Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology and Therapy 3/2024

Open Access 06-03-2024 | Secukinumab | Brief Report

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Authors: Philip J. Mease, Richard B. Warren, Peter Nash, Jean-Marie Grouin, Nikos Lyris, Damon Willems, Vanessa Taieb, Jason Eells, Iain B. McInnes

Published in: Rheumatology and Therapy | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were used to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab and secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg at 52 weeks for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve (bDMARD-naïve) or with previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).

Methods

Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from bimekizumab randomized controlled trials, BE OPTIMAL (N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (N = 267), were matched to aggregate data from bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patient subgroups from FUTURE 2 using secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg doses (bDMARD-naïve: N = 63/37; TNFi-IR: N = 67/33). To adjust for cross-trial differences, patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of patients in the secukinumab trials. Unanchored comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and secukinumab 52-week non-responder imputation outcomes for 20/50/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20/50/70) and minimal disease activity (MDA) index were analyzed.

Results

In patients who were bDMARD-naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of ACR70 response than secukinumab 150 mg (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.39 [1.26, 4.53]; p = 0.008) and secukinumab 300 mg (2.03 [1.11, 3.72]; p = 0.021) at 52 weeks. In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response compared to secukinumab 150 mg for ACR20 (3.50 [1.64–7.49]; p = 0.001), ACR50 (3.32 [1.41, 7.80]; p = 0.006), ACR70 (2.95 [1.08, 8.07]; p = 0.035) and MDA (3.52 [1.38, 8.99]; p = 0.009), and a greater likelihood of response compared to secukinumab 300 mg for ACR50 (2.44 [1.06, 5.65]; p = 0.037) and MDA (2.92 [1.20, 7.09]; p = 0.018) at 52 weeks.

Conclusion

In this MAIC analysis, the efficacy of bimekizumab, as demonstrated by the likelihood of ACR20/50/70 and MDA response at 52 weeks, was greater or comparable to secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg for patients with PsA who were bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR.

Trial Registration Numbers

NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT04009499, NCT01752634, NCT01989468, NCT02294227, NCT02404350.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Papp KA, et al. Prevalence of rheumatologist-diagnosed psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(5):729–35.CrossRefPubMed Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Papp KA, et al. Prevalence of rheumatologist-diagnosed psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(5):729–35.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab inhibition of interleukin-17A in patients with psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1329–39.CrossRefPubMed Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab inhibition of interleukin-17A in patients with psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1329–39.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, et al. Efficacy of subcutaneous secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: results from the randomized placebo-controlled FUTURE 2 study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(9):1713–7.CrossRefPubMed Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, et al. Efficacy of subcutaneous secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: results from the randomized placebo-controlled FUTURE 2 study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(9):1713–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nash P, Mease PJ, McInnes IB, et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab administration by autoinjector in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (FUTURE 3). Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nash P, Mease PJ, McInnes IB, et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab administration by autoinjector in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (FUTURE 3). Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kivitz AJ, Nash P, Tahir H, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with or without loading regimen in psoriatic arthritis: results from the FUTURE 4 study. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(3):393–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kivitz AJ, Nash P, Tahir H, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with or without loading regimen in psoriatic arthritis: results from the FUTURE 4 study. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(3):393–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference van der Heijde D, Mease PJ, Landewe RBM, et al. Secukinumab provides sustained low rates of radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from a phase 3 study, FUTURE 5. Rheumatology (Oxf). 2020;59(6):1325–34.CrossRef van der Heijde D, Mease PJ, Landewe RBM, et al. Secukinumab provides sustained low rates of radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from a phase 3 study, FUTURE 5. Rheumatology (Oxf). 2020;59(6):1325–34.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ritchlin CT, Coates LC, McInnes IB, et al. Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(11):1404–14. Ritchlin CT, Coates LC, McInnes IB, et al. Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(11):1404–14.
9.
go back to reference Merola JF, Landewe R, McInnes IB, et al. Bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (BE COMPLETE). Lancet. 2023;401(10370):38–48.CrossRefPubMed Merola JF, Landewe R, McInnes IB, et al. Bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (BE COMPLETE). Lancet. 2023;401(10370):38–48.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Coates LC, Landewe R, McInnes I, Mease P, Ritchlin C, Tanaka Y. Sustained efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and prior inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the phase 3 BE COMPLETE study and its open-label extension up to 1 year EULAR. 2023. Coates LC, Landewe R, McInnes I, Mease P, Ritchlin C, Tanaka Y. Sustained efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and prior inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the phase 3 BE COMPLETE study and its open-label extension up to 1 year EULAR. 2023.
11.
go back to reference Reich K, Warren RB, Lebwohl M, et al. Bimekizumab versus secukinumab in plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142–52.CrossRefPubMed Reich K, Warren RB, Lebwohl M, et al. Bimekizumab versus secukinumab in plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142–52.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Mak. 2013;33(5):607–17.CrossRef Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Mak. 2013;33(5):607–17.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Phillippo DM, Ades AE, Dias S, Palmer S, Abrams KR, Welton NJ. Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in health technology appraisal. Med Decis Mak. 2018;38(2):200–11.CrossRef Phillippo DM, Ades AE, Dias S, Palmer S, Abrams KR, Welton NJ. Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in health technology appraisal. Med Decis Mak. 2018;38(2):200–11.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15(6):940–7.CrossRefPubMed Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15(6):940–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nash P, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, et al. Secukinumab versus adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis: comparative effectiveness up to 48 weeks using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2018;5(1):99–122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nash P, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, et al. Secukinumab versus adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis: comparative effectiveness up to 48 weeks using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2018;5(1):99–122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Strand V, McInnes I, Mease P, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison: secukinumab versus infliximab in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Comp Eff Res. 2019;8(7):497–510.CrossRefPubMed Strand V, McInnes I, Mease P, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison: secukinumab versus infliximab in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Comp Eff Res. 2019;8(7):497–510.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Song J, Abé C, Banefelt J, et al. Real-world usage of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with psoriatic arthritis in Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(Suppl 1):1785–6. Song J, Abé C, Banefelt J, et al. Real-world usage of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with psoriatic arthritis in Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(Suppl 1):1785–6.
21.
go back to reference Welby S, Song J, Lu C, et al. RWD174 real world treatment usage of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in US patients with psoriatic arthritis: persistence, factors associated with non-persistence, and dosing patterns. Value Health. 2023;26(6):S394–5.CrossRef Welby S, Song J, Lu C, et al. RWD174 real world treatment usage of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in US patients with psoriatic arthritis: persistence, factors associated with non-persistence, and dosing patterns. Value Health. 2023;26(6):S394–5.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Orbai AM, Husni ME, Gladman DD, et al. Secukinumab efficacy on psoriatic arthritis GRAPPA-OMERACT core domains in patients with or without prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(3):1223–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orbai AM, Husni ME, Gladman DD, et al. Secukinumab efficacy on psoriatic arthritis GRAPPA-OMERACT core domains in patients with or without prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(3):1223–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Tillett W, Eder L, Goel N, et al. Enhanced patient involvement and the need to revise the core set—report from the psoriatic arthritis working group at OMERACT 2014. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(11):2198–203.CrossRefPubMed Tillett W, Eder L, Goel N, et al. Enhanced patient involvement and the need to revise the core set—report from the psoriatic arthritis working group at OMERACT 2014. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(11):2198–203.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Coates LC, Soriano ER, Corp N, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(8):465–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coates LC, Soriano ER, Corp N, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(8):465–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Sanchez-Rodriguez G, Puig L. Pathogenic role of IL-17 and therapeutic targeting of IL-17F in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):10305. Sanchez-Rodriguez G, Puig L. Pathogenic role of IL-17 and therapeutic targeting of IL-17F in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):10305.
26.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Shaw S. Bimekizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2024;20(2):155–68. Tanaka Y, Shaw S. Bimekizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2024;20(2):155–68.
27.
go back to reference DeTora LM, Toroser D, Sykes A, et al. Good publication practice (GPP) guidelines for company-sponsored biomedical research: 2022 update. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(9):1298–304.CrossRefPubMed DeTora LM, Toroser D, Sykes A, et al. Good publication practice (GPP) guidelines for company-sponsored biomedical research: 2022 update. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(9):1298–304.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
Authors
Philip J. Mease
Richard B. Warren
Peter Nash
Jean-Marie Grouin
Nikos Lyris
Damon Willems
Vanessa Taieb
Jason Eells
Iain B. McInnes
Publication date
06-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Rheumatology and Therapy / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 2198-6576
Electronic ISSN: 2198-6584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Rheumatology and Therapy 3/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.