Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research

Acceleration of knee magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of compressed sensing and commercially available deep learning reconstruction: a preliminary study

Authors: Hiroyuki Akai, Koichiro Yasaka, Haruto Sugawara, Taku Tajima, Masaru Kamitani, Toshihiro Furuta, Masaaki Akahane, Naoki Yoshioka, Kuni Ohtomo, Osamu Abe, Shigeru Kiryu

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) accelerates the acquisition of 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) knee data without image deterioration.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the right knee on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. Proton-density-weighted images with one or four numbers of signal averages (NSAs) were obtained via compressed sensing, and DLR was applied to the images with 1 NSA to obtain 1NSA-DLR images. The 1NSA-DLR and 4NSA images were compared objectively (by deriving the signal-to-noise ratios of the lateral and the medial menisci and the contrast-to-noise ratios of the lateral and the medial menisci and articular cartilages) and subjectively (in terms of the visibility of the anterior cruciate ligament, the medial collateral ligament, the medial and lateral menisci, and bone) and in terms of image noise, artifacts, and overall diagnostic acceptability. The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analyses.

Results

The 1NSA-DLR images were obtained within 100 s. The signal-to-noise ratios (lateral: 3.27 ± 0.30 vs. 1.90 ± 0.13, medial: 2.71 ± 0.24 vs. 1.80 ± 0.15, both p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios (lateral: 2.61 ± 0.51 vs. 2.18 ± 0.58, medial 2.19 ± 0.32 vs. 1.97 ± 0.36, both p < 0.001) were significantly higher for 1NSA-DLR than 4NSA images. Subjectively, all anatomical structures (except bone) were significantly clearer on the 1NSA-DLR than on the 4NSA images. Also, in the former images, the noise was lower, and the overall diagnostic acceptability was higher.

Conclusion

Compared with the 4NSA images, the 1NSA-DLR images exhibited less noise, higher overall image quality, and allowed more precise visualization of the menisci and ligaments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petron DJ, Greis PE, Aoki SK, et al. Use of knee magnetic resonance imaging by primary care physicians in patients aged 40 years and older. Sports Health. 2010;2:385–90.CrossRef Petron DJ, Greis PE, Aoki SK, et al. Use of knee magnetic resonance imaging by primary care physicians in patients aged 40 years and older. Sports Health. 2010;2:385–90.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pai DR, Strouse PJ. MRI of the pediatric knee. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1019–27.CrossRef Pai DR, Strouse PJ. MRI of the pediatric knee. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1019–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Walczak BE, McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Zelazny A, Tedeschi F, Cole BJ. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg. 2008;21:27–33.CrossRef Walczak BE, McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Zelazny A, Tedeschi F, Cole BJ. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg. 2008;21:27–33.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chien A, Weaver JS, Kinne E, Omar I. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Pol J Radiol. 2020;85:e509–31.CrossRef Chien A, Weaver JS, Kinne E, Omar I. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Pol J Radiol. 2020;85:e509–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yusuf E, Kortekaas MC, Watt I, Huizinga TW, Kloppenburg M. Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:60–7.CrossRef Yusuf E, Kortekaas MC, Watt I, Huizinga TW, Kloppenburg M. Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:60–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kwok WE, Zhong J, You Z, Seo G, Totterman SM. A four-element phased array coil for high resolution and parallel MR imaging of the knee. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:961–7.CrossRef Kwok WE, Zhong J, You Z, Seo G, Totterman SM. A four-element phased array coil for high resolution and parallel MR imaging of the knee. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:961–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zuo J, Li X, Banerjee S, Han E, Majumdar S. Parallel imaging of knee cartilage at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1001–9.CrossRef Zuo J, Li X, Banerjee S, Han E, Majumdar S. Parallel imaging of knee cartilage at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1001–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:55–72.CrossRef Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:55–72.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fritz J, Fritz B, Thawait GG, Meyer H, Gilson WD, Raithel E. Three-dimensional CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE for 5-minute high-resolution MRI of the knee. Invest Radiol. 2016;51:609–17.CrossRef Fritz J, Fritz B, Thawait GG, Meyer H, Gilson WD, Raithel E. Three-dimensional CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE for 5-minute high-resolution MRI of the knee. Invest Radiol. 2016;51:609–17.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kijowski R, Rosas H, Samsonov A, King K, Peters R, Liu F. Knee imaging: Rapid three-dimensional fast spin-echo using compressed sensing. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1712–22.CrossRef Kijowski R, Rosas H, Samsonov A, King K, Peters R, Liu F. Knee imaging: Rapid three-dimensional fast spin-echo using compressed sensing. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1712–22.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM, Sparse MRI. The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1182–95.CrossRef Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM, Sparse MRI. The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1182–95.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barth M, Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser BA. Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:63–81.CrossRef Barth M, Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser BA. Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:63–81.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Del Grande F, Rashidi A, Luna R, et al. Five-minute five-sequence knee MRI using combined simultaneous multislice and parallel imaging acceleration: comparison with 10-Minute parallel imaging knee MRI. Radiology. 2021;299:635–46.CrossRef Del Grande F, Rashidi A, Luna R, et al. Five-minute five-sequence knee MRI using combined simultaneous multislice and parallel imaging acceleration: comparison with 10-Minute parallel imaging knee MRI. Radiology. 2021;299:635–46.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36:257–72.CrossRef Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O. Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36:257–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Weston AD, Korfiatis P, Kline TL, et al. Automated abdominal segmentation of CT scans for body composition analysis using deep learning. Radiology. 2019;290:669–79.CrossRef Weston AD, Korfiatis P, Kline TL, et al. Automated abdominal segmentation of CT scans for body composition analysis using deep learning. Radiology. 2019;290:669–79.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, et al. Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal Cancer on multiparametric MR. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5301.CrossRef Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, et al. Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal Cancer on multiparametric MR. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5301.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Akai H, Abe O, Kiryu S. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for differentiation of liver masses at dynamic contrast-enhanced CT: a preliminary study. Radiology. 2018;286:887–96.CrossRef Yasaka K, Akai H, Abe O, Kiryu S. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for differentiation of liver masses at dynamic contrast-enhanced CT: a preliminary study. Radiology. 2018;286:887–96.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kiryu S, Yasaka K, Akai H, et al. Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6891–9.CrossRef Kiryu S, Yasaka K, Akai H, et al. Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6891–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR Imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020;19:195–206.CrossRef Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR Imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020;19:195–206.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Herrmann J, Koerzdoerfer G, Nickel D, et al. Feasibility and implementation of a deep learning MR reconstruction for TSE sequences in musculoskeletal imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:1484.CrossRef Herrmann J, Koerzdoerfer G, Nickel D, et al. Feasibility and implementation of a deep learning MR reconstruction for TSE sequences in musculoskeletal imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:1484.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Naganawa S, Nakamichi R, Ichikawa K, et al. MR imaging of endolymphatic Hydrops: utility of iHYDROPS-Mi2 combined with deep learning reconstruction denoising. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021;20:272–9.CrossRef Naganawa S, Nakamichi R, Ichikawa K, et al. MR imaging of endolymphatic Hydrops: utility of iHYDROPS-Mi2 combined with deep learning reconstruction denoising. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021;20:272–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wong S, Steinbach L, Zhao J, Stehling C, Ma CB, Link TM. Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:761–9.CrossRef Wong S, Steinbach L, Zhao J, Stehling C, Ma CB, Link TM. Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:761–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Helito CP, Helito PV, Costa HP, et al. MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 1.5-T scans. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1421–7.CrossRef Helito CP, Helito PV, Costa HP, et al. MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 1.5-T scans. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1421–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Tanishima T, Ohtake Y, et al. Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:6118–25.CrossRef Yasaka K, Tanishima T, Ohtake Y, et al. Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:6118–25.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tajima T, Akai H, Sugawara H, et al. Feasibility of accelerated whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging using a deep learning-based noise-reduction technique in patients with prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;92:169–79.CrossRef Tajima T, Akai H, Sugawara H, et al. Feasibility of accelerated whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging using a deep learning-based noise-reduction technique in patients with prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;92:169–79.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Altahawi FF, Blount KJ, Morley NP, Raithel E, Omar IM. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:7–15.CrossRef Altahawi FF, Blount KJ, Morley NP, Raithel E, Omar IM. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:7–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Recht MP, Zbontar J, Sodickson DK, et al. Using Deep Learning to accelerate knee MRI at 3 T: results of an interchangeability study. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:1421–9.CrossRef Recht MP, Zbontar J, Sodickson DK, et al. Using Deep Learning to accelerate knee MRI at 3 T: results of an interchangeability study. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:1421–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lefevre N, Naouri JF, Herman S, Gerometta A, Klouche S, Bohu Y. A current review of the meniscus imaging: proposition of a useful tool for its radiologic analysis. Radiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:8329296. Lefevre N, Naouri JF, Herman S, Gerometta A, Klouche S, Bohu Y. A current review of the meniscus imaging: proposition of a useful tool for its radiologic analysis. Radiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:8329296.
29.
go back to reference Tajima T, Akai H, Sugawara H, et al. Breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 1.5T using a deep learning-based noise-reduction approach: comparison with the conventional respiratory-triggered technique. Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109994.CrossRef Tajima T, Akai H, Sugawara H, et al. Breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 1.5T using a deep learning-based noise-reduction approach: comparison with the conventional respiratory-triggered technique. Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109994.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acceleration of knee magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of compressed sensing and commercially available deep learning reconstruction: a preliminary study
Authors
Hiroyuki Akai
Koichiro Yasaka
Haruto Sugawara
Taku Tajima
Masaru Kamitani
Toshihiro Furuta
Masaaki Akahane
Naoki Yoshioka
Kuni Ohtomo
Osamu Abe
Shigeru Kiryu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-00962-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue