Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Whooping Cough | Study protocol

Optimising DTwP-containing vaccine infant immunisation schedules (OptImms) — a protocol for two parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trials

Authors: Sarah Kelly, Xinxue Liu, Katherine Theiss-Nyland, Merryn Voysey, Sarah Murphy, Grace Li, Mary Nyantaro, Meeru Gurung, Sudha Basnet, Bhishma Pokhrel, Sanjeev M. Bijukchhe, Agnes Eordogh, Ben Gombe, Ayoub Kakande, Simon Kerridge, Geofrey Kimbugwe, Sylvia Kusemererwa, Lawrence Lubyayi, Henry Luzze, Olga Mazur, Yama F. Mujadidi, Shamim Nabukenya, Walter-Rodney Nagumo, Tryphena Nareeba, Rabiullah Noristani, Peter O’Reilly, Andrew Roberts, Ganesh Shah, Sonu Shrestha, Laxman P. Shrestha, Surya B. Thapa, Freddie M. Kibengo, Arun K. Sharma, Alison Elliott, Shrijana Shrestha, Andrew J. Pollard

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Universal immunisation is the cornerstone of preventive medicine for children, The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age as part of routine immunisation. However, globally, more than 17 unique DTP-containing vaccine schedules are in use. New vaccines for other diseases continue to be introduced into the infant immunisation schedule, resulting in an increasingly crowded schedule. The OptImms trial will assess whether antibody titres against pertussis and other antigens in childhood can be maintained whilst adjusting the current Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) schedule to provide space for the introduction of new vaccines.

Methods

The OptImms studies are two randomised, five-arm, non-inferiority clinical trials in Nepal and Uganda. Infants aged 6 weeks will be randomised to one of five primary vaccination schedules based on age at first DTwP-vaccination (6 versus 8 weeks of age), number of doses in the DTwP priming series (two versus three), and spacing of priming series vaccinations (4 versus 8 weeks). Additionally, participants will be randomised to receive their DTwP booster at 9 or 12 months of age. A further sub-study will compare the co-administration of typhoid vaccine with other routine vaccines at one year of age. The primary outcome is anti-pertussis toxin IgG antibodies measured at the time of the booster dose. Secondary outcomes include antibodies against other vaccine antigens in the primary schedule and their safety.

Discussion

These data will provide key data to inform policy decisions on streamlining vaccination schedules in childhood.

