Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Electromyographic | Research

Wrist speed feedback improves elbow compensation and reaching accuracy for myoelectric transradial prosthesis users in hybrid virtual reaching task

Authors: Eric J. Earley, Reva E. Johnson, Jonathon W. Sensinger, Levi J. Hargrove

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Myoelectric prostheses are a popular choice for restoring motor capability following the loss of a limb, but they do not provide direct feedback to the user about the movements of the device—in other words, kinesthesia. The outcomes of studies providing artificial sensory feedback are often influenced by the availability of incidental feedback. When subjects are blindfolded and disconnected from the prosthesis, artificial sensory feedback consistently improves control; however, when subjects wear a prosthesis and can see the task, benefits often deteriorate or become inconsistent. We theorize that providing artificial sensory feedback about prosthesis speed, which cannot be precisely estimated via vision, will improve the learning and control of a myoelectric prosthesis.

Methods

In this study, we test a joint-speed feedback system with six transradial amputee subjects to evaluate how it affects myoelectric control and adaptation behavior during a virtual reaching task.

Results

Our results showed that joint-speed feedback lowered reaching errors and compensatory movements during steady-state reaches. However, the same feedback provided no improvement when control was perturbed.

Conclusions

These outcomes suggest that the benefit of joint speed feedback may be dependent on the complexity of the myoelectric control and the context of the task.
Footnotes
1
A supplemental variant of Fig. 3, which displays endpoint and joint angle errors separately for each reaching target, is provided alongside all other data and materials on the Open Science Framework [39].
 
2
This can be seen most clearly in the supplemental variant of Fig. 3, available on the Open Science Framework [39].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cordella F, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:1–14.CrossRef Cordella F, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:1–14.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miall RC, et al. Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy. Exp Brain Res. 2018;236:2137–55.CrossRef Miall RC, et al. Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy. Exp Brain Res. 2018;236:2137–55.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Antfolk C, et al. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10:45–54.CrossRef Antfolk C, et al. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10:45–54.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stephens-Fripp B, Alici G, Mutlu R. A review of non-invasive sensory feedback methods for transradial prosthetic hands. IEEE Access. 2018;3536:1–1. Stephens-Fripp B, Alici G, Mutlu R. A review of non-invasive sensory feedback methods for transradial prosthetic hands. IEEE Access. 2018;3536:1–1.
5.
go back to reference Stanley AA, Kuchenbecker KJ. Evaluation of tactile feedback methods for wrist rotation guidance. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2012;5:240–51.CrossRef Stanley AA, Kuchenbecker KJ. Evaluation of tactile feedback methods for wrist rotation guidance. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2012;5:240–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Witteveen HJB, Droog EA, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:2219–26.CrossRef Witteveen HJB, Droog EA, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:2219–26.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cipriani C, Segil JL, Clemente F, Richard RF, Edin B. Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:3421–9.CrossRef Cipriani C, Segil JL, Clemente F, Richard RF, Edin B. Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:3421–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Krueger AR, Giannoni P, Shah V, Casadio M, Scheidt RA. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:1–23. Krueger AR, Giannoni P, Shah V, Casadio M, Scheidt RA. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:1–23.
9.
go back to reference Guémann M, et al. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19:1–12.CrossRef Guémann M, et al. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19:1–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tchimino J, Dideriksen JL, Dosen S. EMG feedback outperforms force feedback in the presence of prosthesis control disturbance. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1–13.CrossRef Tchimino J, Dideriksen JL, Dosen S. EMG feedback outperforms force feedback in the presence of prosthesis control disturbance. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1–13.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mirelman A, et al. Audio-biofeedback training for posture and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:35.CrossRef Mirelman A, et al. Audio-biofeedback training for posture and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:35.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shehata AW, Scheme EJ, Sensinger JW. Audible feedback improves internal model strength and performance of myoelectric prosthesis control. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8541.CrossRef Shehata AW, Scheme EJ, Sensinger JW. Audible feedback improves internal model strength and performance of myoelectric prosthesis control. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8541.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engels LF, Shehata AW, Scheme EJ, Sensinger JW, Cipriani C. When less is more—discrete tactile feedback dominates continuous audio biofeedback in the integrated percept while controlling a myoelectric prosthetic hand. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1–10.CrossRef Engels LF, Shehata AW, Scheme EJ, Sensinger JW, Cipriani C. When less is more—discrete tactile feedback dominates continuous audio biofeedback in the integrated percept while controlling a myoelectric prosthetic hand. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ortiz-Catalan M, Håkansson B, Brånemark R, Hakansson B, Branemark R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:257re6.CrossRef Ortiz-Catalan M, Håkansson B, Brånemark R, Hakansson B, Branemark R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:257re6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tan DW, et al. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:257ra138.CrossRef Tan DW, et al. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:257ra138.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference D’Anna E, et al. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaau8892.CrossRef D’Anna E, et al. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaau8892.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Markovic M, Schweisfurth MA, Engels LF, Farina D, Dosen S. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: Incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:1–11.CrossRef Markovic M, Schweisfurth MA, Engels LF, Farina D, Dosen S. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: Incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:1–11.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Marasco PD, et al. Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaao6990.CrossRef Marasco PD, et al. Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaao6990.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Markovic M, et al. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:28.CrossRef Markovic M, et al. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:28.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mastinu E, et al. Neural feedback strategies to improve grasping coordination in neuromusculoskeletal prostheses. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–15.CrossRef Mastinu E, et al. Neural feedback strategies to improve grasping coordination in neuromusculoskeletal prostheses. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cipriani C, Zaccone F, Micera S, Carrozza MC. On the shared control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand: analysis of user-prosthesis interaction. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24:170–84.CrossRef Cipriani C, Zaccone F, Micera S, Carrozza MC. On the shared control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand: analysis of user-prosthesis interaction. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24:170–84.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brown JD, et al. An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:1–17.CrossRef Brown JD, et al. An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:1–17.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Witteveen HJB, Rietman HS, Veltink PH. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39:204–12.CrossRef Witteveen HJB, Rietman HS, Veltink PH. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39:204–12.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Christie BP, et al. Visual inputs and postural manipulations affect the location of somatosensory percepts elicited by electrical stimulation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11699.CrossRef Christie BP, et al. Visual inputs and postural manipulations affect the location of somatosensory percepts elicited by electrical stimulation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11699.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002;415:429–33.CrossRef Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002;415:429–33.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between. Senses Science. 2002;298:1627–30. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between. Senses Science. 2002;298:1627–30.
27.
go back to reference Earley EJ, Johnson RE, Hargrove LJ, Sensinger JW. Joint speed discrimination and augmentation for prosthesis feedback. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17752.CrossRef Earley EJ, Johnson RE, Hargrove LJ, Sensinger JW. Joint speed discrimination and augmentation for prosthesis feedback. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17752.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Earley EJ, Johnson RE, Sensinger JW, Hargrove LJ. Joint speed feedback improves myoelectric prosthesis adaptation after perturbed reaches in non amputees. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5158.CrossRef Earley EJ, Johnson RE, Sensinger JW, Hargrove LJ. Joint speed feedback improves myoelectric prosthesis adaptation after perturbed reaches in non amputees. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5158.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Clites TR, et al. Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaap8373.CrossRef Clites TR, et al. Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaap8373.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pinzur MS. General principles of amputation surgery. In: Krajbich JI, Pinzur MS, Potter BK, Stevens PM, editors. Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018. Pinzur MS. General principles of amputation surgery. In: Krajbich JI, Pinzur MS, Potter BK, Stevens PM, editors. Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.
31.
go back to reference Schmidt RA, et al. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979;86:415.CrossRef Schmidt RA, et al. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979;86:415.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Blustein D, Shehata A, Englehart K, Sensinger J. Conventional analysis of trial-by-trial adaptation is biased: empirical and theoretical support using a Bayesian estimator. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14: e1006501.CrossRef Blustein D, Shehata A, Englehart K, Sensinger J. Conventional analysis of trial-by-trial adaptation is biased: empirical and theoretical support using a Bayesian estimator. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14: e1006501.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blustein DH, Shehata AW, Kuylenstierna ES, Englehart KB, Sensinger JW. An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–12.CrossRef Blustein DH, Shehata AW, Kuylenstierna ES, Englehart KB, Sensinger JW. An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–12.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Johnson RE, Kording KP, Hargrove LJ, Sensinger JW. Adaptation to random and systematic errors: comparison of amputee and non-amputee control interfaces with varying levels of process noise. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–19.CrossRef Johnson RE, Kording KP, Hargrove LJ, Sensinger JW. Adaptation to random and systematic errors: comparison of amputee and non-amputee control interfaces with varying levels of process noise. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–19.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis. 2008;8(20):1–19. Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis. 2008;8(20):1–19.
36.
go back to reference Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron. 2011;70:787–801.CrossRef Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron. 2011;70:787–801.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Canaveral CA, Danion F, Berrigan F, Bernier P-M. Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2017;118:2745–54.CrossRef Canaveral CA, Danion F, Berrigan F, Bernier P-M. Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2017;118:2745–54.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kutner MH. Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2005. Kutner MH. Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2005.
41.
go back to reference Dosen S, Markovic M, Somer K, Graimann B, Farina D. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:55.CrossRef Dosen S, Markovic M, Somer K, Graimann B, Farina D. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:55.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Schweisfurth MA, et al. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force. J Neural Eng. 2016;13:056010.CrossRef Schweisfurth MA, et al. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force. J Neural Eng. 2016;13:056010.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Williams HE, Chapman CS, Pilarski PM, Vette AH, Hebert JS. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18:1–15.CrossRef Williams HE, Chapman CS, Pilarski PM, Vette AH, Hebert JS. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18:1–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Wrist speed feedback improves elbow compensation and reaching accuracy for myoelectric transradial prosthesis users in hybrid virtual reaching task
Authors
Eric J. Earley
Reva E. Johnson
Jonathon W. Sensinger
Levi J. Hargrove
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01138-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2023 Go to the issue