Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Methodology

A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke

Authors: Lucia Simo, Lior Botzer, Claude Ghez, Robert A Scheidt

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proprioception plays important roles in planning and control of limb posture and movement. The impact of proprioceptive deficits on motor function post-stroke has been difficult to elucidate due to limitations in current tests of arm proprioception. Common clinical tests only provide ordinal assessment of proprioceptive integrity (eg. intact, impaired or absent). We introduce a standardized, quantitative method for evaluating proprioception within the arm on a continuous, ratio scale. We demonstrate the approach, which is based on signal detection theory of sensory psychophysics, in two tasks used to characterize motor function after stroke.

Methods

Hemiparetic stroke survivors and neurologically intact participants attempted to detect displacement- or force-perturbations robotically applied to their arm in a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice test. A logistic psychometric function parameterized detection of limb perturbations. The shape of this function is determined by two parameters: one corresponds to a signal detection threshold and the other to variability of responses about that threshold. These two parameters define a space in which proprioceptive sensation post-stroke can be compared to that of neurologically-intact people. We used an auditory tone discrimination task to control for potential comprehension, attention and memory deficits.

Results

All but one stroke survivor demonstrated competence in performing two-alternative discrimination in the auditory training test. For the remaining stroke survivors, those with clinically identified proprioceptive deficits in the hemiparetic arm or hand had higher detection thresholds and exhibited greater response variability than individuals without proprioceptive deficits. We then identified a normative parameter space determined by the threshold and response variability data collected from neurologically intact participants. By plotting displacement detection performance within this normative space, stroke survivors with and without intact proprioception could be discriminated on a continuous scale that was sensitive to small performance variations, e.g. practice effects across days.

