Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India

Authors: Hanimi Reddy Modugu, Manish Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Christopher Millett

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High out-of-pocket-expenditure (OOPE) deters families from seeking skilled/institutional care. ‘Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), a conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005 to mitigate OOPE and to promote institutional deliveries among the poor, is part of Government of India’s efforts to achieve Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5. The objective of this study is to estimate variations in OOPE for normal/caesarean-section deliveries, JSY-programme use and delivery associated borrowings - by states and union territories, and socio-demographic profiling of families, in India.

Methods

Secondary analysis of data from the District Level Household Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08. Mean and median OOPE, percentage use of JSY and percentage of families needing to borrow money to pay for delivery associated expenditure was estimated for institutional and home deliveries.

Results

Half (52%) of all deliveries in India occurred at home in 2007/08. OOPE for women having institutional deliveries remained high, with considerable variation between states and union territories. Mean OOPE (SD) of a normal delivery in public and private institution respectively in India were Rs. 1,624 and Rs. 4,458 and for a caesarean-section it was Rs. 5,935 and Rs. 14,276 respectively. There was considerable state-level variation in use of the JSY programme for normal deliveries (15% nationally; ranging from 0% in Goa to 43% in Madhya Pradesh) and the percentage of families having to borrow money to pay for a caesarean-section in a private institution (47% nationally; ranging from 7% in Goa to 69% in Bihar). Increased literacy and wealth were associated with a higher likelihood of an institutional delivery, higher OOPE but no major variations in use of the JSY.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the ongoing high OOPE and impoverishing impact of institutional care for deliveries in India. Supporting families in financial planning for maternity care, additional investment in the JSY programme and strengthening state level planning are required to increase the proportion of institutional deliveries.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kesterton AJ, et al: Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 30-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kesterton AJ, et al: Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 30-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Nalin T: Paying the price: Institutional delivery costs keep pregnant women at home. 2011, Available from: [http://governancenow.com/views/think-tanks/paying-price-institutional-delivery-costs-keep-pregnant-women-home] Nalin T: Paying the price: Institutional delivery costs keep pregnant women at home. 2011, Available from: [http://​governancenow.​com/​views/​think-tanks/​paying-price-institutional-delivery-costs-keep-pregnant-women-home]
3.
go back to reference National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Report of the National Commission on Microeconomics and Health: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2005, Government of India, New Delhi National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Report of the National Commission on Microeconomics and Health: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2005, Government of India, New Delhi
4.
go back to reference Borghi J, Storeng K, Filippi V: Overview of the costs of obstetric care and the economic and social consequences for households. Stud Health Serv Organ Policy. 2008, 24: 27-52. Borghi J, Storeng K, Filippi V: Overview of the costs of obstetric care and the economic and social consequences for households. Stud Health Serv Organ Policy. 2008, 24: 27-52.
6.
go back to reference Selvaraj S, Karan AK: Deepening health insecurity in India: evidence from national sample surveys since 1980s. Econ Pol Wkly. 2009, 44: 55-60. Selvaraj S, Karan AK: Deepening health insecurity in India: evidence from national sample surveys since 1980s. Econ Pol Wkly. 2009, 44: 55-60.
7.
go back to reference FHI: Skilled care during child birth - Policy Brief. 2002, Family Care International Inc, 588 Broadway, Suit 503, New York FHI: Skilled care during child birth - Policy Brief. 2002, Family Care International Inc, 588 Broadway, Suit 503, New York
8.
go back to reference Office of the Registrar General, G.o.I: Sample Registration System. Maternal Mortality in India 1997–2003, Trends, Causes and Risk Factors. 2008 Office of the Registrar General, G.o.I: Sample Registration System. Maternal Mortality in India 1997–2003, Trends, Causes and Risk Factors. 2008
9.
go back to reference Office of the Registrar General, G.o.I: Sample Registration System. Special bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India 2007–09. 2011 Office of the Registrar General, G.o.I: Sample Registration System. Special bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India 2007–09. 2011
10.
go back to reference IIPS: National family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992–93. 1995, International Institute for Population Sciences, Bombay IIPS: National family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992–93. 1995, International Institute for Population Sciences, Bombay
11.
go back to reference IIPS: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India. 2007, International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International, Mumbai, India IIPS: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India. 2007, International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International, Mumbai, India
12.
go back to reference UNICEF: Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES-2009). 2009, All India Report, New Delhi UNICEF: Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES-2009). 2009, All India Report, New Delhi
14.
go back to reference Lim SS, et al: India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9730): 2009-23.CrossRefPubMed Lim SS, et al: India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9730): 2009-23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Paul VK: India: conditional cash transfers for in-facility deliveries. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9730): 1943-4.CrossRefPubMed Paul VK: India: conditional cash transfers for in-facility deliveries. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9730): 1943-4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Annual report to the people on health. 2010, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi Annual report to the people on health. 2010, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi
17.
go back to reference Janani Suraksha Yojana: Guidelines for Implementation. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India Janani Suraksha Yojana: Guidelines for Implementation. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India
18.
go back to reference Vyas S, et al: A cost analysis of deliveries conducted in various health care settings in a city of India. Healthline. 2011, 1 (1): 61-64. Vyas S, et al: A cost analysis of deliveries conducted in various health care settings in a city of India. Healthline. 2011, 1 (1): 61-64.
19.
go back to reference Satapathy DM, Panda R, Das BC: Cost factors related with normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section in government and non-government settings. Indian J Community Medicine. 2005, 30 (2): 66-67. Satapathy DM, Panda R, Das BC: Cost factors related with normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section in government and non-government settings. Indian J Community Medicine. 2005, 30 (2): 66-67.
20.
go back to reference Rajeswari B, Dilip TR, Duggal R: Utilization of and expenditure on delivery care services: Some observations from Nasik district, Maharashtra. 2003, New Delhi, India: Regional health forum WHO South-East Asia region, 34-41. Rajeswari B, Dilip TR, Duggal R: Utilization of and expenditure on delivery care services: Some observations from Nasik district, Maharashtra. 2003, New Delhi, India: Regional health forum WHO South-East Asia region, 34-41.
21.
go back to reference Iyengar SD, et al: Comparison of domiciliary and institutional delivery-care practices in rural Rajasthan, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009, 27 (2): 303-12.PubMedPubMedCentral Iyengar SD, et al: Comparison of domiciliary and institutional delivery-care practices in rural Rajasthan, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009, 27 (2): 303-12.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Hotchkiss DR, Kanjilal B, Sharma S, Sodani PR, Chakraborty G: Household expenditure on reproductive and child health care services in Udaipur, Rajasthan. Financing reproductive and child health care in Rajasthan. 2000, New Delhi, India: The Futures Group International, POLICY Project; and the Indian Institute of Health Management Research Hotchkiss DR, Kanjilal B, Sharma S, Sodani PR, Chakraborty G: Household expenditure on reproductive and child health care services in Udaipur, Rajasthan. Financing reproductive and child health care in Rajasthan. 2000, New Delhi, India: The Futures Group International, POLICY Project; and the Indian Institute of Health Management Research
23.
go back to reference IIPS and G.o.I. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: District Level Household Survey (DLHS-3). Interviewer’s Manual. 2007–08, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai IIPS and G.o.I. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: District Level Household Survey (DLHS-3). Interviewer’s Manual. 2007–08, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai
25.
go back to reference Khan ME, Hazra A, Bhatnagar I: Impact of JSY on selected family health behaviors in rural Uttar Pradesh. J Fam Welf. 2010, 56: 9-22. Khan ME, Hazra A, Bhatnagar I: Impact of JSY on selected family health behaviors in rural Uttar Pradesh. J Fam Welf. 2010, 56: 9-22.
26.
go back to reference Programme evaluation of the Janani Suraksha Yojana. 2011, New Delhi: National Health System Resource Centre, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India Programme evaluation of the Janani Suraksha Yojana. 2011, New Delhi: National Health System Resource Centre, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India
27.
go back to reference Bonu S, Bhushan I, Rani M, Anderson I: Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009, 24 (6): 445-456.CrossRefPubMed Bonu S, Bhushan I, Rani M, Anderson I: Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009, 24 (6): 445-456.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Concurrent Assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme in selected states of India, 2008. 2009, New Delhi: UNFPA Concurrent Assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme in selected states of India, 2008. 2009, New Delhi: UNFPA
29.
go back to reference IIPS: District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08; India. 2010, Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences IIPS: District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08; India. 2010, Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences
30.
go back to reference Economic survey. 2011, New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India, -12: Statistical appendix Economic survey. 2011, New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India, -12: Statistical appendix
31.
go back to reference Ministry of Finance, G.o.I: Economic survey. 2011, New Delhi, –12: Statistical appendix Ministry of Finance, G.o.I: Economic survey. 2011, New Delhi, –12: Statistical appendix
Metadata
Title
State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India
Authors
Hanimi Reddy Modugu
Manish Kumar
Ashok Kumar
Christopher Millett
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1048

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Public Health 1/2012 Go to the issue