 2007.
Retention Pen SWAT—MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository #92. Registered on 01 April 2019.
Protocol version: V1.5, 26 May 2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Hall J, Buckley HL, Lamb KA, Stubbs N, Saramago P, Dumville JC, et al. Point prevalence of complex wounds in a defined United Kingdom population. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(6):694–700.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Gray TA, Rhodes S, Atkinson RA, Rothwell K, Wilson P, Dumville JC, et al. Opportunities for better value wound care: a multiservice, cross-sectional survey of complex wounds and their care in a UK community population. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3): e019440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Woo KY, Alavi A, Evans R, Despatis M, Allen J. New advances in compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:61–8.PubMed
5.
Shi C, Dumville JC, Cullum N, Connaughton E, Norman G. Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;7:CD013397.
6.
O'Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD000265.
7.
O’Meara S, Tierney J, Cullum N, Bland JM, Franks PJ, Mole T, et al. Four layer bandage compared with short stretch bandage for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with data from individual patients. BMJ. 2009;338: b1344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, Saramago P, Chuang LH, Adderley U, et al. VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV) - compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(57):1–293, v-vi.
9.
Dumville JC. VenUS 6: A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Stud Protoc. 2021.
10.
11.
Arundel C, Welch C, Saramago P, Adderley U, Atkinson RA, Chetter I, et al. A randomsied controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, three arm randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023;24:357.
12.
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350: h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J, Team RS. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–6.CrossRef
14.
Murtagh MJ, Thomson RG, May CR, Rapley T, Heaven BR, Graham RH, et al. Qualitative methods in a randomised controlled trial: the role of an integrated qualitative process evaluation in providing evidence to discontinue the intervention in one arm of a trial of a decision support tool. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(3):224–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346: e7586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Perry C, Atkinson RA, Griffiths J, Wilson PM, Lavallee JF, Cullum N, et al. Barriers and facilitators to use of compression therapy by people with venous leg ulcers: a qualitative exploration. J Adv Nurs. 2023;79(7):2568–84.
18.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994.
19.
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.
20.
Johnson R, Grove A, Clarke A. Pillar Integration Process: a joint display technique to integrate data in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2017;13(3):301–20.CrossRef
21.
Petersen D, Taylor E, Peikes D. The logic model: the foundation to implement, study, and refine patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2013.
22.
Ebenso B, Manzano A, Uzochukwu B, Etiaba E, Huss R, Ensor T, et al. Dealing with context in logic model development: reflections from a realist evaluation of a community health worker programme in Nigeria. Eval Program Plann. 2019;73:97–110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers: study protocol for a process evaluation in a randomised controlled trial, VenUS 6
Authors
Maartje Kletter
Jane Griffiths
Catherine Arundel
Jo Dumville
on behalf of the VenUS 6 Collaborators
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07681-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Trials 1/2023 Go to the issue

Study protocol

PROMISE: effect of protein supplementation on fat-free mass preservation after bariatric surgery, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Study protocol

The IBD-FITT study — moderate-intensity exercise for patients with inflammatory bowel disease with moderate disease activity: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Research

The detection and management of attempted fraud during an online randomised trial

Study protocol

An AI-based patient-specific clinical decision support system for OA patients choosing surgery or not: study protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Research

Comparing the effects of smartphone-based and face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation education on caregiver burden and quality of life among the family caregivers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled field trial

Research

Challenges and opportunities for conducting pre-hospital trauma trials: a behavioural investigation