Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Commentary

Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed

Authors: Christopher R. Long, M. Kathryn Stewart, Pearl A. McElfish

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Health research participants want the results of the studies in which they participate but do not typically receive them. Researchers generally express support for sharing results with participants but, in practice, may be unprepared or unwilling to do so. Many funders call for increased dissemination of research results beyond academic and clinical audiences, but few funders sponsor research to improve result sharing with participants. Although the solution appears straightforward (e.g., funders could incentivize researchers to share results with participants), there are critical gaps in knowledge that suggest the need for a more deliberate approach. For example, what ethical or practical concerns discourage researchers from returning results to participants? What exactly do participants plan to do with the results that they would like to receive? What are the best channels of communication for sharing results with particular participant populations? To address these knowledge gaps, we argue for a collaborative process to develop a research agenda related to result sharing with participants. With support and encouragement by funders, such research should evaluate the effects of different types of results (and results from different types of studies) on participants’ behaviors, attitudes, and emotions; it should also examine the researchers’ ethical, financial, logistical, methodological, and skill-related concerns and constraints related to sharing results with participants. Over time, collaborative research between researchers and participants can yield an evolving set of evidence-based guidelines for ethical, effective result sharing with participants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Augustine EF, Dorsey ER, Hauser RA, Elm JJ, Tilley BC, Kieburtz KK. Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2016;13:592–6.CrossRefPubMed Augustine EF, Dorsey ER, Hauser RA, Elm JJ, Tilley BC, Kieburtz KK. Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2016;13:592–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Elzinga KE, Khan OF, Tang AR, Fernandez CV, Elzinga CL, Heng DY, Vickers MM, Truong TH, Tang PA. Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: a survey of cancer patients. Clin Trials. 2016;13:574–81.CrossRefPubMed Elzinga KE, Khan OF, Tang AR, Fernandez CV, Elzinga CL, Heng DY, Vickers MM, Truong TH, Tang PA. Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: a survey of cancer patients. Clin Trials. 2016;13:574–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Long CR, Stewart MK, Cunningham TV, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results. Clin Trials. 2016;13:582–91.CrossRefPubMed Long CR, Stewart MK, Cunningham TV, Warmack TS, McElfish PA. Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results. Clin Trials. 2016;13:582–91.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Purvis RS, Abraham TH, Long CR, Stewart MK, Warmack TS, Mcelfish PA. Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8:69–74. Purvis RS, Abraham TH, Long CR, Stewart MK, Warmack TS, Mcelfish PA. Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8:69–74.
6.
go back to reference Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:372–8.CrossRefPubMed Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:372–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Lorimer K, Gray CM, Hunt K, Wyke S, Anderson A, Benzeval M. Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lorimer K, Gray CM, Hunt K, Wyke S, Anderson A, Benzeval M. Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Miller FA, Christensen R, Giacomini M, Robert JS. Duty to disclose what? querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:210–3.CrossRefPubMed Miller FA, Christensen R, Giacomini M, Robert JS. Duty to disclose what? querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:210–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:2.CrossRef Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:2.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lidz CW, Albert K, Appelbaum P, Dunn LB, Overton E, Pivovarova E. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015;24:231–41.CrossRefPubMed Lidz CW, Albert K, Appelbaum P, Dunn LB, Overton E, Pivovarova E. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015;24:231–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chung W, Kim H, Nam CM. Breast-feeding in South Korea: factors influencing its initiation and duration. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:225–9.CrossRefPubMed Chung W, Kim H, Nam CM. Breast-feeding in South Korea: factors influencing its initiation and duration. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:225–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Baylor A, Muzoora C, Bwana M, Kembabazi A, Haberer JE, Matthews LT, Tsai AC, Hunt PW, Martin JN, Bangsberg DR. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: challenges and rewards. PLOS Med. 2013;10:4.CrossRef Baylor A, Muzoora C, Bwana M, Kembabazi A, Haberer JE, Matthews LT, Tsai AC, Hunt PW, Martin JN, Bangsberg DR. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: challenges and rewards. PLOS Med. 2013;10:4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gikonyo C, Kamuya D, Mbete B, Njuguna P, Olotu A, Bejon P, Marsh V, Molyneux S. Feedback of research findings for vaccine trials: experiences from two malaria vaccine trials involving healthy children on the Kenyan coast. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13:48–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gikonyo C, Kamuya D, Mbete B, Njuguna P, Olotu A, Bejon P, Marsh V, Molyneux S. Feedback of research findings for vaccine trials: experiences from two malaria vaccine trials involving healthy children on the Kenyan coast. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13:48–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Laurie G. Recognizing the right not to know: conceptual, professional, and legal implications. J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42:53–63.CrossRefPubMed Laurie G. Recognizing the right not to know: conceptual, professional, and legal implications. J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42:53–63.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fernandez CV, Ruccione K, Wells RJ, Long JB, Pelletier W, Hooke MC, Pentz RD, Noll RB, Baker JN, O’Leary M, et al. Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4573–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fernandez CV, Ruccione K, Wells RJ, Long JB, Pelletier W, Hooke MC, Pentz RD, Noll RB, Baker JN, O’Leary M, et al. Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4573–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed
Authors
Christopher R. Long
M. Kathryn Stewart
Pearl A. McElfish
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2200-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue