Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Review

Review of 11 national policies for rare diseases in the context of key patient needs

Authors: Safiyya Dharssi, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Matthew Harold, Sharon Terry

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Rare diseases collectively exert a global public health burden in the severity of their manifestations and the total number of people they afflict. For many patients, considerable barriers exist in terms of access to appropriate care, delayed diagnosis and limited or non-existing treatment options. Motivated by these challenges, the rare disease patient community has played a critical role, elevating the patient voice and mobilizing legislation to support the development of programs that address the needs of patients with rare diseases.
The US Orphan Drug Act of 1983 served as a key milestone in this journey, providing a roadmap for other countries to introduce and implement similar orphan drug legislation; more recently, the European Union (EU) has gone further to encourage the widespread adoption and implementation of rare disease plans or strategies designed to more adequately address the comprehensive needs of patients with rare diseases. Despite these legislative efforts and the growing contributions of patient advocacy groups in moving forward implementation and adoption of rare disease programs, gaps still exist across the policy landscape for several countries. To gain deeper insights into the challenges and opportunities to address key needs of rare disease patients, it is critical to define the current status of rare disease legislation and policy across a geographically and economically diverse selection of countries. We analyzed the rare disease policy landscape across 11 countries: Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, Bulgaria, Turkey, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, China, and Taiwan. The status and implementation of policy was evaluated for each country in the context of key patient needs across 5 dimensions: improving coordination of care, diagnostic resources, access to treatments, patient awareness and support, and promoting innovative research. Our findings highlight the continuing role of the patient community in driving the establishment and adoption of legislation and programs to improve rare disease care. Further, we found that while national rare disease plans provide important guidance for improving care, implementation of plans is uneven across countries. More research is needed to demonstrate the effect of specific elements of rare disease plans on patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M. Two decades of orphan product development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(10):821–5.CrossRefPubMed Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M. Two decades of orphan product development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(10):821–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Orphan Drug Act, Public Law 97-414. 97th Congress. January 4, 1983 (US).2049-2066. Orphan Drug Act, Public Law 97-414. 97th Congress. January 4, 1983 (US).2049-2066.
4.
go back to reference Orphan Drug amendments of 1985, Public Law 99, 91, 15 August 1985 (US). Orphan Drug amendments of 1985, Public Law 99, 91, 15 August 1985 (US).
5.
go back to reference Orphan Drug amendments of 1988, Public Law 100-290, 18 April 1988 (US). Orphan Drug amendments of 1988, Public Law 100-290, 18 April 1988 (US).
8.
go back to reference Passos-Bueno MR, Bertola D, Horovitz DD, de Faria Ferraz VE, Brito LA. Genetics and genomics in Brazil: a promising future. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2(4):280–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Passos-Bueno MR, Bertola D, Horovitz DD, de Faria Ferraz VE, Brito LA. Genetics and genomics in Brazil: a promising future. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2(4):280–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 8 June 2009 on an action in the field of rare diseases (2009/C 151/02). Off J Eur Union. 2009;151:7-10. Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 8 June 2009 on an action in the field of rare diseases (2009/C 151/02). Off J Eur Union. 2009;151:7-10.
11.
go back to reference Schieppati A, Henter JI, Daina E, Aperia A. Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008;371(9629):2039–41.CrossRefPubMed Schieppati A, Henter JI, Daina E, Aperia A. Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008;371(9629):2039–41.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Angelis A, Tordrup D, Kanavos P. Socio-economic burden of rare diseases: a systematic review of cost of illness evidence. Health Policy. 2015;119(7):964–79.CrossRefPubMed Angelis A, Tordrup D, Kanavos P. Socio-economic burden of rare diseases: a systematic review of cost of illness evidence. Health Policy. 2015;119(7):964–79.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wastfelt M, Fadeel B, Henter JI. A journey of hope: lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs. J Intern Med. 2006;260(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed Wastfelt M, Fadeel B, Henter JI. A journey of hope: lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs. J Intern Med. 2006;260(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dunoyer M. Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(7):475–6.CrossRefPubMed Dunoyer M. Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(7):475–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Villa S, Compagni A, Reich MR. Orphan drug legislation: lessons for neglected tropical diseases. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2009;24(1):27–42.CrossRefPubMed Villa S, Compagni A, Reich MR. Orphan drug legislation: lessons for neglected tropical diseases. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2009;24(1):27–42.CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Evangelista T, Hedley V, Atalaia A, et al. The context for the thematic grouping of rare diseases to facilitate the establishment of European Reference Networks. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evangelista T, Hedley V, Atalaia A, et al. The context for the thematic grouping of rare diseases to facilitate the establishment of European Reference Networks. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Tseng M. The Progress of Policies on Rare Diseases in Taiwan. National Taipei University Taiwan Foundation for Rare Disorders. Tseng M. The Progress of Policies on Rare Diseases in Taiwan. National Taipei University Taiwan Foundation for Rare Disorders.
33.
go back to reference Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1968;65(4):281–393.PubMed Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1968;65(4):281–393.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Harms E, Olgemoller B. Neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(1-2):11–21. quiz 22.PubMedPubMedCentral Harms E, Olgemoller B. Neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(1-2):11–21. quiz 22.PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Tsai Y-W. Access to orphan drugs through a HTA framework: Rare Disease Legislation in Taiwan. 7th Asia Pacific Future Trends Forum; 2014; Malaysia. Tsai Y-W. Access to orphan drugs through a HTA framework: Rare Disease Legislation in Taiwan. 7th Asia Pacific Future Trends Forum; 2014; Malaysia.
45.
go back to reference Caetano PA. Expedited approval of orphan drugs in Latin America not yet a reality. 2011. Caetano PA. Expedited approval of orphan drugs in Latin America not yet a reality. 2011.
46.
go back to reference Upadhyaya S. Highly Specialised Technology Evaluations at NICE. UK: Chilean Ministry for Health; 2016. Upadhyaya S. Highly Specialised Technology Evaluations at NICE. UK: Chilean Ministry for Health; 2016.
51.
go back to reference Miteva-Katrandzhieva TIG, Stefanov R, Naumova E, Guergueltcheva V, Savov A. Overview of epidemiological rare diseases registries in Bulgaria. Rare Dis Orphan Drugs. 2016;3(1):11–5. Miteva-Katrandzhieva TIG, Stefanov R, Naumova E, Guergueltcheva V, Savov A. Overview of epidemiological rare diseases registries in Bulgaria. Rare Dis Orphan Drugs. 2016;3(1):11–5.
53.
go back to reference Wong-Rieger D. State of the art of rare disease activities around the world: overview of the non-European landscape. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:(Suppl: A2). Wong-Rieger D. State of the art of rare disease activities around the world: overview of the non-European landscape. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:(Suppl: A2).
57.
go back to reference Bouslouk M. G-BA benefit assessment of new orphan drugs in Germany: the first five years. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2016;4(5):453–5.CrossRef Bouslouk M. G-BA benefit assessment of new orphan drugs in Germany: the first five years. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2016;4(5):453–5.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Choquet R, Landais P. The French national registry for rare diseases: an integrated model from care to epidemiology and research. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1):O7.CrossRefPubMedCentral Choquet R, Landais P. The French national registry for rare diseases: an integrated model from care to epidemiology and research. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1):O7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
68.
go back to reference Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU. Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU. Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
go back to reference Feltmate K, Janiszewski PM, Gingerich S, Cloutier M. Delayed access to treatments for rare diseases: who’s to blame? Respirology. 2015;20(3):361–9.CrossRefPubMed Feltmate K, Janiszewski PM, Gingerich S, Cloutier M. Delayed access to treatments for rare diseases: who’s to blame? Respirology. 2015;20(3):361–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Review of 11 national policies for rare diseases in the context of key patient needs
Authors
Safiyya Dharssi
Durhane Wong-Rieger
Matthew Harold
Sharon Terry
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0618-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017 Go to the issue