Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis

Authors: Anns Issac, Susmita Chatterjee, Aradhana Srivastava, Sanghita Bhattacharyya

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To expand access to safe deliveries, some developing countries have initiated demand-side financing schemes promoting institutional delivery. In the context of conditional cash incentive scheme and free maternity care in public health facilities in India, studies have highlighted high out of pocket expenditure (OOPE) of Indian families for delivery and maternity care. In this context the study assesses the components of OOPE that women incurred while accessing maternity care in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. It also assesses the determinants of OOPE and the level of maternal satisfaction while accessing care from these facilities.

Method

It is a cross-sectional analysis of 558 recently delivered women who have delivered at four public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. All OOPE related information was collected through interviews using structured pre-tested questionnaires. Frequencies, Mann-Whitney test and categorical regression were used for data reduction.

Results

The analysis showed that the median OOPE was INR 700 (US$ 11.48) which varied between INR 680 (US$ 11.15) for normal delivery and INR 970 (US$ 15.9) for complicated cases. Tips for getting services (consisting of gifts and tips for services) with a median value of INR 320 (US$ 5.25) contributed to the major share in OOPE. Women from households with income more than INR 4000 (US$ 65.57) per month, general castes, primi-gravida, complicated delivery and those not accompanied by community health workers incurred higher OOPE. The significant predictors for high OOPE were caste (General Vs. OBC, SC/ST), type of delivery (Complicated Vs. Normal), and presence of ASHA (No Vs. Yes). OOPE while accessing care for delivery was one among the least satisfactory items and 76 % women expressed their dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

Even though services at the public health facilities in India are supposed to be provided free of cost, it is actually not free, and the women in this study paid almost half of their mandated cash incentives to obtain delivery care.
Footnotes
1
One US$ = 61 INR (during the time of field work -2014)
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990-2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990-2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
2.
go back to reference United Nations Children’s Fund. The State of the World’s Children, 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2008. United Nations Children’s Fund. The State of the World’s Children, 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2008.
3.
go back to reference Jehan K, Sidney K, Smith H, de Costa A. Improving access to maternity services: an overview of cash transfer and voucher schemes in South Asia. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):142–54.CrossRefPubMed Jehan K, Sidney K, Smith H, de Costa A. Improving access to maternity services: an overview of cash transfer and voucher schemes in South Asia. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):142–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference MacKeith N, Chinganya OJM, Ahmed Y, Murray SF. Zambian women's experiences of urban maternity care: results from a community survey in Lusaka. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7:92–102.CrossRefPubMed MacKeith N, Chinganya OJM, Ahmed Y, Murray SF. Zambian women's experiences of urban maternity care: results from a community survey in Lusaka. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7:92–102.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J. Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J. Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference George A. Quality of reproductive care in private hospitals in Andhra Pradesh: Women’s perception. Econ Political Wkly. 2002;37:1686–92. George A. Quality of reproductive care in private hospitals in Andhra Pradesh: Women’s perception. Econ Political Wkly. 2002;37:1686–92.
10.
go back to reference Ohagwu CC, Abu PO, Odo MC, Chiegwu HU. Maternal perception of barriers to utilization of prenatal ultrasound in prenatal care in the northern part of Nigeria. Clin Mother Child Health. 2010;7:1195–9.CrossRef Ohagwu CC, Abu PO, Odo MC, Chiegwu HU. Maternal perception of barriers to utilization of prenatal ultrasound in prenatal care in the northern part of Nigeria. Clin Mother Child Health. 2010;7:1195–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bazant ES, Koenig MA. Women’s satisfaction with delivery care in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21:79–86.CrossRefPubMed Bazant ES, Koenig MA. Women’s satisfaction with delivery care in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21:79–86.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Aniebue UU, Aniebue PN. Women’s perception as a barrier to focused antenatal care in Nigeria: the issue of fewer antenatal visits. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26:423–8.CrossRefPubMed Aniebue UU, Aniebue PN. Women’s perception as a barrier to focused antenatal care in Nigeria: the issue of fewer antenatal visits. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26:423–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Mohimen HAA, Abd-Rabou RA, Ali HA, Tosson MM. Evaluation of ANC services & women’s perception in Assiut University Hospital. Ass Univ Bull Environ Res. 2006;9:31–40. El-Mohimen HAA, Abd-Rabou RA, Ali HA, Tosson MM. Evaluation of ANC services & women’s perception in Assiut University Hospital. Ass Univ Bull Environ Res. 2006;9:31–40.
14.
go back to reference Registrar General of India. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2010-12. New Delhi: Government of India; 2013. Registrar General of India. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2010-12. New Delhi: Government of India; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Indian Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National family health survey (NFHS 3) 2005-06 - India, Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007. Indian Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National family health survey (NFHS 3) 2005-06 - India, Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.
20.
go back to reference United Nations children’s Fund (UNICEF). Coverage evaluation survey. National factsheet. New Delhi: UNICEF; 2009. United Nations children’s Fund (UNICEF). Coverage evaluation survey. National factsheet. New Delhi: UNICEF; 2009.
22.
go back to reference Coffey D. Costs and consequences of a cash transfer for hospital births in a rural district of Uttar Pradesh. India Soc Sci Med. 2014;114:89–96.CrossRefPubMed Coffey D. Costs and consequences of a cash transfer for hospital births in a rural district of Uttar Pradesh. India Soc Sci Med. 2014;114:89–96.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tripathi N, Saini SK, Prinja S. Impact of Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram on out-of-pocket expenditure among urban slum dwellers in Northern India. Indian Pediatrics. 2014;51:475–77.CrossRefPubMed Tripathi N, Saini SK, Prinja S. Impact of Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram on out-of-pocket expenditure among urban slum dwellers in Northern India. Indian Pediatrics. 2014;51:475–77.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bonu S, Bhushan I, Rani M, Anderson I. Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009;2(6):445–56.CrossRef Bonu S, Bhushan I, Rani M, Anderson I. Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009;2(6):445–56.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dilip TR. Utilization of inpatient care from private hospitals: trends emerging from Kerala India. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(5):437–46.CrossRefPubMed Dilip TR. Utilization of inpatient care from private hospitals: trends emerging from Kerala India. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(5):437–46.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Garg C, Karan A. Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(2):116–28.CrossRefPubMed Garg C, Karan A. Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(2):116–28.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mukherjee S, Singh A, Chandra R. Maternity or catastrophe: a study of household expenditure on maternal health care in India. Health. 2013;5(1):109–18.CrossRef Mukherjee S, Singh A, Chandra R. Maternity or catastrophe: a study of household expenditure on maternal health care in India. Health. 2013;5(1):109–18.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Modugu HR, Kumar M, Kumar A, Christopher M. State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for deliveries in India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Modugu HR, Kumar M, Kumar A, Christopher M. State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for deliveries in India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Registrar General of India. Sample registration system bulletin. New Delhi: Government of India. 2014;49:1. Registrar General of India. Sample registration system bulletin. New Delhi: Government of India. 2014;49:1.
30.
go back to reference Registrar General of India. Annual health survey (AHS) in 8 EAG states and Assam 2010-11. New Delhi: Government of India; 2012. Registrar General of India. Annual health survey (AHS) in 8 EAG states and Assam 2010-11. New Delhi: Government of India; 2012.
31.
go back to reference Gopalan SS, Durairaj V. Addressing maternal healthcare through demand side financial incentives: Experience of Janani Suraksha Yojana program in India. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gopalan SS, Durairaj V. Addressing maternal healthcare through demand side financial incentives: Experience of Janani Suraksha Yojana program in India. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Shrestha B, Paneru DP, Shrestha N, Dhimal B. Client’s satisfaction on maternity services at Paropakar maternity and women’s hospital, Kathmandu. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2010;1(1):56–9. Shrestha B, Paneru DP, Shrestha N, Dhimal B. Client’s satisfaction on maternity services at Paropakar maternity and women’s hospital, Kathmandu. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2010;1(1):56–9.
34.
go back to reference Dhar RSG, Nagpal J, Sinha S, Bhargava VL, Sachdeva A, Bhartia A. Direct cost of maternity-care services in South Delhi: a community survey. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:368–78.PubMedPubMedCentral Dhar RSG, Nagpal J, Sinha S, Bhargava VL, Sachdeva A, Bhartia A. Direct cost of maternity-care services in South Delhi: a community survey. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:368–78.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO). Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India – Health. Report No. NSS KI (71/25.0). New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation; 2015. National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO). Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India – Health. Report No. NSS KI (71/25.0). New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Borghi J, Sabina N, Blum LS, Hoque ME, Ronsmans C. Household costs of healthcare during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period: a case study from Matlab. Bangladesh J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:446–55.PubMed Borghi J, Sabina N, Blum LS, Hoque ME, Ronsmans C. Household costs of healthcare during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period: a case study from Matlab. Bangladesh J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:446–55.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Jeffery P, Das A, Dasgupta J, Jeffery R. Unmonitored intrapartum oxytocin use in home deliveries: evidence from Uttar Pradesh India. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):172–8.CrossRefPubMed Jeffery P, Das A, Dasgupta J, Jeffery R. Unmonitored intrapartum oxytocin use in home deliveries: evidence from Uttar Pradesh India. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):172–8.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Gupta SK, Pal DK, Tiwari R, Garg R, Sarawagi R, Shrivastava KA, Gupta P. Assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) – in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh: knowledge, attitude and utilization pattern of beneficiaries: a descriptive study. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;1(2):06–11. Gupta SK, Pal DK, Tiwari R, Garg R, Sarawagi R, Shrivastava KA, Gupta P. Assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) – in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh: knowledge, attitude and utilization pattern of beneficiaries: a descriptive study. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;1(2):06–11.
39.
go back to reference Balabanova D, McKee M. Understanding informal payments for health care: the example of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2002;62(3):243–73.CrossRefPubMed Balabanova D, McKee M. Understanding informal payments for health care: the example of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2002;62(3):243–73.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya S, Issac A, Rajbangshi P, Srivastava A, Avan BI. User’s perspective to improve quality in maternal health care: development of maternal satisfaction scale for secondary level of care. Report. New Delhi: Public Health Foundation of India; 2015. Bhattacharyya S, Issac A, Rajbangshi P, Srivastava A, Avan BI. User’s perspective to improve quality in maternal health care: development of maternal satisfaction scale for secondary level of care. Report. New Delhi: Public Health Foundation of India; 2015.
41.
go back to reference Emelumadu OF, Onyeonoro UU, Ukegbu AU, Ezeama NN, Ifeadike CO, Okezie OK. Perception of quality of maternal healthcare services among women utilizing antenatal services in selected primary health facilities in Anambra State, Southeast Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2014;55:148–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emelumadu OF, Onyeonoro UU, Ukegbu AU, Ezeama NN, Ifeadike CO, Okezie OK. Perception of quality of maternal healthcare services among women utilizing antenatal services in selected primary health facilities in Anambra State, Southeast Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2014;55:148–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Indian Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08. Mumbai: IIPS; 2010. Indian Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08. Mumbai: IIPS; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis
Authors
Anns Issac
Susmita Chatterjee
Aradhana Srivastava
Sanghita Bhattacharyya
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0221-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Reproductive Health 1/2015 Go to the issue