Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

A multicriteria decision making approach applied to improving maintenance policies in healthcare organizations

Authors: María Carmen Carnero, Andrés Gómez

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Healthcare organizations have far greater maintenance needs for their medical equipment than other organization, as many are used directly with patients. However, the literature on asset management in healthcare organizations is very limited. The aim of this research is to provide more rational application of maintenance policies, leading to an increase in quality of care.

Methods

This article describes a multicriteria decision-making approach which integrates Markov chains with the multicriteria Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH), to facilitate the best choice of combination of maintenance policies by using the judgements of a multi-disciplinary decision group. The proposed approach takes into account the level of acceptance that a given alternative would have among professionals. It also takes into account criteria related to cost, quality of care and impact of care cover.

Results

This multicriteria approach is applied to four dialysis subsystems: patients infected with hepatitis C, infected with hepatitis B, acute and chronic; in all cases, the maintenance strategy obtained consists of applying corrective and preventive maintenance plus two reserve machines.

Conclusions

The added value in decision-making practices from this research comes from: (i) integrating the use of Markov chains to obtain the alternatives to be assessed by a multicriteria methodology; (ii) proposing the use of MACBETH to make rational decisions on asset management in healthcare organizations; (iii) applying the multicriteria approach to select a set or combination of maintenance policies in four dialysis subsystems of a health care organization. In the multicriteria decision making approach proposed, economic criteria have been used, related to the quality of care which is desired for patients (availability), and the acceptance that each alternative would have considering the maintenance and healthcare resources which exist in the organization, with the inclusion of a decision-making group. This approach is better suited to actual health care organization practice and depending on the subsystem analysed, improvements are introduced that are not included in normal maintenance policies; in this way, not only have different maintenance policies been suggested, but also alternatives that, in each case and according to viability, provide a more complete decision tool for the maintenance manager.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cutler DM. The lifetime costs and benefits of medical technology. J Health Econ. 2007;26:1081–100.CrossRefPubMed Cutler DM. The lifetime costs and benefits of medical technology. J Health Econ. 2007;26:1081–100.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wild C, Langer T. Emerging health technologies: informing and supporting health policy early. Health Policy. 2008;87:160–71.CrossRefPubMed Wild C, Langer T. Emerging health technologies: informing and supporting health policy early. Health Policy. 2008;87:160–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ciarapica FE, Giacchetta G, Paciarotti C. Facility management in the healthcare sector: analysis of the Italian situation. Production Planning & Control. 2008; doi:10.1080/09537280802034083. Ciarapica FE, Giacchetta G, Paciarotti C. Facility management in the healthcare sector: analysis of the Italian situation. Production Planning & Control. 2008; doi:10.​1080/​0953728080203408​3.
4.
go back to reference Gómez A, Carnero MC. Selection of a computerised maintenance management system: a case study in a regional health service. Prod Plan Control. 2011;22(4):426–36.CrossRef Gómez A, Carnero MC. Selection of a computerised maintenance management system: a case study in a regional health service. Prod Plan Control. 2011;22(4):426–36.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gómez A. Metodología para la optimización de la gestión y del mantenimiento de activos en un centro sanitario. PhD diss. Ciudad Real: University of Castilla-La Mancha; 2013. Gómez A. Metodología para la optimización de la gestión y del mantenimiento de activos en un centro sanitario. PhD diss. Ciudad Real: University of Castilla-La Mancha; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Liljegren E. Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36:345–52.CrossRef Liljegren E. Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36:345–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guelbenzu FJ, Dueñas PL. Organization of maintenance in health care organizations (in spanish). Madrid: Instituto Nacional de la Salud; 1990. Guelbenzu FJ, Dueñas PL. Organization of maintenance in health care organizations (in spanish). Madrid: Instituto Nacional de la Salud; 1990.
8.
go back to reference Cruz AM, Haugan GL, Rincon AMR. The effects of asset specificity on maintenance financial performance: an empirical application of transaction cost theory to the medical device maintenance field. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;237(3):1037–53.CrossRef Cruz AM, Haugan GL, Rincon AMR. The effects of asset specificity on maintenance financial performance: an empirical application of transaction cost theory to the medical device maintenance field. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;237(3):1037–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Al-Zubaidi H, Christer AH. Maintenance manpower modelling for a hospital building complex. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;99:603–18.CrossRef Al-Zubaidi H, Christer AH. Maintenance manpower modelling for a hospital building complex. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;99:603–18.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bashiri M, Badri H, Hejazi TH. Electing optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method. Appl Math Model. 2011;35(1):152–64.CrossRef Bashiri M, Badri H, Hejazi TH. Electing optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method. Appl Math Model. 2011;35(1):152–64.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Almeida AT, Bohoris AT. Decision theory in maintenance decision making. J Qual Maint Eng. 1995;1(1):39–45.CrossRef Almeida AT, Bohoris AT. Decision theory in maintenance decision making. J Qual Maint Eng. 1995;1(1):39–45.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martorell S, Sánchez A, Muñoz A, Pitarch JL, Serradell V, Roldan J. The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1999;65(2):85–94.CrossRef Martorell S, Sánchez A, Muñoz A, Pitarch JL, Serradell V, Roldan J. The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1999;65(2):85–94.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Martin JL, Ragozzino A, Vanzanella C, Scognamiglio A, Mirarchi L, Morgan SP. User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). a case study on a computed tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:2. Pecchia L, Martin JL, Ragozzino A, Vanzanella C, Scognamiglio A, Mirarchi L, Morgan SP. User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). a case study on a computed tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:2.
15.
go back to reference Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2000;70:71–83.CrossRef Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2000;70:71–83.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M. A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91:839–48.CrossRef Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M. A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91:839–48.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhaoyang T, Jianfeng L, Zongzhi W, Weifeng ZJH. An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci. 2011;49:852–60.CrossRef Zhaoyang T, Jianfeng L, Zongzhi W, Weifeng ZJH. An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci. 2011;49:852–60.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Al-Najjar B, Alsyouf I. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. Int J Prod Econ. 2003;84:85–100.CrossRef Al-Najjar B, Alsyouf I. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. Int J Prod Econ. 2003;84:85–100.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Emblemsvag J, Tonning L. Decision support in selecting maintenance organization. J Qual Maint Eng. 2003;9(1):11–24.CrossRef Emblemsvag J, Tonning L. Decision support in selecting maintenance organization. J Qual Maint Eng. 2003;9(1):11–24.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Labib AW. A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. J Qual Maint Eng. 2004;10(3):191–202.CrossRef Labib AW. A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. J Qual Maint Eng. 2004;10(3):191–202.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chan FTS, Prakash A. Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(23):7044–56.CrossRef Chan FTS, Prakash A. Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(23):7044–56.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ishizaka A, Nemery P. Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT. Omega. 2014;47:45–59.CrossRef Ishizaka A, Nemery P. Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT. Omega. 2014;47:45–59.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gómez de León FC, Ruiz JJ. Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91(4):444–51.CrossRef Gómez de León FC, Ruiz JJ. Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91(4):444–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carnero MC. An evaluation system of setting up of predictive maintenance programs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91(8):945–63.CrossRef Carnero MC. An evaluation system of setting up of predictive maintenance programs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2006;91(8):945–63.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wang L, Chu J, Wu J. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 2007;107:151–63.CrossRef Wang L, Chu J, Wu J. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 2007;107:151–63.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maint Eng. 2008;14(4):375–86.CrossRef Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maint Eng. 2008;14(4):375–86.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2009;20(7):1009–22.CrossRef Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2009;20(7):1009–22.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ahmadi A, Gupta S, Karim R, Kumar U. Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng. 2010;17(3):223–43.CrossRef Ahmadi A, Gupta S, Karim R, Kumar U. Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng. 2010;17(3):223–43.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Arunraj NS, Maiti J. Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Saf Sci. 2010;48:238–47.CrossRef Arunraj NS, Maiti J. Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Saf Sci. 2010;48:238–47.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ghosh D, Roy S. A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. Eur J Ind Eng. 2010;4(1):78–98.CrossRef Ghosh D, Roy S. A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. Eur J Ind Eng. 2010;4(1):78–98.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Aslam-Zainudeen N, Labib A. Practical application of the decision making grid (DMG). J Qual Maint Eng. 2011;17(2):138–49.CrossRef Aslam-Zainudeen N, Labib A. Practical application of the decision making grid (DMG). J Qual Maint Eng. 2011;17(2):138–49.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zaim S, Turkyílmaz A, Acar MF, Al-Turki U, Demirel OF. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng. 2012;18(1):16–29.CrossRef Zaim S, Turkyílmaz A, Acar MF, Al-Turki U, Demirel OF. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng. 2012;18(1):16–29.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Shahin A, Pourjavad E, Shirouyehzad H. Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by analytic network process with a case study in the mining industry. Inter J Product Qual Manag. 2012;10(4):464–83.CrossRef Shahin A, Pourjavad E, Shirouyehzad H. Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by analytic network process with a case study in the mining industry. Inter J Product Qual Manag. 2012;10(4):464–83.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 2012;16(1):85–104.CrossRef Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 2012;16(1):85–104.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sadeghi A, Manesh RA. The application of fuzzy group analytic network process to selection of best maintenance strategy - a case study in mobarakeh steel company, Iran. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;62:1378–83.CrossRef Sadeghi A, Manesh RA. The application of fuzzy group analytic network process to selection of best maintenance strategy - a case study in mobarakeh steel company, Iran. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;62:1378–83.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Cavalcante CA, Lopes VRS. Multi-criteria model to support the definition of opportunistic maintenance policy: a study in a cogeneration system. Energy. 2015;80:32–40.CrossRef Cavalcante CA, Lopes VRS. Multi-criteria model to support the definition of opportunistic maintenance policy: a study in a cogeneration system. Energy. 2015;80:32–40.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Taghipour S, Banjevic D, Jardine AKS. Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62:1666–87.CrossRef Taghipour S, Banjevic D, Jardine AKS. Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62:1666–87.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Costa CA B e, Vansnick JC. Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 1997;6:107–14.CrossRef Costa CA B e, Vansnick JC. Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 1997;6:107–14.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. MACBETH. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2012;11(2):359–87.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. MACBETH. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2012;11(2):359–87.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Nunes da Silva F, Vansnick JC. Conflict dissolution in the public sector: a case-study. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130:388–401.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Nunes da Silva F, Vansnick JC. Conflict dissolution in the public sector: a case-study. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130:388–401.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Carvalho R. Assigning priorities for maintenance, repair and refurbishment in managing a municipal housing stock. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;138:380–91.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Carvalho R. Assigning priorities for maintenance, repair and refurbishment in managing a municipal housing stock. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;138:380–91.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Correa E, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio-technical approach. Omega. 2002;30:227–42.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Correa E, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio-technical approach. Omega. 2002;30:227–42.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. On the mathematical foundations of MACBETH. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M, editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 409–42.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. On the mathematical foundations of MACBETH. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M, editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 409–42.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Roubens M, Rusinowska A, de Swart H. Using MACBETH to determine utilities of governments to parties in coalition formation. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;172(2):588–603.CrossRef Roubens M, Rusinowska A, de Swart H. Using MACBETH to determine utilities of governments to parties in coalition formation. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;172(2):588–603.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Montignac F, Noirot I, Chaudourne S. Multi-criteria evaluation of on-board hydrogen storage technologies using the MACBETH approach. Int JHydrog Energy. 2009;34(10):4561–8.CrossRef Montignac F, Noirot I, Chaudourne S. Multi-criteria evaluation of on-board hydrogen storage technologies using the MACBETH approach. Int JHydrog Energy. 2009;34(10):4561–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Oliveira MD. A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation. Omega. 2012;40(4):424–36.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Oliveira MD. A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation. Omega. 2012;40(4):424–36.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Carnero MC, Duarte M. A multi-criteria model for auditing a predictive maintenance programme. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;217:381–93.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Carnero MC, Duarte M. A multi-criteria model for auditing a predictive maintenance programme. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;217:381–93.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Rodrigues TC. The MACBETH approach to health value measurement: building a population health index in group processes. Procedia Technol. 2014;16:1361–6.CrossRef Rodrigues TC. The MACBETH approach to health value measurement: building a population health index in group processes. Procedia Technol. 2014;16:1361–6.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Gurmankin AD, Baron J, Armstrong K. The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Med Decis Making. 2004;24(3):265–71.CrossRefPubMed Gurmankin AD, Baron J, Armstrong K. The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Med Decis Making. 2004;24(3):265–71.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. MACBETH (measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique). In: Cochran JJ, Cox Jr LA, Keskinocak P, Kharoufeh JP, Smith JC, editors. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science. New York: Wiley; 2011. Bana e Costa CA, De Corte JM, Vansnick JC. MACBETH (measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique). In: Cochran JJ, Cox Jr LA, Keskinocak P, Kharoufeh JP, Smith JC, editors. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science. New York: Wiley; 2011.
51.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Chagas MP. A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;153:323–331. Bana e Costa CA, Chagas MP. A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;153:323–331.
52.
go back to reference Bana e Costa CA, Ensslin L, Correa EC, Vansnick JC. Decision support system in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;113:315–35.CrossRef Bana e Costa CA, Ensslin L, Correa EC, Vansnick JC. Decision support system in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;113:315–35.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference CEI IEC 61165:2006. Application of Markov techniques, international electrotechnical commission. Switzerland: IEC; 2006. CEI IEC 61165:2006. Application of Markov techniques, international electrotechnical commission. Switzerland: IEC; 2006.
54.
go back to reference Raz T, Ladany SP. Optimal policy for imperfect inspection in discrete time. Prod Plan Control. 1992;3(1):48–56.CrossRef Raz T, Ladany SP. Optimal policy for imperfect inspection in discrete time. Prod Plan Control. 1992;3(1):48–56.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Fleming KN. Markov models for evaluating risk-informedin-service inspection strategies for nuclear power plant piping systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2004;83:27–45.CrossRef Fleming KN. Markov models for evaluating risk-informedin-service inspection strategies for nuclear power plant piping systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2004;83:27–45.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Raje DV, Olaniya RS, Wakhare PD, Deshpande AW. Availability assessment of a two-unit stand-by pumping system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2000;68:269–74.CrossRef Raje DV, Olaniya RS, Wakhare PD, Deshpande AW. Availability assessment of a two-unit stand-by pumping system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2000;68:269–74.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Cochran JK, Murugan A, Krishnamurthy V. Generic Markov models for availability estimation and failure characterization in petroleum refineries. Comput Oper Res. 2001;28:1–12.CrossRef Cochran JK, Murugan A, Krishnamurthy V. Generic Markov models for availability estimation and failure characterization in petroleum refineries. Comput Oper Res. 2001;28:1–12.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Picciolo G, Galli F, Biamonti A, Magni P. Determining the maximum periodic inspection interval for medium voltage motors using a Markov model. Production Planning & Control. 2008; doi: 10.1080/09537280802034224 Picciolo G, Galli F, Biamonti A, Magni P. Determining the maximum periodic inspection interval for medium voltage motors using a Markov model. Production Planning & Control. 2008; doi: 10.​1080/​0953728080203422​4
59.
go back to reference Hillier F, Lieberman G. Introduction to operations research. New York: McGraw-Hill Science; 2002. Hillier F, Lieberman G. Introduction to operations research. New York: McGraw-Hill Science; 2002.
60.
go back to reference Taha HA. Investigación de operaciones. México: Prentice-Hall; 2004. Taha HA. Investigación de operaciones. México: Prentice-Hall; 2004.
61.
62.
go back to reference Creus A. Fiabilidad y seguridad. 2nd ed. Barcelona: MARCOMBO S.A.; 2005. Creus A. Fiabilidad y seguridad. 2nd ed. Barcelona: MARCOMBO S.A.; 2005.
63.
go back to reference Wortley S, Tong A, Lancsar E, Salkeld G, Howard K. Public preferences for engagement in health technology assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wortley S, Tong A, Lancsar E, Salkeld G, Howard K. Public preferences for engagement in health technology assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
go back to reference Swanson L. Linking maintenance strategies to performance. Int J Prod Econ. 2001;70(3):237–44.CrossRef Swanson L. Linking maintenance strategies to performance. Int J Prod Econ. 2001;70(3):237–44.CrossRef
65.
66.
go back to reference Kelly A. Strategic maintenance planning. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006. Kelly A. Strategic maintenance planning. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.
Metadata
Title
A multicriteria decision making approach applied to improving maintenance policies in healthcare organizations
Authors
María Carmen Carnero
Andrés Gómez
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0282-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2016 Go to the issue