Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Gastrectomy | Research

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in total gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Authors: Kozo Yoshikawa, Mitsuo Shimada, Takuya Tokunaga, Toshihiro Nakao, Masaaki Nishi, Chie Takasu, Hideya Kashihara, Yuma Wada, Toshiaki Yoshimoto

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol including early oral intake and omitting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement after total gastrectomy.

Methods

We analyzed 182 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy. The clinical pathway was changed in 2015, and patients were divided into 2 groups (conventional group and modified group). Postoperative complications, bowel movement, and postoperative hospital stays were compared in the two groups in all cases and propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Flatus and defecation were significantly earlier in the modified group compared with those in the conventional group (flatus: 2 (1–5) days vs 3 (2–12) days, p = 0.03; defecation: 4 (1–14) days vs 6 (2–12) days p = 0.04). The postoperative hospital stay was 18 (6–90) days in the conventional group and 14 (7–74) days in the modified group (p = 0.009). Days until discharge criteria were met were earlier in the modified group compared with that in the conventional group (10 (7–69) days vs 14 (6–84) days p = 0.01). Overall and severe complications occurred in nine patients (12.6%) and three patients (4.2%) in the conventional group and twelve patients (10.8%) and four patients (3.6%) in the modified group, respectively (p = 0.70 and p = 0.83) in all cases. In PSM, there is no significant difference between the two groups concerning the postoperative complications (overall complication 6 (12.5%) vs 8 (16.7%) p = 0.56, severe complications 1 (2%) vs 2 (4.2%) p = 0.83).