Trial registrations

ISRCTN12240140 (Nepa1, 7th January 2021) and ISRCTN6036654 (Uganda, 17th February 2021).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller E, Salisbury D, Ramsay M. Planning, registration, and implementation of an immunisation campaign against meningococcal serogroup C disease in the UK: a success story. Vaccine. 2001;20(SUPPL. 1):58–67.CrossRef Miller E, Salisbury D, Ramsay M. Planning, registration, and implementation of an immunisation campaign against meningococcal serogroup C disease in the UK: a success story. Vaccine. 2001;20(SUPPL. 1):58–67.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Broutin H, Viboud C, Grenfell BT, Miller MA, Rohani P. Impact of vaccination and birth rate on the epidemiology of pertussis: a comparative study in 64 countries. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277(1698):3239–45.CrossRef Broutin H, Viboud C, Grenfell BT, Miller MA, Rohani P. Impact of vaccination and birth rate on the epidemiology of pertussis: a comparative study in 64 countries. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277(1698):3239–45.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Funkhouser AW, Wassilak SGF, Orenstein WA, Hinman AR, Mortimer EA. Estimated effects of a delay in the recommended vaccination schedule for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1987;257(10):1341–6.CrossRef Funkhouser AW, Wassilak SGF, Orenstein WA, Hinman AR, Mortimer EA. Estimated effects of a delay in the recommended vaccination schedule for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1987;257(10):1341–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dayan GH, Thorley M, Yamamura Y, Rodriguez N, McLaughlin S, Torres LM, et al. Serologic response to inactivated poliovirus vaccine: a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 vaccination schedules in Puerto Rico. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed Dayan GH, Thorley M, Yamamura Y, Rodriguez N, McLaughlin S, Torres LM, et al. Serologic response to inactivated poliovirus vaccine: a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 vaccination schedules in Puerto Rico. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(1):12–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bakhache P, Rodrigo C, Davie S, Ahuja A, Sudovar B, Crudup T, et al. Health care providers’ and parents’ attitudes toward administration of new infant vaccines-a multinational survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(4):485–92.CrossRefPubMed Bakhache P, Rodrigo C, Davie S, Ahuja A, Sudovar B, Crudup T, et al. Health care providers’ and parents’ attitudes toward administration of new infant vaccines-a multinational survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(4):485–92.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference ECDC. Scientific panel on childhood immunisation schedule : ( DTP ) vaccination. 2009;0–40. ECDC. Scientific panel on childhood immunisation schedule : ( DTP ) vaccination. 2009;0–40.
10.
go back to reference Voysey M, Kelly DF, Fanshawe TR, Sadarangani M, O’Brien KL, Perera R, et al. The influence of maternally derived antibody and infant age at vaccination on infant vaccine responses: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(7):637–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Voysey M, Kelly DF, Fanshawe TR, Sadarangani M, O’Brien KL, Perera R, et al. The influence of maternally derived antibody and infant age at vaccination on infant vaccine responses: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(7):637–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Booy R, Taylor S, Tudor-Williams G, Moxon ER, Aitken SJM, Griffiths H, et al. Immunogenicity of combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine given at 2, 3, and 4 months versus 3, 5, and 9 months of age. Lancet. 1992;339(8792):507–10.CrossRefPubMed Booy R, Taylor S, Tudor-Williams G, Moxon ER, Aitken SJM, Griffiths H, et al. Immunogenicity of combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine given at 2, 3, and 4 months versus 3, 5, and 9 months of age. Lancet. 1992;339(8792):507–10.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Giammanco G, Moiraghi A, Zotti C, Pignato S, Li Volti S, Giammanco A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine administered according to two different primary vaccination schedules. Vaccine. 1998;16(7):722–6.CrossRefPubMed Giammanco G, Moiraghi A, Zotti C, Pignato S, Li Volti S, Giammanco A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine administered according to two different primary vaccination schedules. Vaccine. 1998;16(7):722–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Taranger J, Trollfors B, Knutsson N, Sundh V, Lagergård T, Østergaard E. Vaccination of infants with a four-dose and a three-dose vaccination schedule. Vaccine. 1999;18(9–10):884–91.CrossRefPubMed Taranger J, Trollfors B, Knutsson N, Sundh V, Lagergård T, Østergaard E. Vaccination of infants with a four-dose and a three-dose vaccination schedule. Vaccine. 1999;18(9–10):884–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Oosterhuis-Kafeja F, Beutels P, Van Damme P. Immunogenicity, efficacy, safety and effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (1998–2006). Vaccine. 2007;25(12):2194–212.CrossRefPubMed Oosterhuis-Kafeja F, Beutels P, Van Damme P. Immunogenicity, efficacy, safety and effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (1998–2006). Vaccine. 2007;25(12):2194–212.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hamaluba M, Kandasamy R, Upreti SR, Subedi GR, Shrestha S, Bhattarai S, et al. Comparison of two-dose priming plus 9-month booster with a standard three-dose priming schedule for a ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese infants: A randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(4):405–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70007-1.CrossRefPubMed Hamaluba M, Kandasamy R, Upreti SR, Subedi GR, Shrestha S, Bhattarai S, et al. Comparison of two-dose priming plus 9-month booster with a standard three-dose priming schedule for a ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Nepalese infants: A randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(4):405–14. