Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Scoliosis | Research

Parents can reliably and accurately detect trunk asymmetry using an inclinometer smartphone app

Authors: Marie Beauséjour, Delphine Aubin, Carole Fortin, Mohamed N’dongo Sangaré, Mathilde Carignan, Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry, Carolina Martinez, Nathalie Bourassa, Nathalie Jourdain, Philippe Labelle, Hubert Labelle

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

An inclinometer smartphone application has been developed to enable the measurement of the angle of trunk inclination (ATI) to detect trunk surface asymmetry. The objective was to determine the reliability and validity of the smartphone app in the hands of non-professionals.

Methods

Three non-professional observers and one expert surgeon measured maximum ATI twice in a study involving 69 patients seen in the spine clinics to rule out scoliosis or for regular follow-up (10-18 y.o., Cobb [0°-58°]). Observers were parents not familiar with scoliosis screening nor use of an inclinometer. They received training from a 4-minute video. Intra and inter-observer reliability was determined using the generalizability theory and validity was assessed from intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), agreement with the expert on ATI measurements using Bland-Altman analysis, and correct identification of the threshold for consultation (set to ≥6° ATI).

Results

Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability coefficients were excellent ϕ = 0.92. The standard error of measurement was 1.5° (intra-observer, 2 measurements) meaning that a parent may detect a change of 4° between examinations 95% of the time. Comparison of measurements between non-professionals and the expert resulted in ICC varying from 0.82 [0.71-0.88] to 0.84 [0.74-0.90] and agreement on the decision to consult occurred in 83 to 90% of cases.

