Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

An exploration of the subjective social status construct in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Authors: Karen L. Tang, Louise Pilote, Hassan Behlouli, Jenny Godley, William A. Ghali, for the GENESIS-PRAXY investigators

Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perception of low subjective social status (SSS) relative to others in society or in the community has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Our objectives were to determine whether low SSS in society was associated with barriers to access to care or hospital readmission in patients with established cardiovascular disease, and whether perceptions of discordantly high SSS in the community modified this association.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study from 2009 to 2013 in Canada, United States, and Switzerland in patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Data on access to care and SSS variables were obtained at baseline. Readmission data were obtained 12 months post-discharge. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to model the odds of access to care and readmission outcomes in those with low versus high societal SSS.

Results

One thousand ninety patients admitted with ACS provided both societal and community SSS rankings. The low societal SSS cohort had greater odds of reporting that their health was affected by lack of health care access (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11, 1.97) and of experiencing cardiac readmissions (1.88, 95% CI 1.15, 3.06). Within the low societal SSS cohort, there was a trend toward fewer access to care barriers for those with discordantly high community SSS though findings varied based on the outcome variable. There were no statistically significant differences in readmissions based on community SSS rankings.

Conclusion

Low societal SSS is associated with increased barriers to access to care and cardiac readmissions. Though attenuated, these trends remained even when adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors, suggesting that perceived low societal SSS has health effects above and beyond objective socioeconomic factors. Furthermore, high community SSS may potentially mitigate the risk of experiencing barriers to access to health care in those with low societal SSS, though these associations were not statistically significant. Subjective social status relative to society versus relative to the community seem to represent distinct concepts. Insight into the differences between these two SSS constructs is imperative in the understanding of cardiovascular health and future development of public health policies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1973–98.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Alter DA, Franklin B, Ko DT, Austin PC, Lee DS, Oh PI, Stukel TA, Tu JV. Socioeconomic status, functional recovery, and long-term mortality among patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2014;8(6):e65130.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bernheim SM, Spertus JA, Reid KJ, Bradley EH, Desai RA, Peterson ED, Rathore SS, Normand SL, Jones PG, Rahimi A, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2007;153(2):313–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Avrunin J, Pekow PS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Income inequality and 30 day outcomes after acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2013;346:f521.
5.
Shah SJ, Krumholz HM, Reid KJ, Rathore SS, Mandawat A, Spertus JA, Ross JS. Financial stress and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Edmondson D, Green P, Ye S, Halazun HJ, Davidson KW. Psychological stress and 30-day all-cause hospital readmission in acute coronary syndrome patients: an observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337(8754):1387–93.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jackman MR, Jackman RW. An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. Am Sociol Rev. 1973;38(5):569–82.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Ghaed SG, Gallo LC. Subjective social status, objective socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk in women. Health Psychol. 2007;26(6):668–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Adler N, Singh-Manoux A, Schwartz J, Stewart J, Matthews K, Marmot MG. Social status and health: a comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European- and African-Americans in CARDIA. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(5):1034–45.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Demakakos P, Marmot M, Steptoe A. Socioeconomic position and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the ELSA study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(5):367–78.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Demakakos P, Nazroo J, Breeze E, Marmot M. Socioeconomic status and health: the role of subjective social status. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(2):330–40.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Frerichs L, Huang TT, Chen DR. Associations of subjective social status with physical activity and body mass index across four Asian countries. J Obes. 2014;2014:710602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Manuck SB, Phillips JE, Gianaros PJ, Flory JD, Muldoon MF. Subjective socioeconomic status and presence of the metabolic syndrome in midlife community volunteers. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(1):35–45.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Singh-Manoux A, Adler NE, Marmot MG. Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(6):1321–33.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Woo J, Lynn H, Leung J, Wong SY. Self-perceived social status and health in older Hong Kong Chinese women compared with men. Women Health. 2008;48(2):209–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Tang KL, Rashid R, Godley J, Ghali WA. Association between subjective social status and cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e010137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Shanmugasegaram S, Oh P, Reid RD, McCumber T, Grace SL. Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Tsui CK, Shanmugasegaram S, Jamnik V, Wu G, Grace SL. Variation in patient perceptions of healthcare provider endorsement of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehab Prev. 2012;32(4):192–7.CrossRef
21.
Das S, O'Keefe JH. Behavioral cardiology: recognizing and addressing the profound impact of psychosocial stress on cardiovascular health. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2006;8(2):111–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Gage-Bouchard EA, Devine KA. Examining parents’ assessments of objective and subjective social status in families of children with cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Uphoff EP, Pickett KE, Cabieses B, Small N, Wright J. A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
Pilote L, Karp I. GENESIS-PRAXY (GENdEr and sex determInantS of cardiovascular disease: from bench to beyond-premature acute coronary SYndrome). Am Heart J. 2012;163(5):741–6. e742CrossRefPubMed
26.
Giatti L, do Valle Camelo L, de Castro Rodrigues JF, Barreto SM. Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status-Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1096.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Nobles J, Weintraub MR, Adler NE. Subjective socioeconomic status and health: relationships reconsidered. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2013;82:58–66.CrossRef
28.
Schnittker J, McLeod JD. The social psychology of health disparities. Ann Rev Sociol. 2005:75–103.
29.
Taylor SE, Seeman TE. Psychosocial resources and the SES-health relationship. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:210–25.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):586–92.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Cooper DC, Milic MS, Mills PJ, Bardwell WA, Ziegler MG, Dimsdale JE. Endothelial function: the impact of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on flow-mediated dilation. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39(3):222–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Euteneuer F, Mills PJ, Rief W, Ziegler MG, Dimsdale JE. Subjective social status predicts in vivo responsiveness of beta-adrenergic receptors. Health Psychol. 2012;31(4):525–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Gruenewald TL, Kemeny ME, Aziz N. Subjective social status moderates cortisol responses to social threat. Brain Behav Immunity. 2006;20(4):410–9.CrossRef
34.
35.
36.
37.
Gage E. Abstract B20: examining measures of socioeconomic status for cancer disparities research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(10 Supplement):B20.CrossRef
38.
Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(11):712–22.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Vest JR, Gamm LD, Oxford BA, Gonzalez MI, Slawson KM. Determinants of preventable readmissions in the United States: a systematic review. Implementation Sci: IS. 2010;5:88.CrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An exploration of the subjective social status construct in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Authors
Karen L. Tang
Louise Pilote
Hassan Behlouli
Jenny Godley
William A. Ghali
for the GENESIS-PRAXY investigators
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2261
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0759-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Catheter ablation for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Research article

Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment

Research article

Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds

Research article

Association of sodium intake and major cardiovascular outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Research article

Better clinical outcome with direct oral anticoagulants in hospitalized heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation

Correspondence

Oral anticoagulation in high risk Takotsubo syndrome: when should it be considered and when not?