Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research

Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos

Authors: Goedele Paternot, Johanna Devroe, Sophie Debrock, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Carl Spiessens

Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability in the evaluation of embryo quality. Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using different morphological parameters.

Methods

Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using a standard scoring system. The kappa coefficient was calculated to measure intra- and inter-observer variability before and after training sessions.

Results

Good to excellent intra-observer agreement was present for most parameters exceptions being scoring the position of pronuclei and the presence of a cytoplasmic halo on day 1, multinucleation on day 2 and the size of fragments on day 3. Inter-observer agreement was only good to excellent for the number of blastomeres on day 2 and day 3 and the orientation of the cleavage axes on day 2. Training sessions had a positive impact on inter-observer agreement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, assessment of morphological characteristics of early stage embryos using multilevel images was marked by a high intra-observer and a moderate inter-observer agreement. Training sessions were useful to increase inter-observer agreement.
Literature
1.
Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Glabowski W: Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol. 2004, 4: 5-22.PubMed
2.
Fisch JD, Rodriguez H, Ross R, Overby G, Sher G: The graduated embryo score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2001, 16: 1970-1975. 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1970.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Desai N, Goldstein J, Rowland D, Goldfarb JM: Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 2000, 15: 2190-2196. 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2190.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, Bergh T: Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007, 22: 548-557. 10.1093/humrep/del403.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Altman DG, Royston P: What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?. Stat Med. 2000, 19: 453-473. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Mol BW, Lijmer JG, Evers JL, Bossuyt PM: Characteristics of good diagnostic studies. Semin Reprod Med. 2003, 21: 17-25. 10.1055/s-2003-39991.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Roux C, Joanne C, Agnani G, Fromm M, Clavequin MC, Bresson JL: Morphometric parameters of living human in-vitro fertilization embryos: importance of asynchronous division process. Hum Reprod. 1995, 10: 1201-1207.PubMed
8.
Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Shipley SK, Catherino WH: Interobserver and intra-observer variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86: 1608-1615. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Arce JC, Ziebe S, Lundin K, Janssens R, Helmgaard L, Sorensen P: Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21: 2141-2148. 10.1093/humrep/del106.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Landis JR: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977, 3: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRef
11.
Chicchetti DV: Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some basic issues. Br J Psychiatry. 1976, 129: 452-456. 10.1192/bjp.129.5.452.CrossRef
12.
Van Soom A, Ysebaert MT, Vanhoucke-De Medts A, Velde Van de A, Merton S, Delval A, Van Langendonckt A, Donnay I, Vanroose G, Bols PE, de Kuif A: Sucrose-induced shrinkage of in vitro produced bovine morulae: effect on viability, morphology and ease of evaluation. Theriogenology. 1996, 46: 1131-1147. 10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00285-3.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos
Authors
Goedele Paternot
Johanna Devroe
Sophie Debrock
Thomas M D'Hooghe
Carl Spiessens
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-105

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2009 Go to the issue

Research

Lateralization of the connections of the ovary to the celiac ganglia in juvenile rats

Research

Binding characteristics of the ovine membrane progesterone receptor alpha and expression of the receptor during the estrous cycle

Research

A retrospective study on IVF outcome in euthyroid patients with anti-thyroid antibodies: effects of levothyroxine, acetyl-salicylic acid and prednisolone adjuvant treatments

Research

Kit ligand promotes first polar body extrusion of mouse preovulatory oocytes

Research

Predicting lung maturity in preterm rupture of membranes via lamellar bodies count from a vaginal pool: a cohort study

Research

A comparison of menotropin, highly-purified menotropin and follitropin alfa in cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection