Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Long-COVID Syndrome | Study protocol

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for living with long COVID: protocol for the LISTEN randomised controlled trial

Authors: Claire Potter, Fiona Leggat, Rachel Lowe, Philip Pallmann, Muhammad Riaz, Christy Barlow, Adrian Edwards, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Nick Sevdalis, Bernadette Sewell, Jackie McRae, Jessica Fish, Maria Ines de Sousa de Abreu, Fiona Jones, Monica Busse

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Individuals living with long COVID experience multiple, interacting and fluctuating symptoms which can have a dramatic impact on daily living. The aim of the Long Covid Personalised Self-managemenT support EvaluatioN (LISTEN) trial is to evaluate effects of the LISTEN co-designed self-management support intervention for non-hospitalised people living with long COVID on participation in routine activities, social participation, emotional well-being, quality of life, fatigue, and self-efficacy. Cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated, and a detailed process evaluation carried out to understand how LISTEN is implemented.

Methods

The study is a pragmatic randomised effectiveness and cost-effectiveness trial in which a total of 558 non-hospitalised people with long COVID will be randomised to either the LISTEN intervention or usual care. Recruitment strategies have been developed with input from the LISTEN Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) advisory group and a social enterprise, Diversity and Ability, to ensure inclusivity. Eligible participants can self-refer into the trial via a website or be referred by long COVID services. All participants complete a range of self-reported outcome measures, online, at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months post randomisation (the trial primary end point). Those randomised to the LISTEN intervention are offered up to six one-to-one sessions with LISTEN-trained intervention practitioners and given a co-designed digital resource and paper-based book. A detailed process evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial to inform implementation approaches should the LISTEN intervention be found effective and cost-effective.

Discussion

The LISTEN trial is evaluating a co-designed, personalised self-management support intervention (the LISTEN intervention) for non-hospitalised people living with long COVID. The design has incorporated extensive strategies to minimise participant burden and maximise access. Whilst the duration of follow-up is limited, all participants are approached to consent for long-term follow-up (subject to additional funding being secured).

Trial registration

LISTEN ISRCTN36407216. Registered on 27/01/2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2020;268:113425. Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2020;268:113425.
3.
go back to reference Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. eClin Med. 2021;38:101019. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. eClin Med. 2021;38:101019.
4.
go back to reference Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Turner G, et al. Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review. J R Soc Med. 2021;114:428–42.CrossRef Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Turner G, et al. Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review. J R Soc Med. 2021;114:428–42.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kulnik ST, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L, Hammond J, Jones F. Implementing an interprofessional model of self-management support across a community workforce: a mixed-methods evaluation study. J Interprof Care. 2016;31:75.CrossRef Kulnik ST, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L, Hammond J, Jones F. Implementing an interprofessional model of self-management support across a community workforce: a mixed-methods evaluation study. J Interprof Care. 2016;31:75.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jones F, Gage H, Drummond A, Bhalla A, Grant R, Lennon S, et al. Feasibility study of an integrated stroke self-management programme: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6:1.CrossRef Jones F, Gage H, Drummond A, Bhalla A, Grant R, Lennon S, et al. Feasibility study of an integrated stroke self-management programme: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6:1.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jones F, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L. Building bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: a coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39:471–80.CrossRef Jones F, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L. Building bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: a coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39:471–80.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heaton-Shrestha C, Torrens-Burton A, Leggat F, Islam I, Busse M, Jones F. Co-designing personalised self-management support for people living with long Covid: the LISTEN protocol. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0274469.CrossRef Heaton-Shrestha C, Torrens-Burton A, Leggat F, Islam I, Busse M, Jones F. Co-designing personalised self-management support for people living with long Covid: the LISTEN protocol. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0274469.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reynolds R, Dennis S, Hasan I, Slewa J, Chen W, Tian D, et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19:11.CrossRef Reynolds R, Dennis S, Hasan I, Slewa J, Chen W, Tian D, et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19:11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Innov Prim Care. 2002;288:2469–75. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Innov Prim Care. 2002;288:2469–75.
13.
go back to reference Mäkelä P, Jones F, Sousa De Abreu MI, Hollinshead L, Ling J. Supporting self-management after traumatic brain injury: Codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway. Health Expect. 2019;22:632.CrossRef Mäkelä P, Jones F, Sousa De Abreu MI, Hollinshead L, Ling J. Supporting self-management after traumatic brain injury: Codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway. Health Expect. 2019;22:632.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e758.CrossRef Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e758.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bandura A. The nature and structure of self-efficacy. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997. Bandura A. The nature and structure of self-efficacy. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
21.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRef Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2010;38:65.CrossRef Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2010;38:65.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12:108.CrossRef Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12:108.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, O’Connell Francischetto E, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:2.CrossRef Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, O’Connell Francischetto E, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:2.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Jenkinson C. Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire (ox-PAQ). Patient Related Outcomes. 2019;17(10):153–6.CrossRef Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Jenkinson C. Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire (ox-PAQ). Patient Related Outcomes. 2019;17(10):153–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Self efficacy measurement: generalized self-efficacy scale (GSES). In: Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1995. p. 35–7. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Self efficacy measurement: generalized self-efficacy scale (GSES). In: Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1995. p. 35–7.
31.
go back to reference Moerbeek M, Wong WK. Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model. Stat Med. 2008;27(15):2850–64.CrossRef Moerbeek M, Wong WK. Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model. Stat Med. 2008;27(15):2850–64.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008;42(2):377–81.CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008;42(2):377–81.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Flight L, Allison A, Dimairo M, Lee E, Mandefield L, Walters SJ. Recommendations for the analysis of individually randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm – a case of continuous outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:165.CrossRef Flight L, Allison A, Dimairo M, Lee E, Mandefield L, Walters SJ. Recommendations for the analysis of individually randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm – a case of continuous outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:165.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Candlish J, Teare MD, Dimairo M, Flight L, Mandefield L, Walters SJ. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:105.CrossRef Candlish J, Teare MD, Dimairo M, Flight L, Mandefield L, Walters SJ. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:105.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17:75.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17:75.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:42.CrossRef Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for living with long COVID: protocol for the LISTEN randomised controlled trial
Authors
Claire Potter
Fiona Leggat
Rachel Lowe
Philip Pallmann
Muhammad Riaz
Christy Barlow
Adrian Edwards
Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
Nick Sevdalis
Bernadette Sewell
Jackie McRae
Jessica Fish
Maria Ines de Sousa de Abreu
Fiona Jones
Monica Busse
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07090-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Trials 1/2023 Go to the issue