Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Colorectal Cancer | Research

Colorectal cancer screening completion by patients due or overdue for screening after reminders: a retrospective study

Authors: Abdillahi M. Ahmed, Michael W. Bacchus, Stacy G. Beal, Katherine N. Huber, Ji-Hyun Lee, Jing Zhao, Thomas J. George, Maryam Sattari

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient and clinician reminders were implemented as part of an adherence improvement project at University of Florida (UF) Internal Medicine Clinics. We sought to assess colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates among patients not up-to-date with screening following distribution of reminders and to identify characteristics correlated with screening outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed for patients not up-to-date with CRC screening for whom at least one reminder (patient and/or clinician) was issued in June 2018. The primary endpoint, the completion of a CRC screening test, is characterized as the ratio of completed screening tests to the number of patients not up-to-date with screening. All analyses were performed using R 4.0 software.

Results

Of the 926 patients included, 403 (44%; 95% CI, 0.40–0.47) completed a CRC screening test within 24 months following a reminder. Family history of CRC (relative risk (RR) 1.33; P = 0.007), flu immunization within two years of the reminder (RR 1.23; P = 0.019), and receiving a patient reminder either alone (RR 1.62; P < 0.001) or in combination with a clinician reminder (RR 1.55; P = 0.006) were positively associated with CRC screening completion. Reporting being divorced, separated, or widowed was negatively associated with screening completion (RR 0.70; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

Reminders, in particular patient reminders, seem to be an effective method to enhance screening among patients not up-to-date with CRC screening. This study suggests that reminder efforts should be focused at the level of the patients and provides insight on target populations for practical interventions to further increase CRC screening adherence.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics. 2002;12(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics. 2002;12(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bénard F, Barkun AN, Martel M, von Renteln D. Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(1):124–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bénard F, Barkun AN, Martel M, von Renteln D. Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(1):124–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77.CrossRef US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, et al. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut. 2015;64(7):1158–77.CrossRefPubMed Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, et al. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut. 2015;64(7):1158–77.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rat C, Latour C, Rousseau R, et al. Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018;27(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed Rat C, Latour C, Rousseau R, et al. Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018;27(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Community preventive services task force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):97–118.CrossRefPubMed Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Community preventive services task force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):97–118.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rat C, Pogu C, Le Donné D, et al. Effect of physician notification regarding nonadherence to colorectal cancer screening on patient participation in fecal immunochemical test cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(9):816–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rat C, Pogu C, Le Donné D, et al. Effect of physician notification regarding nonadherence to colorectal cancer screening on patient participation in fecal immunochemical test cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(9):816–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R, et al. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):364–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R, et al. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):364–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, et al. Evaluation of interventions intended to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1645-58. 13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, et al. Evaluation of interventions intended to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1645-58. 13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–59.CrossRefPubMed Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–59.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference El-Haddad B, Dong F, Kallail KJ, et al. Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA. Color Dis. 2015;17:O108–14.CrossRef El-Haddad B, Dong F, Kallail KJ, et al. Association of marital status and colorectal cancer screening participation in the USA. Color Dis. 2015;17:O108–14.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meyler D, Stimpson JP, Peek MK. Health concordance within couples: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:2297–310.CrossRefPubMed Meyler D, Stimpson JP, Peek MK. Health concordance within couples: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:2297–310.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Puleo E, Vickers-Lahti M, et al. Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed Zapka JG, Puleo E, Vickers-Lahti M, et al. Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Guerra CE, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, et al. Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1681–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guerra CE, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, et al. Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1681–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641–51.CrossRefPubMed Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641–51.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colorectal cancer screening completion by patients due or overdue for screening after reminders: a retrospective study
Authors
Abdillahi M. Ahmed
Michael W. Bacchus
Stacy G. Beal
Katherine N. Huber
Ji-Hyun Lee
Jing Zhao
Thomas J. George
Maryam Sattari
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10837-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine