Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Research

Episodic disability questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States

Authors: Kelly K. O’Brien, Kristine M. Erlandson, Darren A. Brown, Soo Chan Carusone, Jaime H. Vera, Colm Bergin, Lisa Avery, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Steven E. Hanna, Richard Harding, Patricia Solomon, Natalie St. Clair-Sullivan, Noreen O’Shea, Carolann Murray, Marta Boffito, George Da Silva, Brittany Torres, Kiera McDuff, Aileen M. Davis

Published in: BMC Infectious Diseases | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV.

Methods

We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha; > 0.7 acceptable), and test–retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; > 0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity).

Results

Three hundred fifty nine participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test–retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19–25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37–54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44–76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions

The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test–retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Serrao R, Pinero C, Velez J, Coutinho D, Maltez F, Lino S, Sarmento ECR, Tavares AP, Pacheco P, Lopes MJ, et al. Non-AIDS-related comorbidities in people living with HIV-1 aged 50 years and older: the AGING POSITIVE study. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;79:94–100.PubMedCrossRef Serrao R, Pinero C, Velez J, Coutinho D, Maltez F, Lino S, Sarmento ECR, Tavares AP, Pacheco P, Lopes MJ, et al. Non-AIDS-related comorbidities in people living with HIV-1 aged 50 years and older: the AGING POSITIVE study. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;79:94–100.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference S Zicari, L Sessa, N Cotugno, A Ruggiero, E Morrocchi, C Concato, S Rocca, P Zangari, EC Manno, P Palma. Immune activation inflammation and Non-AIDS Co-Morbidities in HIV-Infected patients under long-term ART. Viruses. 2019;11:200.CrossRef S Zicari, L Sessa, N Cotugno, A Ruggiero, E Morrocchi, C Concato, S Rocca, P Zangari, EC Manno, P Palma. Immune activation inflammation and Non-AIDS Co-Morbidities in HIV-Infected patients under long-term ART. Viruses. 2019;11:200.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Guaraldi G, Palella FJ Jr. Clinical implications of aging with HIV Infection: perspectives and the future medical care agenda. AIDS. 2017;31(Suppl 2):129-S135.CrossRef Guaraldi G, Palella FJ Jr. Clinical implications of aging with HIV Infection: perspectives and the future medical care agenda. AIDS. 2017;31(Suppl 2):129-S135.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, Strike C, Young NL, Davis AM. Exploring disability from the perspective of adults living with HIV/AIDS: development of a conceptual framework. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, Strike C, Young NL, Davis AM. Exploring disability from the perspective of adults living with HIV/AIDS: development of a conceptual framework. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Davis AM, Strike C, Young NL, Bayoumi AM. Putting episodic disability into context: a qualitative study exploring factors that influence disability experienced by adults living with HIV/AIDS. J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12:5.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien KK, Davis AM, Strike C, Young NL, Bayoumi AM. Putting episodic disability into context: a qualitative study exploring factors that influence disability experienced by adults living with HIV/AIDS. J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12:5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bristowe K, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Ni Cheallaigh C, et al. Towards person-centred care for people living with HIV: what core outcomes matter, and how might we assess them? A cross-national multi-centre qualitative study with key stakeholders. HIV Med. 2019;20:542–54.PubMedCrossRef Bristowe K, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Ni Cheallaigh C, et al. Towards person-centred care for people living with HIV: what core outcomes matter, and how might we assess them? A cross-national multi-centre qualitative study with key stakeholders. HIV Med. 2019;20:542–54.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Black N, Burke L, Forrest CB, Sieberer UH, Ahmed S, Valderas JM, Bartlett SJ, Alonso J. Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1103–12.PubMedCrossRef Black N, Burke L, Forrest CB, Sieberer UH, Ahmed S, Valderas JM, Bartlett SJ, Alonso J. Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1103–12.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH. Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ. 2019;364:k5267.PubMedCrossRef Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH. Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ. 2019;364:k5267.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, King K, Alexander R, Solomon P. Community engagement in health status instrument development: experience with the HIV disability questionnaire. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014;8:549–59.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, King K, Alexander R, Solomon P. Community engagement in health status instrument development: experience with the HIV disability questionnaire. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014;8:549–59.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Hanna S, Gardner S, Bayoumi AM, Rueda S, Hart TA, Cooper C, Solomon P, Rourke SB, Davis AM. Validation of the episodic disability framework with adults living with HIV. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:319–29.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien KK, Hanna S, Gardner S, Bayoumi AM, Rueda S, Hart TA, Cooper C, Solomon P, Rourke SB, Davis AM. Validation of the episodic disability framework with adults living with HIV. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:319–29.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, Bereket T, Swinton M, Alexander R, King K, Solomon P. Sensibility assessment of the HIV disability questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:566–77.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien KK, Bayoumi AM, Bereket T, Swinton M, Alexander R, King K, Solomon P. Sensibility assessment of the HIV disability questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:566–77.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Bergin C, O’Dea S, Stratford P, Iku N, Bayoumi AM. Reliability and validity of a new HIV-specific questionnaire with adults living with HIV in Canada and Ireland: the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:124.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Bergin C, O’Dea S, Stratford P, Iku N, Bayoumi AM. Reliability and validity of a new HIV-specific questionnaire with adults living with HIV in Canada and Ireland: the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:124.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brown DA, Simmons B, Boffito M, Aubry R, Nwokolo N, Harding R, O’Brien KK. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the HIV disability questionnaire among adults living with HIV in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional self-report measurement study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213222.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brown DA, Simmons B, Boffito M, Aubry R, Nwokolo N, Harding R, O’Brien KK. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the HIV disability questionnaire among adults living with HIV in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional self-report measurement study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213222.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Kietrys D, Galantino ML, Parrott JS, Davis T, Tran Q, Aubry R, Solomon P. Reliability and validity of the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ) with adults living with HIV in the United States. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019;18:2325958219888461.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Kietrys D, Galantino ML, Parrott JS, Davis T, Tran Q, Aubry R, Solomon P. Reliability and validity of the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ) with adults living with HIV in the United States. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019;18:2325958219888461.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Bayoumi AM. Measuring disability experienced by adults living with HIV: assessing construct validity of the HIV disability questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005456.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Bayoumi AM. Measuring disability experienced by adults living with HIV: assessing construct validity of the HIV disability questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005456.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vader K, Chan Carusone S, Aubry R, Ahluwalia P, Murray C, Baxter L, Robinson G, Ibanez-Carrasco F, Stewart A, Solomon P, O’Brien KK. Examining the utility of the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ) in clinical practice: perspectives of people living with HIV and healthcare providers. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2022;21:23259582221079148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vader K, Chan Carusone S, Aubry R, Ahluwalia P, Murray C, Baxter L, Robinson G, Ibanez-Carrasco F, Stewart A, Solomon P, O’Brien KK. Examining the utility of the HIV disability questionnaire (HDQ) in clinical practice: perspectives of people living with HIV and healthcare providers. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2022;21:23259582221079148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Dzingina M, Harding R, Gao W, Namisango E, Avery L, Davis AM. Developing a short-form version of the HIV disability questionnaire (SF-HDQ) for use in clinical practice: a Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Dzingina M, Harding R, Gao W, Namisango E, Avery L, Davis AM. Developing a short-form version of the HIV disability questionnaire (SF-HDQ) for use in clinical practice: a Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Carusone SC, Erlandson KM, Bergin C, Bayoumi AM, Hanna SE, Harding R, Brown DA, Vera JH, et al. Assessing the sensibility and utility of a short-form version of the HIV disability questionnaire in clinical practice settings in Canada, Ireland and the USA: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e062008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Brien KK, Solomon P, Carusone SC, Erlandson KM, Bergin C, Bayoumi AM, Hanna SE, Harding R, Brown DA, Vera JH, et al. Assessing the sensibility and utility of a short-form version of the HIV disability questionnaire in clinical practice settings in Canada, Ireland and the USA: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e062008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.PubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:2197–218.PubMedCrossRef Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:2197–218.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Terwee CB. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1171–9.PubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Terwee CB. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1171–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference World Health Organization. World Health Organizations Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS-2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. World Health Organization. World Health Organizations Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS-2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
25.
go back to reference Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring Health and Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring Health and Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization;  2010.
26.
go back to reference Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114:163–73.PubMedCrossRef Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114:163–73.PubMedCrossRef
27.
29.
go back to reference Paton M, Lane R. Clinimetrics: world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. J Physiother. 2020;66:199.PubMedCrossRef Paton M, Lane R. Clinimetrics: world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. J Physiother. 2020;66:199.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, Luciano JV. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2347–80.PubMedCrossRef Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, Luciano JV. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2347–80.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2 in patients with chronic Diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2 in patients with chronic Diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Barbosa KSS, Castro SS, Leite CF, Nacci FR, Accioly MF. Validation of the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for individuals with HIV/AIDS. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25:837–44.PubMedCrossRef Barbosa KSS, Castro SS, Leite CF, Nacci FR, Accioly MF. Validation of the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for individuals with HIV/AIDS. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25:837–44.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Do AN, Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS, Beer L, Strine TW, Schulden JD, Fagan JL, Freedman MS, Skarbinski J. Excess burden of depression among HIV-infected persons receiving medical care in the United States: data from the medical monitoring project and the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92842.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Do AN, Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS, Beer L, Strine TW, Schulden JD, Fagan JL, Freedman MS, Skarbinski J. Excess burden of depression among HIV-infected persons receiving medical care in the United States: data from the medical monitoring project and the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92842.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Yu Y, Yang JP, Shiu CS, Simoni JM, Xiao S, Chen WT, Rao D, Wang M. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical outcomes Study Social Support Survey among people living with HIV/AIDS in China. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28:328–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yu Y, Yang JP, Shiu CS, Simoni JM, Xiao S, Chen WT, Rao D, Wang M. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical outcomes Study Social Support Survey among people living with HIV/AIDS in China. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28:328–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Terwee CB. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a Core Outcome Set - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17:449.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Terwee CB. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a Core Outcome Set - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17:449.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:735–43.PubMedCrossRef Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:735–43.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference The R Foundation. R-psych; the R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 4.1.3. Vienna: Bell Laboratories; 2023. The R Foundation. R-psych; the R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 4.1.3. Vienna: Bell Laboratories; 2023.
40.
go back to reference IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 28). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2023. IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 28). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2023.
41.
go back to reference Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. Second. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. Second. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
42.
go back to reference Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, Stauffer JW, Hays RD, Mayo FDAP-ROCMG. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):94-S105.CrossRef Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, Stauffer JW, Hays RD, Mayo FDAP-ROCMG. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):94-S105.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. Third. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. Third. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
44.
go back to reference Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Butt Z, Nowinski CJ, Rothrock N, Lohr KN. Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2015.CrossRef Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Butt Z, Nowinski CJ, Rothrock N, Lohr KN. Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2015.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, Revicki DA, Symonds T, Parada A, Alonso J. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179–93.PubMedCrossRef Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, Revicki DA, Symonds T, Parada A, Alonso J. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179–93.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:233–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:233–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ovretveit J, Zubkoff L, Nelson EC, Frampton S, Knudsen JL, Zimlichman E. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29:874–9.PubMedCrossRef Ovretveit J, Zubkoff L, Nelson EC, Frampton S, Knudsen JL, Zimlichman E. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29:874–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Washington Group on Disability Statistics. The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning - enhanced questions. University College London; 2022. Washington Group on Disability Statistics. The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning - enhanced questions. University College London; 2022.
49.
go back to reference O’Brien KK, Brown DA, Bergin C, Erlandson KM, Vera JH, Avery L, Carusone SC, Cheung AM, Goulding S, Harding R, et al. Long COVID and episodic disability: advancing the conceptualisation, measurement and knowledge of episodic disability among people living with long COVID - protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e060826.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien KK, Brown DA, Bergin C, Erlandson KM, Vera JH, Avery L, Carusone SC, Cheung AM, Goulding S, Harding R, et al. Long COVID and episodic disability: advancing the conceptualisation, measurement and knowledge of episodic disability among people living with long COVID - protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e060826.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Public Health Agency of Canada. Estimates of HIV incidence, prevalence and Canada’s progress on meeting the 90-90-90 HIV targets, 2020. Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2022. Public Health Agency of Canada. Estimates of HIV incidence, prevalence and Canada’s progress on meeting the 90-90-90 HIV targets, 2020. Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2022.
51.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and Women. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 2022. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and Women. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 2022.
52.
go back to reference Brown DA, Harding R, O’Brien KK, Tariq S, Boffito M, Milinkovich A, Asboe D, Flavell C. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the short form HIV Disability Questionnaire among women living with HIV in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional self-report measurement study. London, United Kingom: British HIV Association (BHIVA); 2022. Brown DA, Harding R, O’Brien KK, Tariq S, Boffito M, Milinkovich A, Asboe D, Flavell C. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the short form HIV Disability Questionnaire among women living with HIV in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional self-report measurement study. London, United Kingom: British HIV Association (BHIVA); 2022.
53.
go back to reference Adeleke A, Franzsen D, de Witt P, Smith R. Validity and reliability of the HIV disability questionnaire for people living with HIV in South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res. 2022;21:364–72.PubMedCrossRef Adeleke A, Franzsen D, de Witt P, Smith R. Validity and reliability of the HIV disability questionnaire for people living with HIV in South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res. 2022;21:364–72.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Episodic disability questionnaire (EDQ) measurement properties among adults living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States
Authors
Kelly K. O’Brien
Kristine M. Erlandson
Darren A. Brown
Soo Chan Carusone
Jaime H. Vera
Colm Bergin
Lisa Avery
Ahmed M. Bayoumi
Steven E. Hanna
Richard Harding
Patricia Solomon
Natalie St. Clair-Sullivan
Noreen O’Shea
Carolann Murray
Marta Boffito
George Da Silva
Brittany Torres
Kiera McDuff
Aileen M. Davis
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2334
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08958-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Infectious Diseases 1/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine