Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Systematic review

How do third sector organisations use research and other knowledge? A systematic scoping review

Authors: Rebecca Hardwick, Rob Anderson, Chris Cooper

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Third sector organisations (TSOs) are a well-established component of health care provision in the UK’s NHS and other health systems, but little is known about how they use research and other forms of knowledge in their work. There is an emerging body of evidence exploring these issues but there is no review of this literature. This scoping review summarises what is known about how health and social care TSOs use research and other forms of knowledge in their work.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases was carried out with initial exploratory searching of knowledge mobilisation websites, contacting authors, and hand searching of journals. The literature was narratively summarised to describe how TSOs use knowledge in decision making.

Results

Ten qualitative and mixed methods studies were retrieved. They show that TSOs wish to be “evidence-informed” in their decision making, and organisational context influences the kinds of research and knowledge they prefer, as well as how they use it. Barriers to research use include time, staff skill, resources and the acontextual nature of some academic research. Appropriate approaches to knowledge mobilisation may include using research intermediaries, involving TSOs in research, and better description of interventions and contexts in academic publications to aid applying it in the multi-disciplinary contexts of TSOs. TSOs identified specific benefits of using research, such as confidence that services were good quality, ability to negotiate with stakeholders and funders, and saving time and resources through implementing interventions shown to be effective. The small number of included studies means the findings need further confirmation through primary research.

Conclusions

As the contribution of health and social care TSOs to service delivery is growing, the need to understand how they mobilise research and other forms of knowledge will continue. The research community could 1) develop relationships with TSOs to support the design and development of research projects, 2) use a range of methods to evaluate interventions to facilitate TSOs applying them to their organisational contexts and 3) improve our understanding of how TSOs use knowledge, through the use of complementary research methods, such as a realist review or ethnography.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dacombe R, Bach S. The evidence base for third sector policy in Scotland: a review of selected recent literature. Queens Printers of Scotland: Edinburgh; 2009. Dacombe R, Bach S. The evidence base for third sector policy in Scotland: a review of selected recent literature. Queens Printers of Scotland: Edinburgh; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Dickinson H, Allen K, Alcock P, Macmillan R, Glasby J. The role of the third sector in delivering social care: scoping review. NIHR School for Social Care Research: Birmingham; 2012. Dickinson H, Allen K, Alcock P, Macmillan R, Glasby J. The role of the third sector in delivering social care: scoping review. NIHR School for Social Care Research: Birmingham; 2012.
3.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Guta A. Community-based organizations in the health sector: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Systems. 2012;10:36.CrossRef Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Guta A. Community-based organizations in the health sector: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Systems. 2012;10:36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Salaman L, Anheier H. Defining the non-profit sector: a cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1997. Salaman L, Anheier H. Defining the non-profit sector: a cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1997.
5.
go back to reference Alcock P. A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK. Voluntary Sector Review. 2010;1:5–24.CrossRef Alcock P. A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK. Voluntary Sector Review. 2010;1:5–24.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bartlett W, Allen P, Pérotin V, Turner S, Zamora B, Matchaya G, et al. Provider diversity in the NHS: Impact on quality and innovation. Final report to the NIHR Policy Research Programme. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2011. Bartlett W, Allen P, Pérotin V, Turner S, Zamora B, Matchaya G, et al. Provider diversity in the NHS: Impact on quality and innovation. Final report to the NIHR Policy Research Programme. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2011.
7.
go back to reference NCVO. UK Civil Society Almanac. London: NCVO; 2012. NCVO. UK Civil Society Almanac. London: NCVO; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Macmillan R. The third sector delivering public services: an evidence review. Working Paper 20. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre; 2010. Macmillan R. The third sector delivering public services: an evidence review. Working Paper 20. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre; 2010.
9.
go back to reference Holder H. Role of the voluntary sector in providing commissioning support: research report. London: Nuffield Trust; 2013. Holder H. Role of the voluntary sector in providing commissioning support: research report. London: Nuffield Trust; 2013.
10.
go back to reference Phipps DJ, Jensen KE, Myers JG. Applying Social Sciences Research for Public benefit using Knowledge Mobilization and Social Media. In: López-Varela A, editor. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Social Sciences and Knowledge Management. 2012. p. 179–208. InTECH. Phipps DJ, Jensen KE, Myers JG. Applying Social Sciences Research for Public benefit using Knowledge Mobilization and Social Media. In: López-Varela A, editor. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Social Sciences and Knowledge Management. 2012. p. 179–208. InTECH.
11.
go back to reference Nutley S, Walker I, Davies HTO. Using evidence. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007. Nutley S, Walker I, Davies HTO. Using evidence. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.
12.
go back to reference Kothari A, Armstrong R. Community-based knowledge translation: unexplored opportunities. Implement Science. 2011;6:59.CrossRef Kothari A, Armstrong R. Community-based knowledge translation: unexplored opportunities. Implement Science. 2011;6:59.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–4.CrossRefPubMed Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodology. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodology. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jack SM, Dobbins M, Sword W, Novotna G, Brooks S, Lipman EL, et al. Evidence-informed decision-making by professionals working in addiction agencies serving women: a descriptive qualitative study. Prevention and Policy: Substance Abuse Treatment; 2011. p. 6. Jack SM, Dobbins M, Sword W, Novotna G, Brooks S, Lipman EL, et al. Evidence-informed decision-making by professionals working in addiction agencies serving women: a descriptive qualitative study. Prevention and Policy: Substance Abuse Treatment; 2011. p. 6.
16.
go back to reference Ramanadhan S, Crisostomo J, Alexander-Molloy J, Gandelman E, Grullon M, Lora V, et al. Perceptions of evidence-based programs among community-based organizations tackling health disparities: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2012;27:717–28.CrossRefPubMed Ramanadhan S, Crisostomo J, Alexander-Molloy J, Gandelman E, Grullon M, Lora V, et al. Perceptions of evidence-based programs among community-based organizations tackling health disparities: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2012;27:717–28.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Travers R, Rourke SB. Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action. Implement science. 2010;5:33.CrossRef Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Travers R, Rourke SB. Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action. Implement science. 2010;5:33.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Rourke SB, Lavis JN, Bacon J, Travers R. Community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence: a survey of Ontario's HIV/AIDS sector. Implement Science. 2011;6:54.CrossRef Wilson MG, Rourke SB, Lavis JN, Bacon J, Travers R. Community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence: a survey of Ontario's HIV/AIDS sector. Implement Science. 2011;6:54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Grimshaw JM, Haynes RB, Bekele T, Rourke SB. Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement science. 2011;6:52.CrossRef Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Grimshaw JM, Haynes RB, Bekele T, Rourke SB. Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement science. 2011;6:52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference MacGregor JC, Kothari A, LeMoine K, Labelle J. Linking research to action for youth violence prevention: community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt and apply research evidence. Canadian journal of public health. 2013;104:e394–399.PubMed MacGregor JC, Kothari A, LeMoine K, Labelle J. Linking research to action for youth violence prevention: community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt and apply research evidence. Canadian journal of public health. 2013;104:e394–399.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wathen CN, Sibbald SL, Jack SM, Macmillan HL. Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women. Implement Science. 2011;6:102.CrossRef Wathen CN, Sibbald SL, Jack SM, Macmillan HL. Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women. Implement Science. 2011;6:102.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lightowler C. Improving Research use in the Third Sector: Learning from work with Apex Scotland (Project Report). In: Book Improving Research use in the Third Sector. Scotland: University of Glasgow and IRISS; 2012. Lightowler C. Improving Research use in the Third Sector: Learning from work with Apex Scotland (Project Report). In: Book Improving Research use in the Third Sector. Scotland: University of Glasgow and IRISS; 2012.
23.
go back to reference Bailey M, Warwick L. The third way for the third sector: using design to transfer knowledge and improve services in the voluntary sector. In: Howlett RJ, Gabrys B, Musial-Gabrys K, Roach J, editors. Innovation Through Knowledge Transfer. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 121–33. Bailey M, Warwick L. The third way for the third sector: using design to transfer knowledge and improve services in the voluntary sector. In: Howlett RJ, Gabrys B, Musial-Gabrys K, Roach J, editors. Innovation Through Knowledge Transfer. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 121–33.
24.
go back to reference Hardwick L, Coffey M. What can those who govern, manage and support voluntary sector organisations learn from a Merseyside Knowledge Exchange scheme? Voluntary Sector Review. 2011;2:399–407.CrossRef Hardwick L, Coffey M. What can those who govern, manage and support voluntary sector organisations learn from a Merseyside Knowledge Exchange scheme? Voluntary Sector Review. 2011;2:399–407.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shoultz J, Oneha MF, Magnussen L, Hla MM, Brees-Saunders Z, Cruz MD, et al. Finding solutions to challenges faced in community-based participatory research between academic and community organizations. J Interprof Care. 2006;20:133–44.CrossRefPubMed Shoultz J, Oneha MF, Magnussen L, Hla MM, Brees-Saunders Z, Cruz MD, et al. Finding solutions to challenges faced in community-based participatory research between academic and community organizations. J Interprof Care. 2006;20:133–44.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Washington WN. Collaborative/participatory research. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004;15:18–29.CrossRefPubMed Washington WN. Collaborative/participatory research. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004;15:18–29.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Krull I. Attitudes toward evidence-based pharmacological treatments among community-based addiction treatment programs targeting vulnerable patient groups. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2011;30(4):323–33.CrossRefPubMed Krull I. Attitudes toward evidence-based pharmacological treatments among community-based addiction treatment programs targeting vulnerable patient groups. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2011;30(4):323–33.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Shera W, Dill K. Promoting evidence-informed practice in child welfare in Ontario: progress, challenges and future directions. Res Social Work Practice. 2012;22:204–13.CrossRef Shera W, Dill K. Promoting evidence-informed practice in child welfare in Ontario: progress, challenges and future directions. Res Social Work Practice. 2012;22:204–13.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dolcini MM, Gandelman A, Vogan SA, Kong C, Leak T, King AJ, et al. Translating HIV interventions into practice: community-based organizations' experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs). Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1839–46.CrossRefPubMedCentral Dolcini MM, Gandelman A, Vogan SA, Kong C, Leak T, King AJ, et al. Translating HIV interventions into practice: community-based organizations' experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs). Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1839–46.CrossRefPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Lavis JN, Wilson MG. Community-based organisations and how to support their use of systematic reviews: a qualitative study. Evidence & Policy. 2011;7:449–69.CrossRef Lavis JN, Wilson MG. Community-based organisations and how to support their use of systematic reviews: a qualitative study. Evidence & Policy. 2011;7:449–69.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Owczarzak J. Evidence-based HIV, prevention in community settings: provider perspectives on evidence and effectiveness. Critical Public Health. 2012;22:73–84.CrossRef Owczarzak J. Evidence-based HIV, prevention in community settings: provider perspectives on evidence and effectiveness. Critical Public Health. 2012;22:73–84.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kimber M, Barwick M, Fearing G. Becoming an evidence-based service provider: staff perceptions and experiences of organizational change. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39:314–32.CrossRefPubMed Kimber M, Barwick M, Fearing G. Becoming an evidence-based service provider: staff perceptions and experiences of organizational change. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39:314–32.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference McLaughlin AM, Rothery M, Babins-Wagner R, Scheleifer B. Decision-making and evidence in direct practice. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2010;38:155–63.CrossRef McLaughlin AM, Rothery M, Babins-Wagner R, Scheleifer B. Decision-making and evidence in direct practice. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2010;38:155–63.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Beddoes D, Brodie E, Clarke R, Hoong SC. Benefits of open access to scholarly research for voluntary and charitable sector organisations. London: Office for Public Management; 2012. Beddoes D, Brodie E, Clarke R, Hoong SC. Benefits of open access to scholarly research for voluntary and charitable sector organisations. London: Office for Public Management; 2012.
35.
go back to reference Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2005. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2005.
36.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 Suppl 1:21–34.CrossRefPubMed Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 Suppl 1:21–34.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Davies HTO, Nutley SM. Learning more about how research-based knowledge gets used: guidance in the development of new empirical research. New York: William T. Grant Foundation; 2008. Davies HTO, Nutley SM. Learning more about how research-based knowledge gets used: guidance in the development of new empirical research. New York: William T. Grant Foundation; 2008.
38.
go back to reference Leslie M, Paradis E, Gropper MA, Reeves S, Kitto S. Applying ethnography to the study of context in healthcare quality and safety. BMJ quality & safety. 2014;23:99–105.CrossRef Leslie M, Paradis E, Gropper MA, Reeves S, Kitto S. Applying ethnography to the study of context in healthcare quality and safety. BMJ quality & safety. 2014;23:99–105.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Stevens A. Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. J Soc Policy. 2011;40:237–55.CrossRef Stevens A. Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. J Soc Policy. 2011;40:237–55.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Park MM, Zafran H, Stewart J, Salsberg J, Ells C, Rouleau S, et al. Transforming mental health services: a participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented services. Implementation science. 2014;9:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park MM, Zafran H, Stewart J, Salsberg J, Ells C, Rouleau S, et al. Transforming mental health services: a participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented services. Implementation science. 2014;9:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Salter KL, Kothari A. Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review. Implementation science. 2014;9:115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salter KL, Kothari A. Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review. Implementation science. 2014;9:115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
How do third sector organisations use research and other knowledge? A systematic scoping review
Authors
Rebecca Hardwick
Rob Anderson
Chris Cooper
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0265-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue