Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Pain assessment tools in adults with communication disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Álvaro Sabater-Gárriz, Jesús Molina-Mula, Pedro Montoya, Inmaculada Riquelme

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Verbal communication is the "gold standard" for assessing pain. Consequently, individuals with communication disorders are particularly vulnerable to incomplete pain management. This review aims at identifying the current pain assessment instruments for adult patients with communication disorders.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted on PubMed, PEDRO, EBSCOhost, VHL and Cochrane databases from 2011 to 2023 using MeSH terms “pain assessment, “nonverbal communication” and “communication disorders” in conjunction with additional inclusion criteria: studies limited to humans, interventions involving adult patients, and empirical investigations.

Results

Fifty articles were included in the review. Seven studies report sufficient data to perform the meta-analysis. Observational scales are the most common instruments to evaluate pain in individuals with communication disorders followed by physiological measures and facial recognition systems. While most pain assessments rely on observational scales, current evidence does not strongly endorse one scale over others for clinical practice. However, specific observational scales appear to be particularly suitable for identifying pain during certain potentially painful procedures, such as suctioning and mobilization, in these populations. Additionally, specific observational scales appear to be well-suited for certain conditions, such as mechanically ventilated patients.

Conclusions

While observational scales dominate pain assessment, no universal tool exists for adults with communication disorders. Specific scales exhibit promise for distinct populations, yet the diverse landscape of tools hampers a one-size-fits-all solution. Crucially, further high-quality research, offering quantitative data like reliability findings, is needed to identify optimal tools for various contexts. Clinicians should be informed to select tools judiciously, recognizing the nuanced appropriateness of each in diverse clinical situations.

Trial registration

This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) with the ID: CRD42022323655.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fox MA, Ayyangar R, Parten R, Haapala HJ, Schilling SG, Kalpakjian CZ. Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(1):69–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13980. (Epub 2018 Jul 27 PMID: 30051908).CrossRefPubMed Fox MA, Ayyangar R, Parten R, Haapala HJ, Schilling SG, Kalpakjian CZ. Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(1):69–74. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dmcn.​13980. (Epub 2018 Jul 27 PMID: 30051908).CrossRefPubMed
11.
14.
go back to reference Krupić F, Bišćević M, Spahić E, Jašarević A, Jašarević M, Grbić K, Hamrin-Senorski E, Svantesson E, Čustović S, Westin O. Experience of nurses in assessing postoperative pain in hip fracture patients suffering from dementia in nursing homes. Med Glas (Zenica). 2020;17(1):216–23. https://doi.org/10.17392/1042-20. (PMID: 31663321).CrossRefPubMed Krupić F, Bišćević M, Spahić E, Jašarević A, Jašarević M, Grbić K, Hamrin-Senorski E, Svantesson E, Čustović S, Westin O. Experience of nurses in assessing postoperative pain in hip fracture patients suffering from dementia in nursing homes. Med Glas (Zenica). 2020;17(1):216–23. https://​doi.​org/​10.​17392/​1042-20. (PMID: 31663321).CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lechowicz K, Karolak I, Drożdżal S, Żukowski M, Szylińska A, Białecka M, Rotter I, Kotfis K. Acute and Chronic pain learning and teaching in medical school-an observational cross-sectional study regarding preparation and self-confidence of clinical and pre-clinical medical students. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(9):533. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55090533. PMID:31454932;PMCID:PMC6780207.CrossRefPubMed Lechowicz K, Karolak I, Drożdżal S, Żukowski M, Szylińska A, Białecka M, Rotter I, Kotfis K. Acute and Chronic pain learning and teaching in medical school-an observational cross-sectional study regarding preparation and self-confidence of clinical and pre-clinical medical students. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(9):533. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​medicina55090533​. PMID:31454932;PMCID:PMC6780207.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Klarer N, Rickenbacher H, Kasser S, Depoorter A, Wellmann S. Electrophysiological measurement of noxious-evoked brain activity in neonates using a flat-tip probe coupled to electroencephalography. J Vis Exp. 2017;129:56531. https://doi.org/10.3791/56531. PMID:29286456;PMCID:PMC5755512.CrossRef Klarer N, Rickenbacher H, Kasser S, Depoorter A, Wellmann S. Electrophysiological measurement of noxious-evoked brain activity in neonates using a flat-tip probe coupled to electroencephalography. J Vis Exp. 2017;129:56531. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3791/​56531. PMID:29286456;PMCID:PMC5755512.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jersak T, Noritz G. Evaluation of pain in adults with childhood-onset disabilities and communication difficulties. Front Neurol. 2021;5(12) PMID:34675866;PMCID:PMC8523837.CrossRef Jersak T, Noritz G. Evaluation of pain in adults with childhood-onset disabilities and communication difficulties. Front Neurol. 2021;5(12) PMID:34675866;PMCID:PMC8523837.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928 PMID: 22008217; PMCID: PMC3196245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928 PMID: 22008217; PMCID: PMC3196245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Olmo RS. Programa de habilidades en lectura crítica español (CASPe). NefroPlus. 2017;9(1):100–1. Olmo RS. Programa de habilidades en lectura crítica español (CASPe). NefroPlus. 2017;9(1):100–1.
31.
go back to reference Miller J. The Scottish intercollegiate guidelines network (SIGN). The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease. 2002;2(1):47–9.CrossRef Miller J. The Scottish intercollegiate guidelines network (SIGN). The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease. 2002;2(1):47–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications. (2012). Routledge. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications. (2012). Routledge.
35.
go back to reference Hedges, L. V. Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. journal of Educational Statistics, (1981). 6(2), 107-128 Hedges, L. V. Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. journal of Educational Statistics, (1981). 6(2), 107-128
38.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097 Epub 2009 Jul 21. PMID: 19621072; PMCID: PMC2707599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097 Epub 2009 Jul 21. PMID: 19621072; PMCID: PMC2707599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Latorre-Marco I, Acevedo-Nuevo M, Solís-Muñoz M, Hernández-Sánchez L, López-López C, Sánchez-Sánchez MM, Wojtysiak-Wojcicka M, de Las Pozas-Abril J, Robleda-Font G, Frade-Mera MJ, De Blas-García R, Górgolas-Ortiz C, De la Figuera-Bayón J, Cavia-García C. Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients. Med Intensiva. 2016;40(8):463–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2016.06.004.CrossRefPubMed Latorre-Marco I, Acevedo-Nuevo M, Solís-Muñoz M, Hernández-Sánchez L, López-López C, Sánchez-Sánchez MM, Wojtysiak-Wojcicka M, de Las Pozas-Abril J, Robleda-Font G, Frade-Mera MJ, De Blas-García R, Górgolas-Ortiz C, De la Figuera-Bayón J, Cavia-García C. Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients. Med Intensiva. 2016;40(8):463–73. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​medin.​2016.​06.​004.CrossRefPubMed
62.
64.
go back to reference Kotfis K, Zegan-Barańska M, Szydłowski Ł, Żukowski M, Ely EW. Methods of pain assessment in adult intensive care unit patients - Polish version of the CPOT (Critical Care Pain Observation Tool) and BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale). Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2017.0010. (PMID: 28362033).CrossRefPubMed Kotfis K, Zegan-Barańska M, Szydłowski Ł, Żukowski M, Ely EW. Methods of pain assessment in adult intensive care unit patients - Polish version of the CPOT (Critical Care Pain Observation Tool) and BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale). Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(1):66–72. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5603/​AIT.​2017.​0010. (PMID: 28362033).CrossRefPubMed
67.
68.
go back to reference Kunz M, de Waal MWM, Achterberg WP, et al. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): a multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta-tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(1):192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1477.CrossRefPubMed Kunz M, de Waal MWM, Achterberg WP, et al. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): a multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta-tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(1):192–208. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ejp.​1477.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Haghi M, Fadayevatan R, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Kaboudi B, Foroughan M, Mahdavi B. Validation of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate-II (PACSLAC-II) in Iranian older adults with dementia living in nursing homes. Psychogeriatrics. 2020;20(3):278–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12496.CrossRefPubMed Haghi M, Fadayevatan R, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Kaboudi B, Foroughan M, Mahdavi B. Validation of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate-II (PACSLAC-II) in Iranian older adults with dementia living in nursing homes. Psychogeriatrics. 2020;20(3):278–87. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​psyg.​12496.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pain assessment tools in adults with communication disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Álvaro Sabater-Gárriz
Jesús Molina-Mula
Pedro Montoya
Inmaculada Riquelme
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03539-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Neurology 1/2024 Go to the issue