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1473-3099(15)70007-1.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sparrow E, Adetifa I, Chaiyakunapruk N, Cherian T, Fell DB, Graham BS, et al. WHO preferred product characteristics for monoclonal antibodies for passive immunization against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease in infants – Key considerations for global use. Vaccine. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.040. Sparrow E, Adetifa I, Chaiyakunapruk N, Cherian T, Fell DB, Graham BS, et al. WHO preferred product characteristics for monoclonal antibodies for passive immunization against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease in infants – Key considerations for global use. Vaccine. 2022. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​vaccine.​2022.​02.​040.
20.
go back to reference Desai S, Rathi N, Kawade A, Venkatramanan P, Kundu R, Lalwani SK, et al. Non-interference of Bovine-Human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL® with the immunogenicity of infant vaccines in comparison with a licensed rotavirus vaccine. Vaccine. 2018;36(37):5519–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Desai S, Rathi N, Kawade A, Venkatramanan P, Kundu R, Lalwani SK, et al. Non-interference of Bovine-Human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL® with the immunogenicity of infant vaccines in comparison with a licensed rotavirus vaccine. Vaccine. 2018;36(37):5519–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Sharma H, Patil V, Sharma D, Kapre S, Jadhav S, Ravetkar S, et al. A phase III, randomized controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a semi-synthetic diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine in Indian infants. Vaccine. 2012;30(43):6157–62.CrossRefPubMed Sharma H, Patil V, Sharma D, Kapre S, Jadhav S, Ravetkar S, et al. A phase III, randomized controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a semi-synthetic diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine in Indian infants. Vaccine. 2012;30(43):6157–62.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kulkarni PS, Sapru A, Bavdekar A, Naik S, Patwardhan M, Barde P, et al. Immunogenicity of two diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B vaccines in infants: A comparative trial. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(9):941–4.CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni PS, Sapru A, Bavdekar A, Naik S, Patwardhan M, Barde P, et al. Immunogenicity of two diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B vaccines in infants: A comparative trial. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(9):941–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sharma HJ, Patil VD, Lalwani SK, Manglani MV, Ravichandran L, Kapre SV, et al. Assessment of safety and immunogenicity of two different lots of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine manufactured using small and large scale manufacturing process. Vaccine. 2012;30(3):510–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.067.CrossRefPubMed Sharma HJ, Patil VD, Lalwani SK, Manglani MV, Ravichandran L, Kapre SV, et al. Assessment of safety and immunogenicity of two different lots of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine manufactured using small and large scale manufacturing process. Vaccine. 2012;30(3):510–6. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​vaccine.​2011.​11.​067.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sharma H, Yadav S, Lalwani S, Gupta V, Kapre S, Jadhav S, et al. A phase III randomized, controlled study to assess the immunogenicity and tolerability of DTPw–HBV–Hib, a liquid pentavalent vaccine in Indian infants. Vaccine. 2011;29(13):2359–64.CrossRefPubMed Sharma H, Yadav S, Lalwani S, Gupta V, Kapre S, Jadhav S, et al. A phase III randomized, controlled study to assess the immunogenicity and tolerability of DTPw–HBV–Hib, a liquid pentavalent vaccine in Indian infants. Vaccine. 2011;29(13):2359–64.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sharma HJ, Yadav S, Lalwani SK, Kapre SV, Jadhav SS, Chakravarty A, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of an indigenously manufactured reconstituted pentavalent (DTwP-HBV+Hib) vaccine in comparison with a foreign competitor following primary and booster immunization in Indian children. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(4):451–7.CrossRefPubMed Sharma HJ, Yadav S, Lalwani SK, Kapre SV, Jadhav SS, Chakravarty A, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of an indigenously manufactured reconstituted pentavalent (DTwP-HBV+Hib) vaccine in comparison with a foreign competitor following primary and booster immunization in Indian children. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(4):451–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimising DTwP-containing vaccine infant immunisation schedules (OptImms) — a protocol for two parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trials
Authors
Sarah Kelly
Xinxue Liu
Katherine Theiss-Nyland
Merryn Voysey
Sarah Murphy
Grace Li
Mary Nyantaro
Meeru Gurung
Sudha Basnet
Bhishma Pokhrel
Sanjeev M. Bijukchhe
Agnes Eordogh
Ben Gombe
Ayoub Kakande
Simon Kerridge
Geofrey Kimbugwe
Sylvia Kusemererwa
Lawrence Lubyayi
Henry Luzze
Olga Mazur
Yama F. Mujadidi
Shamim Nabukenya
Walter-Rodney Nagumo
Tryphena Nareeba
Rabiullah Noristani
Peter O’Reilly
Andrew Roberts
Ganesh Shah
Sonu Shrestha
Laxman P. Shrestha
Surya B. Thapa
Freddie M. Kibengo
Arun K. Sharma
Alison Elliott
Shrijana Shrestha
Andrew J. Pollard
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07477-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Trials 1/2023 Go to the issue