Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study

Authors: Goedele Paternot, Alex M Wetzels, Fabienne Thonon, Anne Vansteenbrugge, Dorien Willemen, Johanna Devroe, Sophie Debrock, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Carl Spiessens

Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Quality control programs are necessary to maintain good clinical practice. Embryo grading has been described as one of the external quality assurance schemes. Although the evaluation of embryos is based on the assessment of morphological characteristics, considerable intra- and inter-observer variability has been described. In this multicentre study, the variability in the embryo evaluation has been evaluated using morphological characteristics on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of embryo development.

Methods

Five embryologists of four different IVF centers participated in this study. Multilevel images of embryos were presented on a website at different time points to evaluate intra-and inter-observer agreement in the assessment of embryo morphology. The embryos were evaluated on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of their development and each embryologist had to decide if the embryo had to be transferred, cryopreserved or discarded.

Results

Both intra-observer agreement and inter-observer agreement were good to excellent for the position of the pronuclei on day 1, the number of blastomeres on day 2 and day 3 and the clinical decision (transfer, cryopreservation, discard). For all other characteristics (size of pronuclei, presence of cytoplasomic halo, degree of fragmentation and size of blastomeres) the intra- and inter-observer agreement was moderate to very poor.

Conclusions

Mono- or multicentre quality control on embryo scoring by morphological assessment can easily be performed through the design of a simple website. In the future the website design can be adapted to generate statistical feedback upon scoring and can even include a training module.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matson P: Internal quality control and external quality assurance in the IVF laboratory. Hum Reprod. 1998, 13: 156-165.CrossRefPubMed Matson P: Internal quality control and external quality assurance in the IVF laboratory. Hum Reprod. 1998, 13: 156-165.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Gabowski W: Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol. 2004, 4: 5-22.PubMed Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Gabowski W: Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol. 2004, 4: 5-22.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Wininger D, Gibbons W, Conaghan J, Stern JE: Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010, 27: 437-439. 10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Wininger D, Gibbons W, Conaghan J, Stern JE: Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010, 27: 437-439. 10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Racowsky C, Stern JE, Gibbons WE, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Biggers JD: National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere symmetry and live birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2011, 95: 1985-1989. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.009.CrossRefPubMed Racowsky C, Stern JE, Gibbons WE, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Biggers JD: National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere symmetry and live birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2011, 95: 1985-1989. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.009.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Sharon KS, Catherino WH: Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86: 1608-1615. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037.CrossRefPubMed Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Sharon KS, Catherino WH: Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86: 1608-1615. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Paternot G, Debrock S, D'Hooghe TM, Spiessens C: Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009, 7: 105-10.1186/1477-7827-7-105.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Paternot G, Debrock S, D'Hooghe TM, Spiessens C: Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009, 7: 105-10.1186/1477-7827-7-105.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference De Assin R, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Ramirez JP, Zamora S, Fernandez A, Martinez L, Castilla JA: Comparison of methods to determine the assigned value in an external quality control programme for embryo evaluation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009, 19: 824-829. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.026.CrossRef De Assin R, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Ramirez JP, Zamora S, Fernandez A, Martinez L, Castilla JA: Comparison of methods to determine the assigned value in an external quality control programme for embryo evaluation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009, 19: 824-829. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.026.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Castilla JA, de Assin RR, Gonzalvo MC, Calvero A, Ramirez JP, Vergara F, Martinez L: External quality control for embryology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010, 20: 68-74. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033.CrossRefPubMed Castilla JA, de Assin RR, Gonzalvo MC, Calvero A, Ramirez JP, Vergara F, Martinez L: External quality control for embryology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010, 20: 68-74. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.033.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Arce JC, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Janssens R, Helmgaard L, Sorensen P: Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21: 2141-2148. 10.1093/humrep/del106.CrossRefPubMed Arce JC, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Janssens R, Helmgaard L, Sorensen P: Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21: 2141-2148. 10.1093/humrep/del106.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, Peeraer K, Vanneste E, Meeuwis L, Meuleman C, Frijns JP, Vermeersch JR, D'Hooghe TM: Pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2010, 93: 364-373. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.072.CrossRefPubMed Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, Peeraer K, Vanneste E, Meeuwis L, Meuleman C, Frijns JP, Vermeersch JR, D'Hooghe TM: Pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2010, 93: 364-373. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.072.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Viera AJ, Garrett JM: Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistics. Fam Med. 2005, 37: 360-363.PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM: Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistics. Fam Med. 2005, 37: 360-363.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Landis JR: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977, 31: 159-174.CrossRef Landis JR: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977, 31: 159-174.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chicchetti DV: Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some basic issues. Br J Psychiatry. 1976, 129: 452-456. 10.1192/bjp.129.5.452.CrossRef Chicchetti DV: Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some basic issues. Br J Psychiatry. 1976, 129: 452-456. 10.1192/bjp.129.5.452.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study
Authors
Goedele Paternot
Alex M Wetzels
Fabienne Thonon
Anne Vansteenbrugge
Dorien Willemen
Johanna Devroe
Sophie Debrock
Thomas M D'Hooghe
Carl Spiessens
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-127

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2011 Go to the issue