Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Perineal Laceration | Research

Perineal stress as a predictor of performing episiotomy in primiparous women: a prospective observational study

Authors: Binbin Xu, Qi Luo, Rongrong Wu, Ying Lu, Hongjun Ying, Yanan Xu, Zhaie Lu

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Episiotomy is a surgical solution to relieve perineal stress, resulting in an easily repairable incision, in comparison to the risks of serious vaginal trauma during delivery. The midwife typically adopts such a clinical decision, on experience and subjective judgment. However, the association between perineal stress and episiotomy is poorly characterized. Our aim was to identify a threshold value for perineal stress leading to episiotomy, which eventually may be employed as a clinical tool for assessing whether an episiotomy is required or not.

Methods

In total, 245 nulliparous women were investigated for perineal stress during non-instrumental vaginal delivery in Ningbo Women & Children’s Hospital. During the second stage of labor, a flexible membrane stress sensor was placed between the fetal head and perineal wall above the anal fissure. Once the entire fetal head pressed against the sensor, real-time perineal stress was measured, and the peak value was recorded. Cases were divided into non-episiotomy group (n = 173) and episiotomy group (n = 72). The correlations between perineal stress and episiotomy was assessed through logistic regression with adjustment for maternal age, estimated birthweight, duration of second stage of labor, maternal body mass index, and presence of analgesia. Midwives were blinded to all stress measurement values. The predictive value of perineal stress on performing episiotomy was evaluated, together with the ideal cut-off perineal stress value for performing episiotomy. A ROC analysis was also performed.

Results

The episiotomy group had significantly higher levels of perineal stress in comparison to the non-episiotomy group (140.50 ± 16.03 N versus 118.37 ± 19.21 N, p < 0.01). The episiotomy group was linked to significantly higher perineal stress in comparison to the non-episiotomy group (140.50 ± 16.03 VS 118.37 ± 19.21 N, p < 0.01). ROC analysis between perineal stress and episiotomy revealed a high area under the curve (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.75–0.86) and a cut-off value for perineal stress of 124.49 N was identified for episiotomy decision.

Conclusion

The level of perineal stress was an independent predictor of performing episiotomy in nulliparous women during non-instrumental vaginal delivery. Perineal stress exceeding 124.49 N was identified as the cut-off prompting midwives to perform episiotomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fanny Béchard, Geronimi J, Vieille P, et al. Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(7):331–8.CrossRefPubMed Fanny Béchard, Geronimi J, Vieille P, et al. Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(7):331–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Junior MDC, Júnior RP. Selective Episiotomy: Indications, Techinique, and Association with Severe Perineal Lacerations [J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016, 38(6): pp. 301–7. Junior MDC, Júnior RP. Selective Episiotomy: Indications, Techinique, and Association with Severe Perineal Lacerations [J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016, 38(6): pp. 301–7.
3.
go back to reference van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. [J] Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13.CrossRefPubMed van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. [J] Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081. 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3 Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081. 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3
5.
go back to reference Lund NS, Persson LKG, Jangö H, et al. Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:193–199. Lund NS, Persson LKG, Jangö H, et al. Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:193–199.
6.
go back to reference Li-zhou S, Shiyun H. Evidence-based evaluation of reducing the episiotomy [J]. Chin J practical Gynecol Obstet. 2015;31(2):127–31. (in chinese) Li-zhou S, Shiyun H. Evidence-based evaluation of reducing the episiotomy [J]. Chin J practical Gynecol Obstet. 2015;31(2):127–31. (in chinese)
7.
go back to reference Chan S, Cheung R, Yiu A, et al. Prevalence of levator ani muscle injury in Chinese women after first delivery [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(6):704–9. Chan S, Cheung R, Yiu A, et al. Prevalence of levator ani muscle injury in Chinese women after first delivery [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(6):704–9.
8.
go back to reference Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, Le Ray C, National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum. 2017;46(10):701-13. Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, Le Ray C, National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum. 2017;46(10):701-13.
9.
go back to reference Inês Melo, Katz L, Isabela Coutinho, et al. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial [J]. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):66.CrossRefPubMed Inês Melo, Katz L, Isabela Coutinho, et al. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial [J]. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):66.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rao Lin, Huang Qun, Xia Haiou. Determination of indicators and contents of comprehensive assessment of childbirth [J]. Shanghai Nursing, 2014;1: 5–7 (in Chinese). Rao Lin, Huang Qun, Xia Haiou. Determination of indicators and contents of comprehensive assessment of childbirth [J]. Shanghai Nursing, 2014;1: 5–7 (in Chinese).
11.
go back to reference Guo Lin, Ding Yan, Zhang Zheng. Establishment of predictive model of midwives’ decision on episiotomy during childbirth [J]. Chin J Nurs. 2019;54(10):1469–74. (in Chinese). Guo Lin, Ding Yan, Zhang Zheng. Establishment of predictive model of midwives’ decision on episiotomy during childbirth [J]. Chin J Nurs. 2019;54(10):1469–74. (in Chinese).
12.
go back to reference Viannay P, Codre Fdl, Brochard C, et al. Management and consequences of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries: Review [J]. J Visc Surg. 2021;158(3):231–41.CrossRefPubMed Viannay P, Codre Fdl, Brochard C, et al. Management and consequences of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries: Review [J]. J Visc Surg. 2021;158(3):231–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chen Y, Du H, Wei B, et al. Development and validation of risk—stratification delirium prediction model for critically ill patients: a prospective, observational, single-center study [J]. Medicine. 2017;95(29):e7543.CrossRef Chen Y, Du H, Wei B, et al. Development and validation of risk—stratification delirium prediction model for critically ill patients: a prospective, observational, single-center study [J]. Medicine. 2017;95(29):e7543.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bergendahl S, Ankarcrona V, Leijonhufvud Å, et al. Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial [J]. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025050.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bergendahl S, Ankarcrona V, Leijonhufvud Å, et al. Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial [J]. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025050.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Sari, Räisänen, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Mika Gissler, et al. Hospital-based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population-based register study. [J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2012, 206(4): 347–353. Sari, Räisänen, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Mika Gissler, et al. Hospital-based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population-based register study. [J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2012, 206(4): 347–353.
16.
go back to reference Lai CY, Cheung HW, Hsi Lao TT, et al. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study [J]. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(12):1116–21.CrossRef Lai CY, Cheung HW, Hsi Lao TT, et al. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study [J]. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(12):1116–21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wu LC, Malhotra R, Allen JC, et al. Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(6):1249–56.CrossRefPubMed Wu LC, Malhotra R, Allen JC, et al. Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(6):1249–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guo, Lin. Ding Yan Impact evaluation of comprehensive assessment system application during childbirth on the outcomes of perineum protection [J]. J Nurs Sci. 2018;33(6):18–22. (in Chinese). Guo, Lin. Ding Yan Impact evaluation of comprehensive assessment system application during childbirth on the outcomes of perineum protection [J]. J Nurs Sci. 2018;33(6):18–22. (in Chinese).
19.
go back to reference Zhang M, Wang M, Zhao X, et al. Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: a retrospective cohort study in Western China [J]. J Evidence-Based Med. 2018;11(4):233–41.CrossRef Zhang M, Wang M, Zhao X, et al. Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: a retrospective cohort study in Western China [J]. J Evidence-Based Med. 2018;11(4):233–41.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dharmesh S, Kapoor R, Thakar, Sultan AH. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions [J]. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1725–34.CrossRef Dharmesh S, Kapoor R, Thakar, Sultan AH. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions [J]. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1725–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Alyce N, Wilson, Homer CSE. Third- and fourth-degree tears: A review of the current evidence for prevention and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(2):175–82.CrossRef Alyce N, Wilson, Homer CSE. Third- and fourth-degree tears: A review of the current evidence for prevention and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(2):175–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Magdalena Jansova V, Kalis Z, Rusavy, et al. Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery [J]. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):65–71.CrossRefPubMed Magdalena Jansova V, Kalis Z, Rusavy, et al. Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery [J]. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):65–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Zaami S, Stark M, Beck R, et al. Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(5):1847–54.PubMed Zaami S, Stark M, Beck R, et al. Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(5):1847–54.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Thompson ASeijmonsbergen-Schermers,S, Feijen-de Jong E, et al. Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study [J]. BMJ Open. 2021;2021(11):e037536. Thompson ASeijmonsbergen-Schermers,S, Feijen-de Jong E, et al. Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study [J]. BMJ Open. 2021;2021(11):e037536.
25.
go back to reference Ye J, Chen Y, Yang H, et al. A nationwide cross-sectional survey of episiotomy practice in China [J]. Lancet Reg Health - Western Pac. 2022;19(2):100345.CrossRef Ye J, Chen Y, Yang H, et al. A nationwide cross-sectional survey of episiotomy practice in China [J]. Lancet Reg Health - Western Pac. 2022;19(2):100345.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perineal stress as a predictor of performing episiotomy in primiparous women: a prospective observational study
Authors
Binbin Xu
Qi Luo
Rongrong Wu
Ying Lu
Hongjun Ying
Yanan Xu
Zhaie Lu
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05075-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2022 Go to the issue