Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

National profile of foot orthotic provision in the United Kingdom, part 1: practitioners and scope of practice

Authors: CJ Nester, A Graham, A Martinez-Santos, AE Williams, J McAdam, V Newton

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Foot orthoses have been advocated in the management of a wide range of clinical foot and lower limb problems and are within the scope of podiatry, orthotic and physiotherapy practice. Previous reports into the provision of orthoses have consistently identified significant issues with services and devices, but data were never specific to foot orthoses. The aim of this first of a series of papers was to report the first ever national multi professional profile of foot orthosis provision in the United Kingdom.

Methods

Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from podiatrists, orthotists and physiotherapists via an online questionnaire. The topics, questions and answers were developed through a series of pilot phases. The professions were targeted through electronic and printed materials. Data were captured over a 10 month period in 2016.

Results

A total of 499 responses were included in analysis, including 357 podiatrists, 93 orthotists and 49 physiotherapists. The results reveal wide ranging practices across podiatrists, orthotists and physiotherapists, provision of orthoses through different health care departments (uni and multidisciplinary), for different health conditions (acute and chronic), and involving different types of orthoses (prefabricated and customised).

Conclusion

Foot orthoses in the United Kingdom are provided in areas of well recognised health and rehabilitation priorities. A wide range of orthotic devices and practices are employed and different professions provide foot orthoses in different ways.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Chalmers AC, Busby C, Goyert J, Porter B, Schulzer M. Metatarsalgia and rheumatoid arthritis--a randomized, single blind, sequential trial comparing 2 types of foot orthoses and supportive shoes. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1643–7.PubMed
2.
Chapman GJ, Halstead J, Redmond AC. Comparability of off the shelf foot orthoses in the redistribution of forces in midfoot osteoarthritis patients. Gait Posture. 2016;49:235–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Maddali Bongi S, Del Rosso A, Mikhaylova S, Landi G, Ferretti B, Cavigli E, et al. A comparison of two podiatric protocols for metatarsalgia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32:855–63.PubMed
4.
Menz HB, Auhl M, Tan JM, Levinger P, Roddy E, Munteanu SE. Biomechanical effects of prefabricated foot Orthoses and rocker-sole footwear in individuals with first Metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68:603–11.CrossRef
5.
Munteanu SE, Scott LA, Bonanno DR, Landorf KB, Pizzari T, Cook JL, et al. Effectiveness of customised foot orthoses for Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:989–94.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Crossley KM, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, Collins NJ, Rathleff MS, Barton CJ. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th international Patellofemoral pain research retreat, Manchester. Part 2: recommended physical interventions (exercise, taping, bracing, foot orthoses and combined interventions). Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:844–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Chuter V, Spink M, Searle A, Ho A. The effectiveness of shoe insoles for the prevention and treatment of low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Gelis A, Coudeyre E, Hudry C, Pelissier J, Revel M, Rannou F. Is there an evidence-based efficacy for the use of foot orthotics in knee and hip osteoarthritis? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:714–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Gross KD, Niu J, Zhang YQ, Felson DT, McLennan C, Hannan MT, et al. Varus foot alignment and hip conditions in older adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:2993–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Papuga MO, Cambron J. Foot orthotics for low back pain: the state of our understanding and recommendations for future research. Foot (Edinb). 2016;26:53–7.CrossRef
11.
12.
13.
Williams AE, Davies S, Graham A, Dagg A, Longrigg K, Lyons C, et al. Guidelines for the management of the foot health problems associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care. 2011;9:86–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Guldemond NA, Leffers P, Schaper NC, Sanders AP, Nieman FH, Walenkamp GH. Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Kane K. Foot orthoses for pediatric flexible flatfoot: evidence and current practices among Canadian physical therapists. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2015;27:53–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Disabled Living Foundation. Footwear: A Quality Issue - Provision of Prescribed Footwear Within the National Health Service. 1991.
18.
19.
Bowker P, Rocca E, Powell E. A study of the organisation of orthotic services in England and Wales. UK: Report to the Department of Health; 1992.
20.
Audit Commission. Assisting independence - fully equipped. 2002.
21.
Landorf K, Keenan AM, Rushworth RL. Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91:174–83.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Reja U, Manfreda K, Hlebec V, Vehovar V. Open-ended versus closed-ended questions in web questionnaries: advances in methodology and satistics. Metodoloski zvezki. 2003;19:159–77.
23.
24.
25.
Workforce and Facilities Team. NHS Workforce Statistics, February 2016, Provisional Statistics February 2016.
26.
Sharman A. NHS England. Personal Communication, January 2017.
27.
28.
29.
van Netten JJ, Price PE, Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M, Rasmussen A, Jubiz Y, et al. Prevention of foot ulcers in the at-risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):84–98.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Bus SA, Waaijman R, Arts M, de Haart M, Busch-Westbroek T, van Baal J, et al. Effect of custom-made footwear on foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:4109–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Carroll M, Annabell ME, Rome K. Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;4:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Telfer S, Abbott M, Steultjens MP, Woodburn J. Dose-response effects of customised foot orthoses on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in pronated foot type. J Biomech. 2013;46:1489–95.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Bonanno DR, Zhang CY, Farrugia RC, Bull MG, Raspovic AM, Bird AR, et al. The effect of different depths of medial heel skive on plantar pressures. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012;5:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Wen DY, Puffer JC, Schmalzried TP. Lower extremity alignment and risk of overuse injuries in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:1291–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Nielsen RO, Buist I, Parner ET, Nohr EA, Sorensen H, Lind M, et al. Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:440–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Wallden M. Don’t get caught flat footed - how over-pronation may just be a dysfunctional model. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19:357–61.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Nester CJ, Jarvis HL, Jones RK, Bowden PD, Liu A. Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18-45: implications for understanding normal foot function. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:51.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Metadata
Title
National profile of foot orthotic provision in the United Kingdom, part 1: practitioners and scope of practice
Authors
CJ Nester
A Graham
A Martinez-Santos
AE Williams
J McAdam
V Newton
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0215-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Clinical photographic observation of plantar corns and callus associated with a nominal scale classification and inter- observer reliability study in a student population

Research

Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function

Research

Repeatability and agreement of ultrasonography with computed tomography for evaluating forefoot structure in the coronal plane

Research

Evidence for current recommendations concerning the management of foot health for people with chronic long-term conditions: a systematic review

Research

Prevalence, impact and care of foot problems in people with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a United Kingdom based cross-sectional survey

Research

Coordination among the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during walking