Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Flexible assertive community treatment teams can change complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of service providers

Authors: Kristin Trane, Kristian Aasbrenn, Martin Rønningen, Sigrun Odden, Annika Lexén, Anne Landheim

Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implementing innovative health service models in existing service systems is complicated and context dependent. Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) is a multidisciplinary service model aimed at providing integrated care for people with severe mental illness. The model was developed in the Netherlands and is now used in several countries, such as Norway. The Norwegian service system is complex and fragmented, with challenges in collaboration. Limited research has been performed on FACT teams and other new integrative health service models as part of such systems. However, such knowledge is important for future adjustments of innovation processes and service systems. Our aim was to explore how FACT teams are integrated into the existing formal public service system, how they function and affect the system, and describe some influencing factors to this. We sought to address how service providers in the existing service system experience the functioning of FACT teams in the system.

Methods

Five focus group interviews were undertaken 3 years after the FACT teams were implemented. Forty service providers representing different services from both levels of administration (primary and specialist healthcare) from different Norwegian regions participated in this study. Team leaders of the FACT teams also participated. Service providers were recruited through purposeful sampling. Interviews were analysed using thematic text analysis.

Results

The analysis revealed five main themes regarding FACT teams: (1) They form a bridge between different services; (2) They collaborate with other services; (3) They undertake responsibility and reassure other services; (4) They do not close all gaps in service systems; and (5) They are part of a service system that hampers their functioning.

