Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users?

Authors: Natasha C. Campling, David G. Pitts, Paul V. Knight, Richard Aspinall

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are many telehealthcare devices currently available ranging from personal alarms, automated pill dispensers and fall detectors through to monitoring devices for blood sugar, blood pressure and heart rate. Many devices remain unused once acquired or shortly after a period of initial use.

Methods

The study used a qualitative design involving focus groups and interviews. End users’ opinions of telehealthcare devices were examined through focus groups along with the views of market experts and key supply chain players through telephone interviews to ascertain their views on the devices. The data were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

Amongst the wide range of user issues associated with telehealthcare devices two themes merited particular attention: design characteristics and the lack of focus on end-user needs. Our findings suggested that few telehealthcare devices appear to be developed based on the principles of user-centred design. Consequently, many were non-intuitive to use, with the majority of the focus group participants not recognising the purpose of the devices from their appearance alone.

Conclusions

Greater input from real end-users rather than “proxy” users such as carers, professional users or technologists is required when developing telehealthcare devices or systems. Design should be focussed on intuitive use to enable the user to successfully achieve what is required from the devices. This may require the existing supplier—driven market focus to be challenged, but could improve the contribution of technology to improving healthcare.
Footnotes
1
A mouldable glue that turns to rubber
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference He W, Goodkind DA, Kowal P. In: Reports IP, editor. An aging world:2015; 2016. He W, Goodkind DA, Kowal P. In: Reports IP, editor. An aging world:2015; 2016.
4.
go back to reference Collerton J, Davies K, Jagger C, Kingston A, Bond J, Eccles MP, et al. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Collerton J, Davies K, Jagger C, Kingston A, Bond J, Eccles MP, et al. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference DALLAS Collaboration. Self Care in the Digital age - new horizons for self care. A white paper. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board; 2014. DALLAS Collaboration. Self Care in the Digital age - new horizons for self care. A white paper. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Telehealth and telecare, vol. 456. London: Houses of Parliament; 2014. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Telehealth and telecare, vol. 456. London: Houses of Parliament; 2014.
9.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):25.
10.
go back to reference Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis 12(4): 436-445. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):9. Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis 12(4): 436-445. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):9.
12.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Proctor R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Proctor R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Taylor A, Agamanolis S. Service users’ views of a mainstream telecare product - the personal trigger. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI April 10-15 2010; Atlanta, USA; 2010. Taylor A, Agamanolis S. Service users’ views of a mainstream telecare product - the personal trigger. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI April 10-15 2010; Atlanta, USA; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:15.CrossRef Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:15.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference de Leonidas V, Bartosova R, Lewis E. ALT market in the UK. In: AKTIVE consortium, editor. AKTIVE Market Report: Initial Overview. Manchester: Inventya Ltd; 2013. de Leonidas V, Bartosova R, Lewis E. ALT market in the UK. In: AKTIVE consortium, editor. AKTIVE Market Report: Initial Overview. Manchester: Inventya Ltd; 2013.
16.
go back to reference Lehoux P, Saint-Arnaud J, Richard L. The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. Sociol Health Illness. 2004;26(5):617–44.CrossRef Lehoux P, Saint-Arnaud J, Richard L. The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. Sociol Health Illness. 2004;26(5):617–44.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Buckle P. Human factors that influence the performance of the Telecare systems. In: AKTIVE Consortium, editor. AKTIVE working paper 7. Leeds: University of Leeds; 2014. Buckle P. Human factors that influence the performance of the Telecare systems. In: AKTIVE Consortium, editor. AKTIVE working paper 7. Leeds: University of Leeds; 2014.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (i) are they meeting the needs of end-users?
Authors
Natasha C. Campling
David G. Pitts
Paul V. Knight
Richard Aspinall
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2408-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue