Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study of models and perceptions

Authors: Jenny McLeish, Maggie Redshaw

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Peer support is a flexible concept used in healthcare across diverse areas to describe the activities of individuals acting in a non-professional capacity offering support to others with whom they have some experience in common. There is little research on peer supporters and women supported in the context of the transition to parenthood and disadvantage. This study particularly focuses on peer support for women experiencing a range of vulnerabilities during pregnancy and the postnatal period, in projects which assigned trained volunteers to individual pregnant women. There were three core elements to the volunteers’ support in these projects: active listening, providing information, and signposting to local services in the area. Many also offered practical support.

Methods

This was an descriptive qualitative study, informed by phenomenological social psychology, exploring experiences and perceptions of giving and receiving voluntary peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood in England, with a particular focus on disadvantaged women. Participants took part in semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews, the transcripts of which were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Forty-seven volunteers and 42 mothers were interviewed, from nine peer support projects. The overarching themes identified were (1) ‘What is peer support?’, containing two themes: ‘befriending or mentoring’, and ‘responding to the individual’; (2) ‘Who is a peer supporter?’, containing two themes: ‘someone like me’, and ‘valuing difference’; (3) ‘The peer support relationship’, containing five themes: ‘a friend or a ‘professional friend’, ‘building relationships of trust’, ‘avoiding dependency’, ‘managing endings’, and ‘how peer supporters differ from professionals’.

Conclusion

A variety of models of volunteer peer support have been offered to pregnant women and new mothers in England. All create a structure for meaningful relationships of trust to occur between volunteers and vulnerable women. In the absence of agreed definitions for the nature and boundaries of peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood, it is important that projects provide clear information to referrers and service users about what they offer, without losing the valued flexibility and individuality of their service.
Literature
1.
2.
Johnson Z, Howell F, Molloy B. Community Mothers Programme: Randomised controlled trial of nonprofessional intervention in parenting. Br Med J. 1993;306:1449–52.CrossRef
3.
Granville G, Sugarman W. Someone in my corner: a volunteer peer support programme for pregnancy, birth and beyond. Final Evaluation Report, Parents 1st. 2012.
4.
Montgomery P, Mossey S, Adams S, Bailey PH. Stories of women involved in a postpartum depression peer support group. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21(6):524–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Dennis CL. Postpartum depression peer support: maternal perceptions from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(5):560–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Field T, Diego M, Delgado J, Medina L. Peer support and interpersonal psychotherapy groups experienced decreased prenatal depression, anxiety and cortisol. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(9):621–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Nieuwboer CC, Fukkink RG, Hermanns JM. Peer and Professional Parenting Support on the Internet: A Systematic Review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(7):518–28.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Mead S, MacNeil C. Peer Support: What Makes It Unique? Intl J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2006;10(2):29–37.
9.
CEMACH. Perinatal Mortality 2009. London: CEMACH; 2009.
10.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pregnancy and complex social factors: A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. Nice Clinical Guideline 110. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010.
11.
O’Hara M, McCabe J. Postpartum Depression: Current Status and Future Directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:379–407.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk JJ, et al., editors. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014.
13.
Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T. ‘Weighing up and balancing out’: a metasynthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(4):518–29.CrossRef
14.
Rowe RE, Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. J Public Health. 2003;25(2):113–9.CrossRef
15.
Kaunonen M, Hannula L, Tarkka MT. A systematic review of peer support interventions for breastfeeding. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(13–14):1943–54.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Spiby H, Green J, Darwin Z, Willmot H, Knox D, McLeish J, et al. Multisite implementation of trained volunteer doula support for disadvantaged childbearing women: a mixed-methods evaluation. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health Research Journals Library; 2015.
17.
Suppiah C. A Collective Evaluation of Community Parent Programmes: What Works Well and in What Circumstances? The Health Foundation, NHS South West Essex, Parents 1st. 2008.
18.
Barlow J, Coe C. Family Action Perinatal Support Project, Research Findings Report, Family Action. 2012.
19.
Barnes J, MacPherson K, Senior R. The impact on parenting and the home environment of early support to mothers with new babies. J Children’s Services. 2006;1:4–20.CrossRef
20.
Newburn M and Allez A. Birth and beyond Community Supporters – peer support for refugees and asylum seekers. Perspective; 13:8–9
21.
James D. The Health Befrienders Network: Interim Evaluation Report. London: Charities Evaluation Service; 2013.
22.
Small R, Taft AJ, Brown SJ. The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 Suppl 5:S4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
Landridge D. Phenomenology and Critical Social Psychology: Directions and Debatesin Theory and Research. Soc.Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(3):1126-42.
25.
Landridge D. Phenomenology and Critical Social Psychology: Directions and Debates in Theory and Research. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(3):1126–42. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1751-9004.​2008.​00114.​x.Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Br J Psychol. 2000;91:1–20.
26.
Pidgeon N, Henwood K. Using grounded theory in psychological research. In: Hayes N, editor. Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Hove: Psychology Press; 1997.
27.
Tindall C. Issues of evaluation. In: Banister P, Burman E, Parker I, Taylor M, Tindall C, editors. Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994.
28.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
29.
Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction; 1967.
30.
31.
Dennis C. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40:321–32.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Davidson L, Chinman M, Sells D, Rowe M. Peer Support Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Report From the Field. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(3):443–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study of models and perceptions
Authors
Jenny McLeish
Maggie Redshaw
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0685-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Prevalence of prescribing in pregnancy using the Irish primary care research network: a pilot study

Research article

Prevalence and predictors of unintended pregnancy among women: an analysis of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey

Research article

After surgery: the effects of life-saving caesarean sections in Burkina Faso

Research article

Small for gestational age births among South Indian women: temporal trend and risk factors from 1996 to 2010

Research article

Soluble receptors for advanced glycation end products and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand serum levels as markers of premature labor

Research article

Searching for the definition of macrosomia through an outcome-based approach in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey in Africa, Asia and Latin America