Conclusions

The FACT teams in this study contributed to positive changes in the existing service system. They largely contributed to less complex and fragmented systems by forming a bridge and undertaking responsibility in the system and by collaborating with and reassuring other services; this has reduced some gaps in the system. The way FACT teams function and needs of the existing system appear to have contributed positively to these findings. However, complexity and fragmentation of the system partly hamper functioning of the FACT teams.
Literature
1.
Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernandez D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj SI. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Atun R. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(suppl_4):iv4-8.PubMed
3.
Dryden-Palmer K, Parshuram C, Berta W. Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
van Veldhuizen J, Bahler M. Manual: flexible assertive community treatment: vision, model, practice and organization. CCAF. 2013;52:898–907.
5.
6.
Svensson B, Hansson L, Lexen A. Outcomes of clients in need of intensive team care in flexible assertive community treatment in Sweden. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72(3):226–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Svensson B, Hansson L, Markström U, Lexén A. What matters when implementing flexible assertive community treatment in a Swedish healthcare context: a two-year implementation study. Int J Ment Health. 2017;46:1–15.CrossRef
8.
Nielsen CM, Hjorthøj C, Killaspy H, Nordentoft M. The effect of flexible assertive community treatment in Denmark: a quasi-experimental controlled study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;8(1):27–35.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Ruimveld J, Bosma M, Hermanides R, van Os J, Becker H, Mauricio M, et al. Mental health in Bonaire-an inspiration for the Dutch new mental health movement. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60(7):462–70.PubMed
10.
Delespaul P. Belgian FACT teams: looking for assurance of good care. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60:386–7.PubMed
11.
Stergiopoulos V, Saab D, Francombe Pridham K, Aery A, Nakhost A. Building flexibility and managing complexity in community mental health: lessons learned in a large urban centre. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Neijmeijer LJ, Didden R, Nijman HLI, Kroon H. Assertive community treatment for people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and mental health problems or challenging behavior: state of the art and implementation in the Netherlands. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2018;15(4):329–42.CrossRef
13.
Nakhost A, Law SF, Francombe Pridham KM, Stergiopoulos V. Addressing complexity and improving access in community mental health services: an inner-city adaptation of flexible ACT. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(9):867–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
De Vries H, Bekkers V, Tummers L. Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration. 2016;94(1):146–66.CrossRef
15.
Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(2):123–57.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Amelung V, Stein V, Goodwin N, Balicer R, Nolte E, Suter E. Handbook Integrated Care. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
17.
Misra-Hebert AD, Perzynski A, Rothberg MB, Fox J, Mercer MB, Liu X, et al. Implementing team-based primary care models: a mixed-methods comparative case study in a large, integrated health care system. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(11):1928–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Westen KH, van Vugt MD, Bähler M, Mulder CL, Delespaul PH, Kroon H. Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) as part of a community (health) network. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(4):298–303.PubMed
19.
Fuglsang L, Rønning R. Introduction. In: Fuglsang L, Rønning R, Enquist B, editors. Framing Innovation in Public Service Sectors. New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 1–11.
20.
Cinar E, Trott P, Simms C. A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Manag Rev. 2019;21(2):264–90.CrossRef
21.
Van de Ven AH. The innovation journey: you can’t control it, but you can learn to maneuver it. Innovation. 2017;19(1):39–42.CrossRef
22.
Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(2):107–23.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Moulton S, Sandfort JR. The strategic action field framework for policy implementation research. Policy Stud J. 2017;45(1):144–69.CrossRef
24.
Hanlon N, Reay T, Snadden D, MacLeod M. Creating partnerships to achieve health care reform: moving beyond a politics of scale? Int J Health Serv. 2019;49(1):51–67.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Van de Ven AH, Sun K. Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. Acad Manag Perspect. 2011;25(3):58–74.
26.
Hartley J. Public and Private Features of Innovation. In: Osborne S, Brown L, editors. Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013. p. 44–59.CrossRef
27.
Kotter J, Schlesinger L. Choosing Strategies for Change. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(7):130–9.
28.
De Savigny D, Adam T. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. World Health Organization; 2009.
29.
Goodwin N. Change Management. Handbook Integrated Care. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 253–75.CrossRef
30.
31.
Lehoux P, Roncarolo F, Silva HP, Boivin A, Denis J-L, Hébert R. What health system challenges should responsible innovation in health address? Insights from an international scoping review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(2):63–75.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Oreg S. Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2006;15(1):73–101.CrossRef
33.
Markström U. Staying the course? Challenges in implementing evidence-based programs in community mental health services. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(10):10752–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Markström U, Lindqvist R, Sandlund M. Case management for people with psychiatric disabilities in rural Sweden; experiences from the implementation of a national policy. Eur J Soc Work. 2009;12(4):495–508.CrossRef
35.
Bergmark M, Bejerholm U, Svensson B, Markström U. Complex interventions and interorganisational relationships: examining core implementation components of assertive community treatment. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(4):11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Nelson-Cooke E. Olmstead mandated statewide implementation of assertive community treatment: precipitating factors and participant experiences [doctoral dissertation]. Lexington: University of Kentucky; 2020.
37.
Kelly BJ, Perkins DA, Fuller JD, Parker SM. Shared care in mental illness: a rapid review to inform implementation. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011;5(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
39.
Odden S, Landheim A, Clausen H, Stuen HK, Heiervang KS, Ruud T. Model fidelity and team members’ experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13(1):65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Lee SJ, Crowther E, Keating C, Kulkarni J. What is needed to deliver collaborative care to address comorbidity more effectively for adults with a severe mental illness? The Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013;47(4):333–46.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Benoit F, Lesage A. Implementation of intensive follow-up in the community: lessons to be considered. Can J Psychiatry. 1999;44(8):781–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Amodeo M, Lundgren L, Cohen A, Rose D, Chassler D, Beltrame C, et al. Barriers to implementing evidence-based practices in addiction treatment programs: comparing staff reports on motivational interviewing, adolescent community reinforcement approach, assertive community treatment, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34(4):382–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Rochefort DA. Innovation and its discontents: pathways and barriers in the diffusion of assertive community treatment. Milbank Q. 2019;97(4):1151–99.PubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Hannigan B, Coffey M. Where the wicked problems are: the case of mental health. Health Policy. 2011;101(3):220–7.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Ellis LA, Churruca K, Braithwaite J. Mental health services conceptualised as complex adaptive systems: what can be learned? Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017;11(1):43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Beere D, Page IS, Diminic S, Harris M. A mixed methods evaluation of an integrated adult mental health service model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Rodgers M, Dalton J, Harden M, Street A, Parker G, Eastwood A. Integrated care to address the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness: a mapping review of the recent evidence on barriers, facilitators and evaluations. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Melamed OC, Fernando I, Soklaridis S, Hahn MK, LeMessurier KW, Taylor VH. Understanding engagement with a physical health service: a qualitative study of patients with severe mental illness. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64(12):872–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
50.
Triliva S, Ntani S, Giovazolias T, Kafetsios K, Axelsson M, Bockting C, et al. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on mental health service provision: a pilot focus group study in six European countries. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):1–18.CrossRef
51.
Isaacs S, Jellinek P, Martinez Garcel J, Hunt KA, Bunch W. New York state health foundation: integrating mental health and substance abuse care. Health Aff. 2013;32(10):1846–50.CrossRef
52.
Cetrano G, Salvador-Carulla L, Tedeschi F, Rabbi L, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Gonzalez-Caballero JL, et al. The balance of adult mental health care: provision of core health versus other types of care in eight European countries. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e6.CrossRef
53.
Mueller-Stierlin AS, Meixner F, Kohlmann A, Schumacher M, Hänsel A, Pouwels M, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community-based mental health care programme (GBV) for people with severe mental illness in Germany: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–14.CrossRef
54.
Davidsen AS, Davidsen J, Jønsson ABR, Nielsen MH, Kjellberg PK, Reventlow S. Experiences of barriers to trans-sectoral treatment of patients with severe mental illness. A qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):1–13.CrossRef
55.
Bjørkquist C, Hansen GV. Coordination of services for dual diagnosis clients in the interface between specialist and community care. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:233–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Ådnanes M, Steihaug S. “You never know what happens next” – young adult service users’ experience with mental health care and treatment through one year. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(3):5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Ådnanes M, Steihaug S. Obstacles to continuity of care in young mental health service users’ pathways-an explorative study. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e031.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Steihaug S, Johannessen A-K, Ådnanes M, Paulsen B, Mannion R. Challenges in achieving collaboration in clinical practice: the case of Norwegian health care. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(3):e031.CrossRef
59.
Vik E. Coordination between health care professions–a scoping review. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. 2018;21:119–47.CrossRef
60.
Ness O, Borg M, Semb R, Karlsson B. “Walking alongside:” collaborative practices in mental health and substance use care. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014;8(1):55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Wormdahl I, Husum TL, Rugkåsa J, Rise MB. Professionals’ perspectives on factors within primary mental health services that can affect pathways to involuntary psychiatric admissions. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Miles M, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Arizona State University: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2019.
63.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
64.
Powell R, Single H. Focus Groups. Int J Qual Health C. 1996;8(5):499–504.CrossRef
65.
Barbour R. Doing Focus Groups. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2018.CrossRef
66.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research. Introducing Focus Groups BMJ. 1995;311(7000):299–302.PubMed
67.
Landheim A, Odden S. Evaluation of Norwegian FACT teams. Hamar: Inland hospital Trust; 2020.
68.
Krueger R, Casey M, Donner J, Kirsch S, Maack J. Social analysis: selected tools and techniques, Paper Number 36. Washington: World Bank; 2001.
69.
Spohrer J, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Maglio PP, editors. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008); IEEE. 2008.
70.
Priest P, Dunn C, Hackett J, Wills K. How can mental health professionals best be supported in working with people who experience significant distress? J Ment Health. 2011;20(6):543–54.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Eriksson E, Andersson T, Hellström A, Gadolin C, Lifvergren S. Collaborative public management: coordinated value propositions among public service organizations. Public Manag Rev. 2019;22:1–22.
72.
Melby L, Brattheim BJ, Hellesø R. Patients in transition-–improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(23–24):3389–99.PubMedCrossRef
73.
O’Connor K, Neff DM, Pitman S. Burnout in mental health professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants. Eur Psychiatry. 2018;53:74–99.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Sim J, Waterfield J. Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Qual Quant. 2019;53(6):3003–22.CrossRef
76.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Flexible assertive community treatment teams can change complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of service providers
Authors
Kristin Trane
Kristian Aasbrenn
Martin Rønningen
Sigrun Odden
Annika Lexén
Anne Landheim
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00463-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

Developing a task-sharing psychological intervention to treat mild to moderate symptoms of perinatal depression and anxiety in South Africa: a mixed-method formative study

Research

Characterizing individuals accessing mental health services in the UAE: a focus on youth living in Dubai

Research

Mental health consequences of home demolition policy towered Palestinians: Literature review

Research

Barriers and drivers to service delivery in global mental health projects

Research

Factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Portugal

Research

Adherence to clinical guidelines in integration of mental health services into primary health care in Mbarara, southwestern Uganda: a medical records review