Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

How are patients with rare diseases and their carers in the UK impacted by the way care is coordinated? An exploratory qualitative interview study

Authors: Amy Simpson, Lara Bloom, Naomi J. Fulop, Emma Hudson, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Stephen Morris, Angus I. G. Ramsay, Alastair G. Sutcliffe, Holly Walton, Amy Hunter

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Care coordination is considered important for patients with rare conditions, yet research addressing the impact of care coordination is limited. This study aimed to explore how care coordination (or lack of) impacts on patients and carers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 patients and carers/parents in the UK, representing a range of rare conditions (including undiagnosed conditions). Transcripts were analysed thematically in an iterative process.

Results

Participants described a range of experiences and views in relation to care coordination. Reports of uncoordinated care emerged: appointments were uncoordinated, communication between key stakeholders was ineffective, patients and carers were required to coordinate their own care, and care was not coordinated to meet the changing needs of patients in different scenarios. As a result, participants experienced an additional burden and barriers/delays to accessing care. The impacts described by patients and carers, either attributed to or exacerbated by uncoordinated care, included: impact on physical health (including fatigue), financial impact (including loss of earnings and travel costs), and psychosocial impact (including disruption to school, work and emotional burden). Overall data highlight the importance of flexible care, which meets individual needs throughout patients’/carers’ journeys. Specifically, study participants suggested that the impacts may be addressed by: having support from a professional to coordinate care, changing the approach of clinics and appointments (where they take place, which professionals/services are available and how they are scheduled), and improving communication through the use of technology, care plans, accessible points of contact and multi-disciplinary team working.

Conclusion

This study provides further evidence of impacts of uncoordinated care; these may be complex and influenced by a number of factors. Approaches to coordination which improve access to care and lessen the time and burden placed on patients and carers may be particularly beneficial. Findings should influence future service developments (and the evaluation of such developments). This will be achieved, in the first instance, by informing the CONCORD Study in the UK.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
One participant had a child who had been diagnosed with the same condition as them – the participant is recorded as a patient (rather than parent) in the Table 1, although they were able to talk from both perspectives.
 
2
It is important to note that participants are likely to have interpreted ‘specialist centre’ differently as no definition was provided. Further detail was captured during the interviews and is described in the results section.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walton H, Hudson E, Simpson A, Ramsay AIG, Kai J, Morris S, Sutcliffe AG, Fulop NJ. Defining coordinated care for people with rare conditions: A scoping review. Int J Integr Care. 2020;2020(20):14.CrossRef Walton H, Hudson E, Simpson A, Ramsay AIG, Kai J, Morris S, Sutcliffe AG, Fulop NJ. Defining coordinated care for people with rare conditions: A scoping review. Int J Integr Care. 2020;2020(20):14.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft SA, McKinnon M, Paguntalan H, Owens DK. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination) Agency for Health-care Research and Quality, 2007. 0051; 04(07):0051-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44015/ McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft SA, McKinnon M, Paguntalan H, Owens DK. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination) Agency for Health-care Research and Quality, 2007. 0051; 04(07):0051-7. https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK44015/​
15.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How are patients with rare diseases and their carers in the UK impacted by the way care is coordinated? An exploratory qualitative interview study
Authors
Amy Simpson
Lara Bloom
Naomi J. Fulop
Emma Hudson
Kerry Leeson-Beevers
Stephen Morris
Angus I. G. Ramsay
Alastair G. Sutcliffe
Holly Walton
Amy Hunter
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01664-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2021 Go to the issue