Conclusion

The use of a smartphone app resulted in excellent reliability, sufficiently low standard error of measurement (SEM) and good validity in the hands of non-professionals. The device and the instructional video are adequate means to allow detection and regular examination of trunk asymmetries by non-professionals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, et al. Scoliosis Imaging: What Radiologists Should Know (vol 30, pg 1823, 2010). Radiographics. 2015;35(4). Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, et al. Scoliosis Imaging: What Radiologists Should Know (vol 30, pg 1823, 2010). Radiographics. 2015;35(4).
2.
go back to reference Driscoll M, Fortier-Tougas C, Labelle H, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM. Evaluation of an apparatus to be combined with a smartphone for the early detection of spinal deformities. Scoliosis. 2014;9:10.CrossRef Driscoll M, Fortier-Tougas C, Labelle H, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM. Evaluation of an apparatus to be combined with a smartphone for the early detection of spinal deformities. Scoliosis. 2014;9:10.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Linker B. A dangerous curve: the role of history in america's scoliosis screening programs. Am J Public Health. 2012;120(4):606–16.CrossRef Linker B. A dangerous curve: the role of history in america's scoliosis screening programs. Am J Public Health. 2012;120(4):606–16.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morais T, Bernier M, Turcotte F. Age- and sex-specific prevalence of scoliosis and the value of school screening programs. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(12):1377–80.CrossRef Morais T, Bernier M, Turcotte F. Age- and sex-specific prevalence of scoliosis and the value of school screening programs. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(12):1377–80.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beausejour M, Roy-Beaudry M, Goulet L, Labelle H. Patient characteristics at the initial visit to a scoliosis clinic - A cross-sectional study in a community without school screening. Spine. 2007;32(12):1349–54.CrossRef Beausejour M, Roy-Beaudry M, Goulet L, Labelle H. Patient characteristics at the initial visit to a scoliosis clinic - A cross-sectional study in a community without school screening. Spine. 2007;32(12):1349–54.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Warren M, Leaver J, Alvik A. School screening for scoliosis. Lancet. 1981;2:522.CrossRef Warren M, Leaver J, Alvik A. School screening for scoliosis. Lancet. 1981;2:522.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Robitaille Y, Villavicencio-Pereda C, Gurr J. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: epidemiology and treatment outcome in a large cohort of children six years after screening. Int J Epidemiol. 1984;13(3):319–23.CrossRef Robitaille Y, Villavicencio-Pereda C, Gurr J. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: epidemiology and treatment outcome in a large cohort of children six years after screening. Int J Epidemiol. 1984;13(3):319–23.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193–254. The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193–254.
9.
go back to reference Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Ehrmann Feldman D, et al. Pathways of healthcare utilisation in patients with suspected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:500.CrossRef Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Ehrmann Feldman D, et al. Pathways of healthcare utilisation in patients with suspected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:500.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Roy-Beaudry M, Grimard G, Labelle H. Association between lay perception of morbidity and appropriateness of specialized health care use in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(3):727–36.CrossRef Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Roy-Beaudry M, Grimard G, Labelle H. Association between lay perception of morbidity and appropriateness of specialized health care use in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(3):727–36.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thomas JS, Stans AA, Milbrandt TA, et al. Does School Screening Affect Scoliosis Curve Magnitude at Presentation to a Pediatric Orthopedic Clinic? Spinal Deform. 2018;6(4):403–8.CrossRef Thomas JS, Stans AA, Milbrandt TA, et al. Does School Screening Affect Scoliosis Curve Magnitude at Presentation to a Pediatric Orthopedic Clinic? Spinal Deform. 2018;6(4):403–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis. 2013;8:17.CrossRef Labelle H, Richards SB, De Kleuver M, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis. 2013;8:17.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wilson JM, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. In: Geneva, ed. Vol 34. Public Health Papers1968. Wilson JM, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. In: Geneva, ed. Vol 34. Public Health Papers1968.
14.
go back to reference Bunnell WP. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66A(9):1381–7.CrossRef Bunnell WP. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66A(9):1381–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1512–21.CrossRef Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1512–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(2):165–72.CrossRef Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(2):165–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM, et al. Referral criteria for school scoliosis screening: assessment and recommendations based on a large longitudinally followed cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):E1492–8.CrossRef Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM, et al. Referral criteria for school scoliosis screening: assessment and recommendations based on a large longitudinally followed cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):E1492–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cote P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test. Spine. 1998;23(7):796–802.CrossRef Cote P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test. Spine. 1998;23(7):796–802.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Murrell GAC, Coonrad RW, Moorman CT, Fitch RD. An assessment of the reliability of the scoliometer. Spine. 1993;18(6):709–12.CrossRef Murrell GAC, Coonrad RW, Moorman CT, Fitch RD. An assessment of the reliability of the scoliometer. Spine. 1993;18(6):709–12.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(2):179–84.CrossRef Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(2):179–84.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Qiao J, Xu LL, Zhu ZZ, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:343.CrossRef Qiao J, Xu LL, Zhu ZZ, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:343.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Izatt MT, Bateman GR, Adam CJ. Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):14.CrossRef Izatt MT, Bateman GR, Adam CJ. Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):14.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Franko OI, Bray C, Newton PO. Validation of a Scoliometer Smartphone App to Assess Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):E72–5.CrossRef Franko OI, Bray C, Newton PO. Validation of a Scoliometer Smartphone App to Assess Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):E72–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Prowse A, Pope R, Gerdhem P, Abbott A. Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(2):450–66.CrossRef Prowse A, Pope R, Gerdhem P, Abbott A. Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(2):450–66.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Gravel D, Gauthier F, Labelle H. Reliability of a quantitative clinical posture assessment tool among persons with idiopathic scoliosis. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(1):64–75.CrossRef Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Gravel D, Gauthier F, Labelle H. Reliability of a quantitative clinical posture assessment tool among persons with idiopathic scoliosis. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(1):64–75.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shavelson R, Webb N. Generalizability theory: a primer. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1991. Shavelson R, Webb N. Generalizability theory: a primer. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1991.
27.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):85–93.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):85–93.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(8):931–6.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(8):931–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Manual for GENOVA: a generalized analysis of variance system [computer program]. Version 2.1. Iowa City: Research and development division, the American College Testing Program; 1983. Manual for GENOVA: a generalized analysis of variance system [computer program]. Version 2.1. Iowa City: Research and development division, the American College Testing Program; 1983.
31.
go back to reference Balg F, Juteau M, Theoret C, Svotelis A, Grenier G. Validity and Reliability of the iPhone to Measure Rib Hump in Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):774–9.CrossRef Balg F, Juteau M, Theoret C, Svotelis A, Grenier G. Validity and Reliability of the iPhone to Measure Rib Hump in Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):774–9.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Parent S, et al. The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation. Scoliosis. 2013;8(1):12.CrossRef Beauséjour M, Goulet L, Parent S, et al. The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation. Scoliosis. 2013;8(1):12.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Martinez CJ, Beauséjour M, Labelle H. From Systematic Screening Programs to Increased Community Awareness: Past, Present and Future of Scoliosis Detection in Children. J East Town Stud. 2021;49(49-61):117–9. Martinez CJ, Beauséjour M, Labelle H. From Systematic Screening Programs to Increased Community Awareness: Past, Present and Future of Scoliosis Detection in Children. J East Town Stud. 2021;49(49-61):117–9.
34.
go back to reference Dobrow MJ, Hagens V, Chafe R, Sullivan T, Rabeneck L. Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process. CMAJ. 2018;190(14):E422–e429.CrossRef Dobrow MJ, Hagens V, Chafe R, Sullivan T, Rabeneck L. Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process. CMAJ. 2018;190(14):E422–e429.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Parents can reliably and accurately detect trunk asymmetry using an inclinometer smartphone app
Authors
Marie Beauséjour
Delphine Aubin
Carole Fortin
Mohamed N’dongo Sangaré
Mathilde Carignan
Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry
Carolina Martinez
Nathalie Bourassa
Nathalie Jourdain
Philippe Labelle
Hubert Labelle
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05611-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue