Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

A dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials based on Bayesian stochastic approximation

Authors: Jin Xu, Dapeng Zhang, Rongji Mu

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current dose-finding designs for phase I clinical trials can correctly select the MTD in a range of 30–80% depending on various conditions based on a sample of 30 subjects. However, there is still an unmet need for efficiency and cost saving.

Methods

We propose a novel dose-finding design based on Bayesian stochastic approximation. The design features utilization of dose level information through local adaptive modelling and free assumption of toxicity probabilities and hyper-parameters. It allows a flexible target toxicity rate and varying cohort size. And we extend it to accommodate historical information via prior effective sample size. We compare the proposed design to some commonly used methods in terms of accuracy and safety by simulation.

Results

On average, our design can improve the percentage of correct selection to about 60% when the MTD resides at a early or middle position in the search domain and perform comparably to other competitive methods otherwise. A free online software package is provided to facilitate the application, where a simple decision tree for the design can be pre-printed beforehand.

Conclusion

The paper proposes a novel dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials. Applying the design to future cancer trials can greatly improve the efficiency, consequently save cost and shorten the development period.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zhou H, Yuan Y, Nie L. Accuracy, safety, and reliability of novel phase I trial designs. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4357–64.CrossRef Zhou H, Yuan Y, Nie L. Accuracy, safety, and reliability of novel phase I trial designs. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4357–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Storer BE. Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 1989;45:925–37.CrossRef Storer BE. Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 1989;45:925–37.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Reiner E, Paoletti X, O’Quigley J. Operating characteristics of the standard phase I clinical trial design. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1999;30:303–15.CrossRef Reiner E, Paoletti X, O’Quigley J. Operating characteristics of the standard phase I clinical trial design. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1999;30:303–15.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:708–20.CrossRef Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:708–20.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990;46:33–48.CrossRef O’Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990;46:33–48.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S. Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med. 1998;17:1103–20.CrossRef Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S. Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med. 1998;17:1103–20.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tighiouart M, Rogatko A. Dose Finding with Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) in Cancer Clinical Trials. Stat Sci. 2010;25:217–26.CrossRef Tighiouart M, Rogatko A. Dose Finding with Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) in Cancer Clinical Trials. Stat Sci. 2010;25:217–26.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T. Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med. 2008;27:2420–39.CrossRef Neuenschwander B, Branson M, Gsponer T. Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat Med. 2008;27:2420–39.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ji Y, Liu P, Li Y, Bekele BN. A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. Clin Trials. 2010;7:653–63.CrossRef Ji Y, Liu P, Li Y, Bekele BN. A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. Clin Trials. 2010;7:653–63.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Guo W, Wang SJ, Yang S, Lynn H, Ji Y. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressing Ockham’s razor: mTPI-2. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;58:23–33.CrossRef Guo W, Wang SJ, Yang S, Lynn H, Ji Y. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressing Ockham’s razor: mTPI-2. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;58:23–33.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yan F, Mandrekar SJ, Yuan Y. Keyboard: a novel Bayesian toxicity probability interval design for phase I clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3994–4003.CrossRef Yan F, Mandrekar SJ, Yuan Y. Keyboard: a novel Bayesian toxicity probability interval design for phase I clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3994–4003.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Liu S, Yuan Y. Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials. J R Stat Soc Ser C. 2015;64:507–23.CrossRef Liu S, Yuan Y. Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials. J R Stat Soc Ser C. 2015;64:507–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yuan Y, Hess KR, Hilsenbeck SG, Gilbert MR. Bayesian optimal interval design: A simple and well-performing design for phase I oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4291–301.CrossRef Yuan Y, Hess KR, Hilsenbeck SG, Gilbert MR. Bayesian optimal interval design: A simple and well-performing design for phase I oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4291–301.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Robbins H, Monro S. A Stochastic Approximation Method. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22:400–7.CrossRef Robbins H, Monro S. A Stochastic Approximation Method. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22:400–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Joseph VR. Efficient Robbins-Monro procedure for binary data. Biometrika. 2004;91:461–70.CrossRef Joseph VR. Efficient Robbins-Monro procedure for binary data. Biometrika. 2004;91:461–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cheung YK. Stochastic approximation and modern model based designs for dose-finding clinical trials. Stat Sci. 2010;25:191–201.CrossRef Cheung YK. Stochastic approximation and modern model based designs for dose-finding clinical trials. Stat Sci. 2010;25:191–201.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xu J, Mu R, Xiong C. A Bayesian stochastic approximation method. J Stat Plan Infer. 2021;211:391–401.CrossRef Xu J, Mu R, Xiong C. A Bayesian stochastic approximation method. J Stat Plan Infer. 2021;211:391–401.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cheung YK. Coherence principles in dose-finding studies. Biometrika. 2005;92:863–73.CrossRef Cheung YK. Coherence principles in dose-finding studies. Biometrika. 2005;92:863–73.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oron AP, Azriel D, Hoff PD. Dose-finding designs: the role of convergence properties. Int J Biostat. 2011;7:39. Oron AP, Azriel D, Hoff PD. Dose-finding designs: the role of convergence properties. Int J Biostat. 2011;7:39.
22.
go back to reference Simon R, Rubinstein L, Arbuck SG, Christian MC, Freidlin B, Collins J. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1138–47.CrossRef Simon R, Rubinstein L, Arbuck SG, Christian MC, Freidlin B, Collins J. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1138–47.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Riviere MK, Yuan Y, Dubois F, Zohar S. A Bayesian dose-finding design for drug combination clinical trials based on the logistic model. Pharm Stat. 2014;13:247–57.CrossRef Riviere MK, Yuan Y, Dubois F, Zohar S. A Bayesian dose-finding design for drug combination clinical trials based on the logistic model. Pharm Stat. 2014;13:247–57.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Lee JJ, Wang S, Bailey S, Yuan Y. Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trial designs. Pharm Stat. 2021;20:1017–34.CrossRef Zhou Y, Lee JJ, Wang S, Bailey S, Yuan Y. Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trial designs. Pharm Stat. 2021;20:1017–34.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Duan Y, Wang SJ, Ji Y. Hi3+3: A Model-Assisted Dose-Finding Design Borrowing Historical Data. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021;109:106437. Duan Y, Wang SJ, Ji Y. Hi3+3: A Model-Assisted Dose-Finding Design Borrowing Historical Data. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021;109:106437.
26.
go back to reference Liu M, Wang SJ, Ji Y. The i3+3 design for phase I clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2020;30:294–304.CrossRef Liu M, Wang SJ, Ji Y. The i3+3 design for phase I clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2020;30:294–304.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ji Y, Wang SJ. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3+ 3 design for practical phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1785–91.CrossRef Ji Y, Wang SJ. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3+ 3 design for practical phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1785–91.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Clertant M, O’Quigley J. Semiparametric dose finding methods: special cases. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2017;79:1487–508. Clertant M, O’Quigley J. Semiparametric dose finding methods: special cases. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2017;79:1487–508.
Metadata
Title
A dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials based on Bayesian stochastic approximation
Authors
Jin Xu
Dapeng Zhang
Rongji Mu
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01741-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2022 Go to the issue