Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Rectal Cancer | Case Report

Streamlining robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection

Authors: Kazunosuke Yamada, Jun Imaizumi, Ryuji Kato, Takahiro Takada, Hitoshi Ojima

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted surgery has proven to be a safe and feasible approach for the management of rectal cancer, including abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, it often incurs longer operative times and higher costs. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by adopting a synchronous approach utilizing an optimized team composition.

Methods

Data on patients who underwent robot-assisted APR at our facility between June 2022 and June 2023 were analyzed. The key points of the optimized approach included the following: At the start of the surgery, the surgeon performed an anococcygeal ligament resection from the perineal side while the bedside assistants set up the ports. Then, through console manipulation, the presacral fascia, elevated by previously placed gauze, was easily and safely incised, providing access to the perineal region.

Results

A total of nine patients were included in this study. The median operation time was 231 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 170 ml. The operation time was reduced to 167.5 min, and the blood loss was 80.5 ml in cases without a trainee. Surgical site infections, classified as Clavien–Dindo grade II complications, were observed in two cases, but no obvious urinary or erectile dysfunction was observed.

Conclusion

The study results indicate that the challenges associated with APR can be efficiently addressed without requiring additional personnel by streamlining team composition and the synchronous approach. This optimization strategy minimizes the need for a larger surgical team, while maximizing the utilization of surgical time and resources.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hawkins AT, et al. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer in the twenty-first century: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(8):1477–87.CrossRefPubMed Hawkins AT, et al. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer in the twenty-first century: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(8):1477–87.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kasai S, et al. Advantages of robotic abdominoperineal resection compared with laparoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Surg Today. 2022;52(4):643–51.CrossRefPubMed Kasai S, et al. Advantages of robotic abdominoperineal resection compared with laparoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Surg Today. 2022;52(4):643–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Eftaiha SM, et al. Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):607–14.CrossRefPubMed Eftaiha SM, et al. Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):607–14.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yang Y, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727–36.CrossRefPubMed Yang Y, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727–36.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yamaguchi T, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today. 2016;46(8):957–62.CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi T, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today. 2016;46(8):957–62.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yamaguchi T, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(12):1755–62.CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi T, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(12):1755–62.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shiomi A, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(10):1701–10.CrossRefPubMed Shiomi A, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(10):1701–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hino H, et al. Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(11):879–86.CrossRefPubMed Hino H, et al. Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(11):879–86.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jayne D, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jayne D, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Albayati S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(2):637–43.CrossRefPubMed Albayati S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(2):637–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):816–30.CrossRefPubMed Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):816–30.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Silva-Velazco J, et al. Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes based on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;265(5):960–8.CrossRefPubMed Silva-Velazco J, et al. Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes based on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;265(5):960–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schmitz RL, et al. Synchronous (two-team) abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. AMA Arch Surg. 1958;77(4):492–7.CrossRefPubMed Schmitz RL, et al. Synchronous (two-team) abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. AMA Arch Surg. 1958;77(4):492–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shen K, Cui X, Xie Z. Double laparoscopy assisted cylindrical abdominal-perineal resection for low rectal cancer with 4 cases report. Med (Baltim). 2018;97(8):e9995.CrossRef Shen K, Cui X, Xie Z. Double laparoscopy assisted cylindrical abdominal-perineal resection for low rectal cancer with 4 cases report. Med (Baltim). 2018;97(8):e9995.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kinugasa Y, et al. Anatomical reevaluation of the anococcygeal ligament and its surgical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):232–7.CrossRefPubMed Kinugasa Y, et al. Anatomical reevaluation of the anococcygeal ligament and its surgical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):232–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kamali D, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes and patient quality of life between robotic and laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(8):607–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kamali D, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes and patient quality of life between robotic and laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(8):607–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Napoli N, et al. State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Update Surg. 2021;73(3):873–80.CrossRef Napoli N, et al. State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Update Surg. 2021;73(3):873–80.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kang B, et al. The effect of the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Front Surg. 2022;9:837545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang B, et al. The effect of the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Front Surg. 2022;9:837545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
go back to reference Yamada K, Kogure N, Ojima H. Learning curve for robotic bedside assistance for rectal cancer: application of the cumulative sum method. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(5):1027–35.CrossRefPubMed Yamada K, Kogure N, Ojima H. Learning curve for robotic bedside assistance for rectal cancer: application of the cumulative sum method. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(5):1027–35.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Izawa M, Okada Y. Current trends in health insurance systems: OECD countries vs. Japan Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(4):267–75.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki T, Izawa M, Okada Y. Current trends in health insurance systems: OECD countries vs. Japan Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(4):267–75.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Streamlining robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection
Authors
Kazunosuke Yamada
Jun Imaizumi
Ryuji Kato
Takahiro Takada
Hitoshi Ojima
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03260-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023 Go to the issue