Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Methodology

Creating a best practice template for participant communication plans in global health clinical studies

Authors: Colleen E. Shelly, Caroline Logan, Beth Skorochod, Alison Wiyeh, Duduzile Ndwandwe, Augustine Choko, Innocent Valea, Boghuma K. Titanji

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinical trial participants have a right to be informed throughout the entire process of human subject research. As part of this pillar of research ethics, participants and other stakeholders should be made aware of research findings after a trial has been completed. Though participants have both a right, and a desire to be informed of research outcomes, studies show that they rarely receive communication about study findings. Our aim was (1) to understand what, if any, role communication plans play in current global health clinical research protocols and (2) to use our findings to develop a communication plan template tailored to clinical research carried out in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) while minimizing colonial assumptions. While the template was drafted in the LMIC context, the principles are universally applicable and should be considered best practices for all global health clinical trials.

Methods

We carried out a mixed-method study over a period of 6 months to understand the role of communication with study participants and other stakeholders in clinical trials. The semiquantitative analysis included mining publicly available clinical trial protocols for communication-related language. Qualitative interviews (n = 7) were used to gather knowledge and insight from clinical trial experts to inform the development of a communication plan template.

Results

None of the 48 mined clinical trial protocols included a communication plan. Of the 48, 21% (n = 21) protocols included communication-related language, and 10% (n = 5) described plans to share trial results with participants.

Conclusion

The use of communication plans in global health clinical trials is lacking. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth analysis of communication plans in clinical trials to date. We recommend that researchers utilize the developed communication plan template throughout the entire research process to ensure a human-centered approach to participant communication. This communication plan should apply to all phases of a research trial, with a particular emphasis on plans to share results in an accessible and engaging manner once the trial has been completed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDavitt B, Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, Wagner GJ, Green HD Jr, Lawrence SJ, et al. Dissemination as dialogue: building trust and sharing research findings through community engagement. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDavitt B, Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, Wagner GJ, Green HD Jr, Lawrence SJ, et al. Dissemination as dialogue: building trust and sharing research findings through community engagement. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Melvin CL, Harvey J, Pittman T, Gentilin S, Burshell D, Kelechi T. Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020;4(3):233–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Melvin CL, Harvey J, Pittman T, Gentilin S, Burshell D, Kelechi T. Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020;4(3):233–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Medicine Io. Public engagement and clinical trials: new models and disruptive technologies: Workshop Summary. Weisfeld V, English RA, Claiborne AB, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. 140 Medicine Io. Public engagement and clinical trials: new models and disruptive technologies: Workshop Summary. Weisfeld V, English RA, Claiborne AB, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. 140
5.
go back to reference Long CR, Stewart MK, McElfish PA. Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed. Trials. 2017;18(1):449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long CR, Stewart MK, McElfish PA. Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed. Trials. 2017;18(1):449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Augustine EF, Dorsey ER, Hauser RA, Elm JJ, Tilley BC, Kieburtz KK. Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):592–6.CrossRefPubMed Augustine EF, Dorsey ER, Hauser RA, Elm JJ, Tilley BC, Kieburtz KK. Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):592–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Elzinga KE, Khan OF, Tang AR, Fernandez CV, Elzinga CL, Heng DY, et al. Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: a survey of cancer patients. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):574–81.CrossRefPubMed Elzinga KE, Khan OF, Tang AR, Fernandez CV, Elzinga CL, Heng DY, et al. Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: a survey of cancer patients. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):574–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Purvis RS, Abraham TH, Long CR, Stewart MK, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8(2):69–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Purvis RS, Abraham TH, Long CR, Stewart MK, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8(2):69–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Long CR, Stewart MK, Cunningham TV, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):582–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long CR, Stewart MK, Cunningham TV, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results. Clin Trials. 2016;13(6):582–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Schroter S, Price A, Malicki M, Richards T, Clarke M. Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10): e032701.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schroter S, Price A, Malicki M, Richards T, Clarke M. Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10): e032701.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference von Elm E, Meerpohl JJ. Trial results reporting: FDA Amendments Act Final Rule needs enforcement. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):316–7.CrossRef von Elm E, Meerpohl JJ. Trial results reporting: FDA Amendments Act Final Rule needs enforcement. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):316–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference DeVito NJ, Bacon S, Goldacre B. Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):361-9. DeVito NJ, Bacon S, Goldacre B. Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):361-9.
17.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Strengthening clinical trials1 to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. World Health Organization. 2022. World Health Organization. Strengthening clinical trials1 to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. World Health Organization. 2022.
19.
go back to reference Bedeker A, Nichols M, Allie T, Tamuhla T, van Heusden P, Olorunsogbon O, et al. A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(2):e008096.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bedeker A, Nichols M, Allie T, Tamuhla T, van Heusden P, Olorunsogbon O, et al. A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(2):e008096.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Diversity CoB. Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable shareing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity. 2011. Diversity CoB. Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable shareing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity. 2011.
22.
go back to reference Munung NS, de Vries J. Benefit sharing for human genomics research: awareness and expectations of genomics researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ethics Hum Res. 2020;42(6):14–20.CrossRefPubMed Munung NS, de Vries J. Benefit sharing for human genomics research: awareness and expectations of genomics researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ethics Hum Res. 2020;42(6):14–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Creating a best practice template for participant communication plans in global health clinical studies
Authors
Colleen E. Shelly
Caroline Logan
Beth Skorochod
Alison Wiyeh
Duduzile Ndwandwe
Augustine Choko
Innocent Valea
Boghuma K. Titanji
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07185-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Trials 1/2023 Go to the issue