Conclusions

Modified ERAS for total gastrectomy may be feasible and safe.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nakagawa M, Tokunaga M, Aburatani T, Sato Y, Matsuyama T, Nakajima Y, et al. Feasibility and safety of early oral intake and discharge after total or proximal gastrectomy: an analysis of consecutive cases without exclusion criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:812–21.CrossRefPubMed Nakagawa M, Tokunaga M, Aburatani T, Sato Y, Matsuyama T, Nakajima Y, et al. Feasibility and safety of early oral intake and discharge after total or proximal gastrectomy: an analysis of consecutive cases without exclusion criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:812–21.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jeong O, Jang A, Jung M, Kang JH, Ryu SY. The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer: a large before-and-after propensity score matching study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:2162–8.CrossRefPubMed Jeong O, Jang A, Jung M, Kang JH, Ryu SY. The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer: a large before-and-after propensity score matching study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:2162–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Manabe N, Camilleri M, Rao A, Wong BS, Burton D, Busciglio I, et al. Effect of daikenchuto (TU-100) on gastrointestinal and colonic transit in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:970–5.CrossRef Manabe N, Camilleri M, Rao A, Wong BS, Burton D, Busciglio I, et al. Effect of daikenchuto (TU-100) on gastrointestinal and colonic transit in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:970–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wada Y, Nishiyama M, Uehara H, Sato K, Hamamoto Y, Ogihara H, et al. Microbiome biomarkers associated with the gut contraction response elicited by the Japanese traditional medicine Daikenchuto. Gene. 2022;826: 146262.CrossRefPubMed Wada Y, Nishiyama M, Uehara H, Sato K, Hamamoto Y, Ogihara H, et al. Microbiome biomarkers associated with the gut contraction response elicited by the Japanese traditional medicine Daikenchuto. Gene. 2022;826: 146262.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1-21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1-21.
7.
go back to reference Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.
8.
go back to reference Yoshikawa K, Shimada M, Higashijima J, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Takasu C, et al. Usefulness of the transoral anvil delivery system for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a single-institution comparative study of transoral anvil delivery system and the overlap method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:40–3.CrossRef Yoshikawa K, Shimada M, Higashijima J, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Takasu C, et al. Usefulness of the transoral anvil delivery system for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a single-institution comparative study of transoral anvil delivery system and the overlap method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:40–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yoshikawa K, Shimada M, Higashijima J, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Takasu C, et al. Transoral anvil delivery system with tension-free method for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy prevents the postoperative stenosis. Am Surg. 2020;13:3134820973393. Yoshikawa K, Shimada M, Higashijima J, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Takasu C, et al. Transoral anvil delivery system with tension-free method for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy prevents the postoperative stenosis. Am Surg. 2020;13:3134820973393.
10.
go back to reference Shimizu N, Oki E, Tanizawa Y, Suzuki Y, Aikou S, Kunisaki C, et al. Effect of early oral feeding on length of hospital stay following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a Japanese multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Surg Today. 2018;48:865–74.CrossRefPubMed Shimizu N, Oki E, Tanizawa Y, Suzuki Y, Aikou S, Kunisaki C, et al. Effect of early oral feeding on length of hospital stay following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a Japanese multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Surg Today. 2018;48:865–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Makuuchi R, Sugisawa N, Kaji S, Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer and an assessment of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:210–7.CrossRefPubMed Makuuchi R, Sugisawa N, Kaji S, Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer and an assessment of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:210–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Karran A, Wheat J, Chan D, Blaken P, Barlow R, Lewis WG. Propensity score analysis of an enhanced recovery programme in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:1645–54.CrossRefPubMed Karran A, Wheat J, Chan D, Blaken P, Barlow R, Lewis WG. Propensity score analysis of an enhanced recovery programme in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:1645–54.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tanaka R, Lee SW, Kawai M, Tashiro K, Kawashima S, Kagota S, et al. Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:861–71.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka R, Lee SW, Kawai M, Tashiro K, Kawashima S, Kagota S, et al. Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:861–71.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Weindelmayer J, Mengardo V, Gasparini A, Sacco M, Torroni L, Carlini M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery can improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital cost of gastrectomy for cancer in the west: a propensity-score-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:7087–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weindelmayer J, Mengardo V, Gasparini A, Sacco M, Torroni L, Carlini M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery can improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital cost of gastrectomy for cancer in the west: a propensity-score-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:7087–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Abdikarim I, Cao XY, Li SZ, Zhao YQ, Taupyk Y, Wang Q. Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(21):13339–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abdikarim I, Cao XY, Li SZ, Zhao YQ, Taupyk Y, Wang Q. Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(21):13339–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Rossetti G, Fei L, Docimo L, Del Genio G, Micanti F, Belfiore A, et al. Is nasogastric decompression useful in prevention of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A randomized trial. J Invest Surg. 2014;27:234–9.CrossRefPubMed Rossetti G, Fei L, Docimo L, Del Genio G, Micanti F, Belfiore A, et al. Is nasogastric decompression useful in prevention of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A randomized trial. J Invest Surg. 2014;27:234–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wang Q, Wu Z, Shi J, Hou S, Shan F, Li S, et al. Omitting nasogastric tube placement after gastrectomy does not enhance postoperative recovery: a propensity score matched analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407:113–22.CrossRefPubMed Wang Q, Wu Z, Shi J, Hou S, Shan F, Li S, et al. Omitting nasogastric tube placement after gastrectomy does not enhance postoperative recovery: a propensity score matched analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407:113–22.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:34–41.CrossRefPubMed Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:34–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wee IJY, Syn NLX, Shabbir A, Kim G, So JBY. Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:423–34.CrossRefPubMed Wee IJY, Syn NLX, Shabbir A, Kim G, So JBY. Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:423–34.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tian YL, Cao SG, Liu XD, Li ZQ, Liu G, Zhang XQ, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol vs conventional management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;7(26):5646–60.CrossRef Tian YL, Cao SG, Liu XD, Li ZQ, Liu G, Zhang XQ, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol vs conventional management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;7(26):5646–60.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Li Z, Wang Q, Li B, Bai B, Zhao Q. Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;23(15):207.CrossRef Li Z, Wang Q, Li B, Bai B, Zhao Q. Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;23(15):207.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Romario UF, Ascari F, De Pascale S; GIRCG. Implementation of the ERAS program in gastric surgery: a nationwide survey in Italy. Updates Surg. 2023;75:141–148. Romario UF, Ascari F, De Pascale S; GIRCG. Implementation of the ERAS program in gastric surgery: a nationwide survey in Italy. Updates Surg. 2023;75:141–148.
23.
go back to reference Garcia-Nebreda M, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Ripollés-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Alvaro Cifuentes E, Abad-Gurumeta A, et al. Early return to intended oncologic therapy after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for gastric cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407:2293–300.CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Nebreda M, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Ripollés-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Alvaro Cifuentes E, Abad-Gurumeta A, et al. Early return to intended oncologic therapy after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for gastric cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407:2293–300.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in total gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis
Authors
Kozo Yoshikawa
Mitsuo Shimada
Takuya Tokunaga
Toshihiro Nakao
Masaaki Nishi
Chie Takasu
Hideya Kashihara
Yuma Wada
Toshiaki Yoshimoto
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03034-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2023 Go to the issue