Conclusions

The proposed method uses robotic perturbations similar to those used in ongoing studies of motor function post-stroke. The approach is sensitive to small changes in the proprioceptive detection of hand motions. We expect this new robotic assessment will empower future studies to characterize how proprioceptive deficits compromise limb posture and movement control in stroke survivors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carey LM: Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1995, 7: 51-95.CrossRef Carey LM: Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1995, 7: 51-95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA: Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22: 758-767. 10.1177/0269215508090674CrossRefPubMed Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA: Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22: 758-767. 10.1177/0269215508090674CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Carey LM, Matyas TA: Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43: 257-263. 10.2340/16501977-0662CrossRefPubMed Carey LM, Matyas TA: Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43: 257-263. 10.2340/16501977-0662CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Prochazka A: Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In Handbook of Physiology. Section12. New York: Oxford; 1996:89-127. Prochazka A: Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In Handbook of Physiology. Section12. New York: Oxford; 1996:89-127.
5.
go back to reference Dizio P, Lackner JR: Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84: 2175-2180.PubMed Dizio P, Lackner JR: Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84: 2175-2180.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C: Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 1995, 73: 820-835.PubMed Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C: Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 1995, 73: 820-835.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL: The roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of reaching movements. Prog Mot Contr 2009, 629: 317-335. 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_16CrossRef Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL: The roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of reaching movements. Prog Mot Contr 2009, 629: 317-335. 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_16CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sober S, Sabes P: Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 6982-6992.PubMed Sober S, Sabes P: Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 2003, 23: 6982-6992.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Suminski AJ, Rao SM, Mosier KM, Scheidt RA: Neural and electromyographic correlates of wrist posture control. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97: 1527-1545.CrossRefPubMed Suminski AJ, Rao SM, Mosier KM, Scheidt RA: Neural and electromyographic correlates of wrist posture control. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97: 1527-1545.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T: Reach and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97: 2824-2836. 10.1152/jn.00870.2006CrossRefPubMed Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T: Reach and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97: 2824-2836. 10.1152/jn.00870.2006CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dellon AL, Mackinon SE, Crosby PM: Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. J Hand Surg [Am] 1987, 12: 693-696. 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80049-7CrossRef Dellon AL, Mackinon SE, Crosby PM: Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. J Hand Surg [Am] 1987, 12: 693-696. 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80049-7CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P: The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil 1991, 5: 272-282.CrossRef Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P: The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil 1991, 5: 272-282.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA: Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1998, 84: 358-365. 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-XCrossRef Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA: Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1998, 84: 358-365. 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-XCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA: Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996, 77: 1271-1278. 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90192-6CrossRefPubMed Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA: Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996, 77: 1271-1278. 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90192-6CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE: Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and writs position sense in patients affected by stroke: comparison of clinical and new quantitative measure. J Hand Ther 2002, 15: 71-82. 10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.01571CrossRefPubMed Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE: Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and writs position sense in patients affected by stroke: comparison of clinical and new quantitative measure. J Hand Ther 2002, 15: 71-82. 10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.01571CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT: The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil 2002, 16: 523-533. 10.1191/0269215502cr522oaCrossRefPubMed Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT: The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil 2002, 16: 523-533. 10.1191/0269215502cr522oaCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH: Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 24: 178-187.CrossRefPubMed Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH: Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 24: 178-187.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Squeri V, Zenzari J, Morasso P, Basteris A, Giannoni P: Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients. 2011. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1-6), IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975500CrossRef Squeri V, Zenzari J, Morasso P, Basteris A, Giannoni P: Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients. 2011. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1-6), IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975500CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Janssen TW: Relationship among shoulder proprioception, kinematics, and pain after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90: 1557-1564. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.004CrossRefPubMed Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Janssen TW: Relationship among shoulder proprioception, kinematics, and pain after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90: 1557-1564. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.004CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Leibowitz N, Levy N, Weingarten S, Grinberg Y, Karniel A, Sacher Y, Serfaty C, Soroker N: Automated measurement of proprioception following stroke. Disabil Rehab 2008, 30: 1829-1836. 10.1080/09638280701640145CrossRef Leibowitz N, Levy N, Weingarten S, Grinberg Y, Karniel A, Sacher Y, Serfaty C, Soroker N: Automated measurement of proprioception following stroke. Disabil Rehab 2008, 30: 1829-1836. 10.1080/09638280701640145CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Scheidt RA, Lillis KP, Emerson SJ: Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching. Exp Brain Res 2010, 204: 239-254. 10.1007/s00221-010-2308-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scheidt RA, Lillis KP, Emerson SJ: Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching. Exp Brain Res 2010, 204: 239-254. 10.1007/s00221-010-2308-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S: The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 1975, 7: 13-31. Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S: The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 1975, 7: 13-31.
24.
go back to reference Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Thach WT, Bastian AJ: How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits with chronic hemiparesis? Brain 2004, 127: 1035-1046. 10.1093/brain/awh116CrossRefPubMed Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Thach WT, Bastian AJ: How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits with chronic hemiparesis? Brain 2004, 127: 1035-1046. 10.1093/brain/awh116CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference DeGowin EL, DeGowin RL: DeGowin & DeGowin’s bedside diagnostic examination. 5th edition. New York, NY: Collier Macmillan Ltd; 1987. DeGowin EL, DeGowin RL: DeGowin & DeGowin’s bedside diagnostic examination. 5th edition. New York, NY: Collier Macmillan Ltd; 1987.
26.
go back to reference Epstein O, Perkin GD, Cookson J, de Bono DP: Clinical examination. London: Mosby; 2004. Epstein O, Perkin GD, Cookson J, de Bono DP: Clinical examination. London: Mosby; 2004.
27.
go back to reference Julkunen L, Tenovou O, Jaaskelainen SK, Hamalainen H: Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2005, 111: 366-372. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00393.xCrossRefPubMed Julkunen L, Tenovou O, Jaaskelainen SK, Hamalainen H: Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2005, 111: 366-372. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00393.xCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA: Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84: 853-862.PubMed Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA: Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84: 853-862.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Gescheider GA: Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Mahwah New Jersey; 1997. Gescheider GA: Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Mahwah New Jersey; 1997.
30.
go back to reference Wickens TD: Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. Wickens TD: Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
31.
go back to reference Carey LM: Loss of somatic sensation. In Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Volume 2. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:231-247.CrossRef Carey LM: Loss of somatic sensation. In Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Volume 2. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006:231-247.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH: The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. J NeuroEng Rehab 2012, 9: 72. 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72CrossRef Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH: The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. J NeuroEng Rehab 2012, 9: 72. 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lin JH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL: Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients. Clinical Rehab 2004, 18: 391-397. 10.1191/0269215504cr737oaCrossRef Lin JH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL: Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients. Clinical Rehab 2004, 18: 391-397. 10.1191/0269215504cr737oaCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Veeger DH, Janssen TW: Kinematic alterations in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84: 97-105. 10.1097/01.PHM.0000150792.26793.E9CrossRefPubMed Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Veeger DH, Janssen TW: Kinematic alterations in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84: 97-105. 10.1097/01.PHM.0000150792.26793.E9CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, van Dieen J, Janssen TW: Proprioception of the shoulder after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89: 333-338. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.157CrossRefPubMed Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, van Dieen J, Janssen TW: Proprioception of the shoulder after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89: 333-338. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.157CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Stoeckmann T, Sullivan K, Scheidt RA: Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on post-stroke muscle recruitment and cocontraction during reaching: A pilot study. Phys Ther 2009, 89: 1-14. 10.2522/ptj.20070306.icCrossRef Stoeckmann T, Sullivan K, Scheidt RA: Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on post-stroke muscle recruitment and cocontraction during reaching: A pilot study. Phys Ther 2009, 89: 1-14. 10.2522/ptj.20070306.icCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C: Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 1993, 70: 2136-2147.PubMed Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C: Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 1993, 70: 2136-2147.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Ghez C, Sainburg R: Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1995, 73: 273-284. 10.1139/y95-038CrossRefPubMed Ghez C, Sainburg R: Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1995, 73: 273-284. 10.1139/y95-038CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE: Dependent of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J Neurophysiol 1981, 46: 143-166.PubMed Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE: Dependent of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J Neurophysiol 1981, 46: 143-166.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Prochazka A, Gorassini M: Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J Physiol 1998, 507: 277-291. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.277bu.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prochazka A, Gorassini M: Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J Physiol 1998, 507: 277-291. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.277bu.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A: Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. Stroke 2001, 32: 1635-1639. 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635CrossRefPubMed Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A: Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. Stroke 2001, 32: 1635-1639. 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K: Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005, 36: 2493-2496. 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2eCrossRefPubMed Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K: Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005, 36: 2493-2496. 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2eCrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu W-H, Gerloff C, Cohen LG: Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005, 128: 490-499. 10.1093/brain/awh369CrossRefPubMed Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu W-H, Gerloff C, Cohen LG: Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005, 128: 490-499. 10.1093/brain/awh369CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG: Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87: 351-357. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.019CrossRefPubMed Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG: Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87: 351-357. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.019CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Mrotek LA, Stoeckmann T, Bengtson M, Ghez C, Scheidt RA: Deficits of sensorimotor control and their impact on limb stabilization post-stroke: a case series. Translational and computational Motor Control (TCMC). Am Soc NeuroRehabil 2013, P8: 1-2. Mrotek LA, Stoeckmann T, Bengtson M, Ghez C, Scheidt RA: Deficits of sensorimotor control and their impact on limb stabilization post-stroke: a case series. Translational and computational Motor Control (TCMC). Am Soc NeuroRehabil 2013, P8: 1-2.
46.
go back to reference Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-Y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ: Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991, 38: 1-16. 10.1109/10.68204CrossRefPubMed Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-Y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ: Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991, 38: 1-16. 10.1109/10.68204CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Conrad M, Scheidt RA, Schmit BD: Effects of wrist tendon vibration on targeted upper arm movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2010, 25: 61-70.CrossRef Conrad M, Scheidt RA, Schmit BD: Effects of wrist tendon vibration on targeted upper arm movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2010, 25: 61-70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke
Authors
Lucia Simo
Lior Botzer
Claude Ghez
Robert A Scheidt
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-77

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2014 Go to the issue