Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation

Authors: Ian D. Graham, Anita Kothari, Chris McCutcheon, On behalf of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Project Leads

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health research is conducted with the expectation that it advances knowledge and eventually translates into improved health systems and population health. However, research findings are often caught in the know-do gap: they are not acted upon in a timely way or not applied at all. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is advanced as a way to increase the relevance, applicability and impact of research. With IKT, knowledge users work with researchers throughout the research process, starting with identification of the research question. Knowledge users represent those who would be able to use research results to inform their decisions (e.g. clinicians, managers, policy makers, patients/families and others). Stakeholders are increasingly interested in the idea that IKT generates greater and faster societal impact. Stakeholders are all those who are interested in the use of research results but may not necessarily use them for their own decision-making (e.g. governments, funders, researchers, health system managers and policy makers, patients and clinicians). Although IKT is broadly accepted, the actual research supporting it is limited and there is uncertainty about how best to conduct and support IKT. This paper presents a protocol for a programme of research testing the assumption that engaging the users of research in phases of its production leads to (a) greater appreciation of and capacity to use research; (b) the production of more relevant, useful and applicable research that results in greater impact; and (c) conditions under which it is more likely that research results will influence policy, managerial and clinical decision-making.

Methods

The research programme will adopt an interdisciplinary, international, cross-sector approach, using multiple and mixed methods to reflect the complex and social nature of research partnerships. We will use ongoing and future natural IKT experiments as multiple cases to study IKT in depth, and we will take advantage of the team’s existing relationships with provincial, national and international organizations. Case studies will be retrospective and prospective, and the 7-year grant period will enable longitudinal studies. The initiation of partnerships, funding processes, the research lifecycle and then outcomes/impacts post project will be studied in real time. These living laboratories will also allow testing of strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the IKT approach.

Discussion

This is the first interdisciplinary, systematic and programmatic research study on IKT. The research will provide scientific evidence on how to reliably and validly measure collaborative research partnerships and their impacts. The proposed research will build the science base for IKT, assess its relationship with research use and identify best practices and appropriate conditions for conducting IKT to achieve the greatest impact. It will also train and mentor the next generation of IKT researchers.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Maclean R. Some basics of integrated knowledge translation research. In: Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Pearson A, editors. Turning knowledge into action: practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research. Adelaide: Lippincott-JBI; 2014. Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Maclean R. Some basics of integrated knowledge translation research. In: Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Pearson A, editors. Turning knowledge into action: practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research. Adelaide: Lippincott-JBI; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Gibbons M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications; 1994. Gibbons M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications; 1994.
9.
go back to reference Macaulay AC, Ing A, Salsberg J, McGregor A, Saad-Haddad C, Rice J, et al. Community-based participatory research: lessons from sharing results with the community: Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Prog Community Heal Partnerships Res Educ Action. 2007;1:143–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2007.0010.CrossRef Macaulay AC, Ing A, Salsberg J, McGregor A, Saad-Haddad C, Rice J, et al. Community-based participatory research: lessons from sharing results with the community: Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Prog Community Heal Partnerships Res Educ Action. 2007;1:143–52. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1353/​cpr.​2007.​0010.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salsberg J. Integrated knowledge translation and participatory research. In: Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Pearson A, editors. Turning knowledge into action: practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research. Adelaide, SA: Lippincott-JBI; 2014. Salsberg J. Integrated knowledge translation and participatory research. In: Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Pearson A, editors. Turning knowledge into action: practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research. Adelaide, SA: Lippincott-JBI; 2014.
28.
go back to reference Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. “Seeing” the difference: the importance of visibility and action as a mark of “authenticity” in co-production comment on “collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges”. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2016;6:345–8. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136.CrossRef Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. “Seeing” the difference: the importance of visibility and action as a mark of “authenticity” in co-production comment on “collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges”. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2016;6:345–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​15171/​ijhpm.​2016.​136.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference McLean RK, Graham ID, Bosompra K, Choudhry Y, Coen SE, Macleod M, Manuel C, McCarthy R, Mota A, Peckham D, Tetroe JM, Tucker J. Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs. Implement Sci. 2012;7:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-57. McLean RK, Graham ID, Bosompra K, Choudhry Y, Coen SE, Macleod M, Manuel C, McCarthy R, Mota A, Peckham D, Tetroe JM, Tucker J. Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs. Implement Sci. 2012;7:57. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1748-5908-7-57.
50.
54.
go back to reference Graham ID. A proposed research translation strategy 2012–2015. Adelaide: South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; 2012. Graham ID. A proposed research translation strategy 2012–2015. Adelaide: South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; 2012.
56.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2013. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.
62.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Fifth. SAGE: Thousand Oaks. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Fifth. SAGE: Thousand Oaks.
64.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Second. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Second. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011.
66.
go back to reference Pettigrew A. Leading organisational change: Frameworks and findings from Warwick research 1985–2002. Report for the Office of Public Sector Reform. London: Cabinet Office; 2002. Pettigrew A. Leading organisational change: Frameworks and findings from Warwick research 1985–2002. Report for the Office of Public Sector Reform. London: Cabinet Office; 2002.
Metadata
Title
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation
Authors
Ian D. Graham
Anita Kothari
Chris McCutcheon
On behalf of the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Project Leads
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Implementation Science 1/2018 Go to the issue