Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research

Development and validation of the Brazilian version of the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ): An example of merging classical psychometric theory and the Rasch measurement model

Authors: Eduardo Chachamovich, Marcelo P Fleck, Clarissa M Trentini, Ken Laidlaw, Mick J Power

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Aging has determined a demographic shift in the world, which is considered a major societal achievement, and a challenge. Aging is primarily a subjective experience, shaped by factors such as gender and culture. There is a lack of instruments to assess attitudes to aging adequately. In addition, there is no instrument developed or validated in developing region contexts, so that the particularities of ageing in these areas are not included in the measures available. This paper aims to develop and validate a reliable attitude to aging instrument by combining classical psychometric approach and Rasch analysis.

Methods

Pilot study and field trial are described in details. Statistical analysis included classic psychometric theory (EFA and CFA) and Rasch measurement model. The latter was applied to examine unidimensionality, response scale and item fit.

Results

Sample was composed of 424 Brazilian old adults, which was compared to an international sample (n = 5238). The final instrument shows excellent psychometric performance (discriminant validity, confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch fit statistics). Rasch analysis indicated that modifications in the response scale and item deletions improved the initial solution derived from the classic approach.

Conclusion

The combination of classic and modern psychometric theories in a complementary way is fruitful for development and validation of instruments. The construction of a reliable Brazilian Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire is important for assessing cultural specificities of aging in a transcultural perspective and can be applied in international cross-cultural investigations running less risk of cultural bias.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kinsella K, Velkoff VA: US Census Bureau, Series P95/01–1, An Aging World: 2001. Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 2001. Kinsella K, Velkoff VA: US Census Bureau, Series P95/01–1, An Aging World: 2001. Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 2001.
2.
go back to reference United Nations: World Population Ageing: 1950–2050. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York: United Nations Publications; 2001. United Nations: World Population Ageing: 1950–2050. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York: United Nations Publications; 2001.
3.
go back to reference US Census Bureau: International Population Reports WP/02, Global Population Profile: 2002. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; 2004. US Census Bureau: International Population Reports WP/02, Global Population Profile: 2002. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; 2004.
4.
go back to reference United Nations: World Population Prospects: The 2002 revision. United Nations Population Division; New York 2003. United Nations: World Population Prospects: The 2002 revision. United Nations Population Division; New York 2003.
5.
go back to reference WHO: Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organisation Geneva 2002. WHO: Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organisation Geneva 2002.
6.
go back to reference WHO: Ageing: Exploding the Myths. World Health Organisation Geneva 1999. WHO: Ageing: Exploding the Myths. World Health Organisation Geneva 1999.
7.
go back to reference Baltes , Smith : New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging to the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003, 49(2):123–35. 10.1159/000067946CrossRefPubMed Baltes , Smith : New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging to the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003, 49(2):123–35. 10.1159/000067946CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Levy Br, Slade MD, Kunkel SR, Kasl SV: Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002, 83(2):261–270. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261CrossRefPubMed Levy Br, Slade MD, Kunkel SR, Kasl SV: Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002, 83(2):261–270. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Knight BG: Psychotherapy with Older adults. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. Knight BG: Psychotherapy with Older adults. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.
10.
go back to reference Ebner NC, Freund AM, Baltes PB: Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging 2006, 21: 664–678. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664CrossRefPubMed Ebner NC, Freund AM, Baltes PB: Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging 2006, 21: 664–678. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Boduroglu A, Yoon C, Luo T, Park DC: Age-related stereotypes: A comparison af American and Chinese cultures. Gerontology 2006, 52: 324–333. 10.1159/000094614CrossRefPubMed Boduroglu A, Yoon C, Luo T, Park DC: Age-related stereotypes: A comparison af American and Chinese cultures. Gerontology 2006, 52: 324–333. 10.1159/000094614CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bowling A, Dieppe P: What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ 2005, 331: 1458–1551. 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1548CrossRef Bowling A, Dieppe P: What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ 2005, 331: 1458–1551. 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1548CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Laidlaw K, Power MJ, Schmidt S, the WHOQOL Group: The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): Development and psychometric properties. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007, 22: 367–379. 10.1002/gps.1683CrossRefPubMed Laidlaw K, Power MJ, Schmidt S, the WHOQOL Group: The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): Development and psychometric properties. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007, 22: 367–379. 10.1002/gps.1683CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Power M, Aaronson NK, Cella DF, Anderson RT: Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In Quality of life and pharmacoeonomics in clinical trials. Edited by: Spilker B. Hagerstown, MD. Lippincott-Raven; 1996:659–668. Bullinger M, Power M, Aaronson NK, Cella DF, Anderson RT: Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In Quality of life and pharmacoeonomics in clinical trials. Edited by: Spilker B. Hagerstown, MD. Lippincott-Raven; 1996:659–668.
16.
go back to reference The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–85. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–85. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef
17.
go back to reference The WHOQOL Group: Development of The World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558. 10.1017/S0033291798006667CrossRef The WHOQOL Group: Development of The World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558. 10.1017/S0033291798006667CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Power MJ, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14(10):2197–214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9CrossRefPubMed Power MJ, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14(10):2197–214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini C: Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Rev Saude Publica 2006, 40(5):785–91.CrossRefPubMed Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini C: Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Rev Saude Publica 2006, 40(5):785–91.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pallant J, Tennant A: An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007, 46: 1–18. 10.1348/014466506X96931CrossRefPubMed Pallant J, Tennant A: An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007, 46: 1–18. 10.1348/014466506X96931CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sheik JI, Yesavage JA: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986, 37: 819–820. Sheik JI, Yesavage JA: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986, 37: 819–820.
22.
go back to reference Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G: RUMM 2020. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2003. Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G: RUMM 2020. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2003.
23.
go back to reference Field A: Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 2nd edition. SAGE, London; 2005. Field A: Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 2nd edition. SAGE, London; 2005.
24.
go back to reference Kauffman JD, Dunlap WP: Determining the number of factors to retain: a Widows-based FORTRAN-ISL program for parallel analysis. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000, 32(3):389–95.CrossRef Kauffman JD, Dunlap WP: Determining the number of factors to retain: a Widows-based FORTRAN-ISL program for parallel analysis. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000, 32(3):389–95.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zwick WR, Velicer WF: Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bulletin 1986, 99: 432–442. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432CrossRef Zwick WR, Velicer WF: Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bulletin 1986, 99: 432–442. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432CrossRef
26.
go back to reference O'Connor BP: SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP tests. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000, 32(3):396–402.CrossRefPubMed O'Connor BP: SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP tests. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000, 32(3):396–402.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hays RD, Hayashi T, Carson S, Ware JE: User's guide for the Multitrait Analysis Program (MAP). Santa Monica, CA. The Rand Corporation, N-2786-RC 1988. Hays RD, Hayashi T, Carson S, Ware JE: User's guide for the Multitrait Analysis Program (MAP). Santa Monica, CA. The Rand Corporation, N-2786-RC 1988.
28.
go back to reference Arbuckle JA: Amos 6.0 User's Guide. In Amos Development Corporation. Spring House, PA, USA; 2005. Arbuckle JA: Amos 6.0 User's Guide. In Amos Development Corporation. Spring House, PA, USA; 2005.
29.
go back to reference Andrich D: Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978, 43: 561–573. 10.1007/BF02293814CrossRef Andrich D: Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978, 43: 561–573. 10.1007/BF02293814CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gutman L: The basis of scalogram analysis. In Measurement and prediction. Edited by: Stouffer SA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1950. Gutman L: The basis of scalogram analysis. In Measurement and prediction. Edited by: Stouffer SA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1950.
31.
go back to reference Smith EV Jr: Detecting and evaluation of the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Appl Meas 2002, 3(2):205–231. Smith EV Jr: Detecting and evaluation of the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Appl Meas 2002, 3(2):205–231.
33.
go back to reference Guillemin F: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Reumathol 1995, 24(2):61–3. 10.3109/03009749509099285CrossRef Guillemin F: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Reumathol 1995, 24(2):61–3. 10.3109/03009749509099285CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of the Brazilian version of the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ): An example of merging classical psychometric theory and the Rasch measurement model
Authors
Eduardo Chachamovich
Marcelo P Fleck
Clarissa M Trentini
Ken Laidlaw
Mick J Power
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2008 Go to the issue