Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research article

Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands

Authors: Nick A Guldemond, Pieter Leffers, Nicolaas C Schaper, Antal P Sanders, Fred HM Nieman, Geert HIM Walenkamp

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a need for evidence of clinical effectiveness of foot orthosis therapy. This study evaluated the effect of foot orthoses made by ten podiatrists, ten pedorthists and eleven orthotists on plantar pressure and walking convenience for three patients with metatarsalgia. Aims were to assess differences and variability between and within the disciplines. The relationship between the importance of pressure reduction and the effect on peak pressure was also evaluated.

Methods

Each therapist examined all three patients and was asked to rate the 'importance of pressure reduction' through a visual analogue scale. The orthoses were evaluated twice in two sessions while the patient walked on a treadmill. Plantar pressures were recorded with an in-sole measuring system. Patients scored walking convenience per orthosis. The effects of the orthoses on peak pressure reduction were calculated for the whole plantar surface of the forefoot and six regions: big toe and metatarsal one to five.

Results

Within each discipline there was an extensive variation in construction of the orthoses and achieved peak pressure reductions. Pedorthists and orthotists achieved greater maximal peak pressure reductions calculated over the whole forefoot than podiatrists: 960, 1020 and 750 kPa, respectively (p < .001). This was also true for the effect in the regions with the highest baseline peak pressures and walking convenience rated by patients A and B. There was a weak relationship between the 'importance of pressure reduction' and the achieved pressure reduction for orthotists, but no relationship for podiatrists and pedorthotists.

Conclusion

The large variation for various aspects of foot orthoses therapy raises questions about a consistent use of concepts for pressures management within the professional groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Bardelli M, Turelli L, Scoccianti G: Definition and classification of metatarsalgia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003, 9: 79–85-
2.
Poon C, Love B: Efficacy of foot orthosis for metatarsalgia. The Foot. 1999
3.
Ivanic GM, Trnka HJ, Homann NC: [Post-traumatic metatarsalgia. Early results of treatment with a new insole]. Unfallchirurg. 2000, 103: 507-510.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM: novel Award First Prize Paper. Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999, 14: 567-575.CrossRef
5.
Chang AH, Abu-Faraj ZU, Harris GF, Nery J, Shereff MJ: Multistep measurement of plantar pressure alterations using metatarsal pads. Foot Ankle Int. 1994, 15: 654-660.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Woodburn J, Barker S, Helliwell PS: A randomized controlled trial of foot orthoses in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002, 29: 1377-1383.PubMed
7.
Novick A, Stone J, Birke JA, Brasseaux DM, Broussard JB, Hoard AS, Hawkins ES: Reduction of plantar pressure with the rigid relief orthosis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993, 83: 115-122.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bitzan P, Giurea A, Wanivenhaus A: Plantar pressure distribution after resection of the metatarsal heads in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997, 18: 391-397.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Jackson L, Binning J, Potter J: Plantar pressures in rheumatoid arthritis using prefabricated metatarsal padding. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004, 94: 239-245.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kavlak Y, Uygur F, Korkmaz C, Bek N: Outcome of orthoses intervention in the rheumatoid foot. Foot Ankle Int. 2003, 24: 494-499.PubMed
11.
Landorf K, Keenan AM, Rushworth RL: Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001, 91: 174-183.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Boer H, Seydel ER: Medical opinions, beliefs and prescription of orthopaedic footwear: a survey of Dutch orthopaedists and rehabilitation practitioners. Clin Rehabil. 1998, 12: 245-253.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Morris C, Newdick H, Johnson A: Variations in the orthotic management of cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2002, 28: 139-147.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bakker JP, De Groot IJ, De Jong BA, Van Tol-De Jager MA, Lankhorst GJ: Prescription pattern for orthoses in The Netherlands: use and experience in the ambulatory phase of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disabil Rehabil. 1997, 19: 318-325.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Hopson MM, McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: Motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Reliability and validity of four measurement techniques. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1995, 85: 198-204.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Ball P, Johnson GR: Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996, 11: 165-169.CrossRef
17.
Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther. 1988, 68: 672-677.PubMed
18.
Buckley RE, Hunt DV: Reliability of clinical measurement of subtalar joint movement. Foot Ankle Int. 1997, 18: 229-232.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Menz HB, Tiedemann A, Kwan MM, Latt MD, Sherrington C, Lord SR: Reliability of clinical tests of foot and ankle characteristics in older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003, 93: 380-387.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Thompson L, Nester C, Stuart L, Wiles P: Interclinician variation in diabetes foot assessment - a national lottery?. Diabet Med. 2005, 22 (2): 196-199.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Thompson L, Nester C, Stuart L, Wiles P: Interclinician variation in diabetes foot assessment--a national lottery?. Diabet Med. 2005, 22: 196-199.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB: Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position. Foot Ankle Int. 1996, 17: 406-412.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB: Effect of patient position on the consistency of placing the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1997, 87: 399-406.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Chuter V, Payne C, Miller K: Variability of neutral-position casting of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003, 93: 1-5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zuijderduin WM, Dekker J: Diagnoses and interventions in podiatry. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1996, 18: 27-34.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kruizinga CP, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, Elzinga A, Goeken NLH: Characteristics of patients supplied with foot orthoses from orthopaedic workshops in The Netherlands. The Foot. 2003, 13: 39-45.CrossRef
27.
Kernozek TW, LaMott EE, Dancisak MJ: Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1996, 17: 204-209.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Boyd LA, Bontrager EL, Sara MS, Perry J: The reliability and validity of the Novel Pedar system of in-shoe pressure measurement duringfree ambulation. Gait & Posture. 1997, 5: 165-CrossRef
29.
Weijers RE, Walenkamp GHIM, Mameren van H, Kessels AG: The relationship of the position of the metatarsal heads and peak plantar pressure. Foot and Ankle Int. 2003, 24: 349-353.
30.
Crick JE, Brennan RL: GENOVA: a GENeral purpose analysis Of VAriance system. 1984, version 2.2.
31.
Root ML: Development of the functional orthosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994, 11: 183-210.PubMed
32.
Bernard MA, Goldsmith H, Curnick KL, Jarret B: Prescription of custom foot orthoses practice guidelines. 2002, Ellicott City, MD 21043-4547, The American College Of Foot And Ankle Orthopedics & Medicine, 32-
33.
Price J: Clinical guidelines for orthotic therapy provided by podiatrists. 1998, 41 Derby Street, Collingwood Vic 3066 AUS, Australian Podiatry Council
34.
Lelièvre J, Lelièvre JF: Pathologie du Pied. 1981, Paris, Masson éditeur, 5ème ed.
35.
Martorell Martorell J: Nouvelle semelle pour métatarsalgie. Podologie. 1968, 6: 419-
36.
Lavigne A, Noviel D: Nouvelles thérapeutiques en podologie. 1973, Paris, Morgan
37.
Lavigne A, Noviel D: Traite théorique et pratique de la semelle orthopédique. 1975, Boulogne, Scerdes
38.
Moraros J, Hodge W: Orthotic survey. Preliminary results. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993, 83: 139-148.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH: Normal and abnormal function of the foot. 1977, Los Angeles CA., Clinical Biomechanics Corporation Publishers
40.
Armstrong DG, Liswood PJ, Todd WF: Potential risks of accommodative padding in the treatment of neuropathic ulcerations. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995, 41: 44-6, 48-9.PubMed
41.
Martin N, Oldani T, Claxton MJ: A Guide To Offloading The Diabetic Foot. Podiatry Today. 2005, 18: 67-74.
42.
Guldemond NA, Leffers P, Sanders AP, Schaper NC, Walenkamp GHIM: Clinical proficiency of Dutch podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction [Abstract], Novel EMED scientific meeting 2004, Leeds UK. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005, 20: S14-
43.
Pratt DJ: A critical review of the literature on foot orthoses. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000, 90: 339-341.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Spencer S: Pressure relieving intervention for preventing and treating diabetic foot ulcers (Cochrane Review). 2001, Oxford, The Cochrane Library, 14-
45.
Dahle LK, Michael MJ: Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1991, 14: 70-74.CrossRef
46.
Cornwall MW, McPoil TG: Footwear and foot orthotic effectiveness research: a new approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995, 21: 337-344.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Landorf KB, Keenan AM: Efficacy of foot orthoses: What does the literature tell us?. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000, 90: 149-158.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB, Mlynarczyk JH: Proficiency of foot care specialists to place the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1996, 86: 217-223.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Payne CB: The past, present, and future of podiatric biomechanics. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998, 88: 53-63.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Laughton C, McClay Davis I, Williams DS: A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002, 92: 261-268.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Lee WE: Podiatric biomechanics. An historical appraisal and discussion of the Root model as a clinical system of approach in the present context of theoretical uncertainty. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2001, 18: 555-684; discussion 685-90, v.PubMed
52.
Miller M, McGuire J: Literature reveals no consensus on subtalar neutral. Biomechanics. 2000, 7: 63-74.
53.
Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL, Riddle DL: Methods for taking subtalar joint measurements. A clinical report. Phys Ther. 1988, 68: 678-682.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands
Authors
Nick A Guldemond
Pieter Leffers
Nicolaas C Schaper
Antal P Sanders
Fred HM Nieman
Geert HIM Walenkamp
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-61

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2005 Go to the issue

Research article

The effectiveness of extra corporeal shock wave therapy for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research article

Evaluation of easily measured risk factors in the prediction of osteoporotic fractures

Research article

Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children

Technical advance

A sonography assisted technique for the removal of a femoral interlocking nail – a technical note

Research article

Dynamic in vitro measurement of patellar movement after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study

Research article

Quadriceps force generation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and asymptomatic participants during patellar tendon reflex reactions: an exploratory cross-sectional study