Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

A multiple case study of intersectoral public health networks: experiences and benefits of using research

Authors: Anita Kothari, Charmaine McPherson, Dana Gore, Benita Cohen, Marjorie MacDonald, Shannon L. Sibbald

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Network partnerships between public health and third sector organisations are being used to address the complexities of population level social determinants of health and health equity. An understanding of how these networks use research and knowledge is crucial to effective network design and outcome evaluation. There is, however, a gap in the literature regarding how public health networks use research and knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to report on the qualitative findings from a larger study that explored (1) the experiences of public health networks with using research and knowledge, and (2) the perceived benefits of using research and knowledge.

Methods

A multiple case study approach framed this study. Focus group data were collected from participants through a purposive sample of four public health networks. Data were analyzed using Framework Analysis and Nvivo™ software supported data management. Each network had the opportunity to participate in data interpretation.

Results

All networks used published research studies and other types of knowledge to accomplish their work, although in each network research and knowledge played different but complementary roles. Neither research nor other types of knowledge were privileged, and an approach that blended varied knowledge types was typically used. Network experiences with research and knowledge produced individual and collective benefits. A novel finding was that research and knowledge were both important in shaping network function.

Conclusions

This study shifts the focus in the current literature from public health departments to the community setting where public health collaborates with a broader spectrum of actors to ameliorate health inequities. Both formal research and informal knowledge were found to be important for collaborative public health networks. Examining the benefits of research and knowledge use within public health networks may help us to better understand the relationships among process (the collaborative use of research and knowledge), structure (networks) and outcomes (benefits).
Literature
5.
go back to reference Orme J, Pilkington P. Teaching public health networks in England: An innovative approach to building public health capacity and capability. Public Health. 2009;123(12):800–4.CrossRefPubMed Orme J, Pilkington P. Teaching public health networks in England: An innovative approach to building public health capacity and capability. Public Health. 2009;123(12):800–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kassler WJ, Goldsberry YP. The New Hampshire Public Health Network: creating local public health infrastructure through community-driven partnerships. J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2005;11(2):150–7.CrossRef Kassler WJ, Goldsberry YP. The New Hampshire Public Health Network: creating local public health infrastructure through community-driven partnerships. J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2005;11(2):150–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Murayama H, Yamaguchi T, Nagata S, Murashima S. The effects of an intervention program for promoting interorganizational network building between multidisciplinary agencies and community-based organizations: a cluster trial in Japan. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:178.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Murayama H, Yamaguchi T, Nagata S, Murashima S. The effects of an intervention program for promoting interorganizational network building between multidisciplinary agencies and community-based organizations: a cluster trial in Japan. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:178.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ovseiko PV, O’Sullivan C, Powell SC, Davies SM, Buchan AM. Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: evidence from the National Health Service in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:552.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ovseiko PV, O’Sullivan C, Powell SC, Davies SM, Buchan AM. Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: evidence from the National Health Service in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:552.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huerta T. Maintaining relationships is critical in network’s success. Healthc Pap. 2005;7(2):28–31. Huerta T. Maintaining relationships is critical in network’s success. Healthc Pap. 2005;7(2):28–31.
10.
go back to reference Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev. 2001;61(4):414–23.CrossRef Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev. 2001;61(4):414–23.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Santoro FM, Borges MRS, Rezende EA. Collaboration and knowledge sharing in network organizations. Expert Syst Appl. 2006;31(4):715–27.CrossRef Santoro FM, Borges MRS, Rezende EA. Collaboration and knowledge sharing in network organizations. Expert Syst Appl. 2006;31(4):715–27.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Huerta TR, Casebeer A, Vanderplaat M. Using networks to enhance health services delivery: perspectives, paradoxes and propositions. Healthc Pap. 2005;7(2):10–26.CrossRef Huerta TR, Casebeer A, Vanderplaat M. Using networks to enhance health services delivery: perspectives, paradoxes and propositions. Healthc Pap. 2005;7(2):10–26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wei-Skillern J. Networks as a type of social entrepreneurship to advance population health. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A120.PubMedCentralPubMed Wei-Skillern J. Networks as a type of social entrepreneurship to advance population health. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A120.PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Jonathan FE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201.CrossRefPubMed Brownson RC, Jonathan FE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kiefer L, John F, Di Ruggiero E, Dobbins M, Manuel D, Gully PR, et al. Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada: examining the need for a Canadian population and public health evidence centre and research network. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(3):I1–40 following 200. Kiefer L, John F, Di Ruggiero E, Dobbins M, Manuel D, Gully PR, et al. Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada: examining the need for a Canadian population and public health evidence centre and research network. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(3):I1–40 following 200.
16.
go back to reference Waters E, Doyle J. Evidence based public health practice: improving the quality and quantity of evidence. J Public Health Med. 2002;24(3):227–9.CrossRefPubMed Waters E, Doyle J. Evidence based public health practice: improving the quality and quantity of evidence. J Public Health Med. 2002;24(3):227–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hardwick R, Anderson R, Cooper C. How do third sector organisations use research and other knowledge? A systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hardwick R, Anderson R, Cooper C. How do third sector organisations use research and other knowledge? A systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, Kothari A. Public health decision-makers’ informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):156–63.CrossRef Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, Kothari A. Public health decision-makers’ informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):156–63.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
22.
go back to reference Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA. Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Progr Plan. 2011;32(1):1–12.CrossRef Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA. Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Progr Plan. 2011;32(1):1–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2423–31.PubMed Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2423–31.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Meagher-Stewart D, Solberg SM, MacDonald J-A, McPherson C, Seaman P. Understanding the role of communities of practice in evidence-informed decision making in public health. Health Policy Serv. 2012;22(6):723–39. Meagher-Stewart D, Solberg SM, MacDonald J-A, McPherson C, Seaman P. Understanding the role of communities of practice in evidence-informed decision making in public health. Health Policy Serv. 2012;22(6):723–39.
28.
go back to reference Higgins JW, Strange K, Scarr J, Pennock M, Barr V, Yew A, et al. “It’s a feel. That's what a lot of our evidence would consist of”: public health practitioners’ perspectives on evidence. Eval Health Prof. 2011;34(3):278–96.CrossRefPubMed Higgins JW, Strange K, Scarr J, Pennock M, Barr V, Yew A, et al. “It’s a feel. That's what a lot of our evidence would consist of”: public health practitioners’ perspectives on evidence. Eval Health Prof. 2011;34(3):278–96.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference De Jong T, Ferguson-Hessler MGM. Types and qualities of knowledge. Educ Psychol. 1996;31(2):105–13.CrossRef De Jong T, Ferguson-Hessler MGM. Types and qualities of knowledge. Educ Psychol. 1996;31(2):105–13.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Collins H. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010.CrossRef Collins H. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1013.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1013.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. J Manage. 2012;39(4):1115–66. Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. J Manage. 2012;39(4):1115–66.
34.
go back to reference Popay J, Mallinson S, Kowarzik U, Mackian S, Busby H, Elliot H. Developing public health work in local health systems. Prim Heal Care Res Dev. 2004;5:338–50.CrossRef Popay J, Mallinson S, Kowarzik U, Mackian S, Busby H, Elliot H. Developing public health work in local health systems. Prim Heal Care Res Dev. 2004;5:338–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A multiple case study of intersectoral public health networks: experiences and benefits of using research
Authors
Anita Kothari
Charmaine McPherson
Dana Gore
Benita Cohen
Marjorie MacDonald
Shannon L. Sibbald
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0082-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue