Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sports Medicine
Published in: Sports Medicine 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Systematic Review

Effects of Exercise on Bone Status in Female Subjects, from Young Girls to Postmenopausal Women: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Authors: Jincheng Xu, Giovanni Lombardi, Wei Jiao, Giuseppe Banfi

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis and postmenopausal bone loss pose a huge social and economic burden worldwide. Regular exercise and physical activity are effective interventions for maximizing or maintaining peak bone mass and preventing bone loss in the elderly; however, most recommendations are addressed to the general public and lack specific indications for girls and women, the segment of the population most at risk for developing osteoporosis.

Objective

The aim of this overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was to summarize current evidence for the effects of exercise and physical activity interventions on bone status in girls and women, and to explore whether specific exercise programs exist for improving or maintaining bone mass or bone strength in females.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2009, updated to 22 June 2015, using the following groups of search terms: (i) ‘physical activity’ and ‘exercise’; and (ii) ‘bone’, ‘bone health’, ‘bone strength’, ‘bone structure’, ‘bone metabolism’, ‘bone turnover’, and ‘bone biomarkers’. Searches and screening were limited to systematic reviews or meta-analyses of studies in females and published in English. Our final analysis included 12 articles that met the inclusion criteria.

Results

Combined-impact exercise protocols (impact exercise with resistance training) are the best choice to preserve/improve bone mineral density in pre- and postmenopausal women. Peak bone mass in young girls can be improved with short bouts of school-based high-impact plyometric exercise programs. Whole-body vibration exercises have no beneficial effects on bone in postmenopausal or elderly women.

Conclusions and Implications

Lifelong exercise, specific for age, is an effective way to sustain bone health in girls and women.
Literature
1.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
3.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273(5):402–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, et al. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1510–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2004.
7.
Karsenty G, Ferron M. The contribution of bone to whole-organism physiology. Nature. 2012;481(7381):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Banfi G, Lombardi G, Colombini A, et al. Bone metabolism markers in sports medicine. Sports Med. 2010;40(8):697–714.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Lombardi G, Perego S, Luzi L, et al. A four-season molecule: osteocalcin. Updates in its physiological roles. Endocrine. 2015;48(2):394–404.CrossRefPubMed
10.
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s gudie to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2014.
11.
Ishikawa S, Kim Y, Kang M, et al. Effects of weight-bearing exercise on bone health in girls: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2013;43(9):875–92.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Babatunde OO, Forsyth JJ, Gidlow CJ. A meta-analysis of brief high-impact exercises for enhancing bone health in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(1):109–19.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Effects of different impact exercise modalities on bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(3):251–67.
14.
Howe TE, Shea B, Dawson LJ, et al. Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD000333.
15.
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
16.
Kohrt WM, Bloomfield SA, Little KD, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1985–96.CrossRefPubMed
17.
National Institute of Health. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement. 2000;17(1):1–36.
18.
19.
20.
Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Seo HJ, Kim KU. Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Bielemann RM, Martinez-Mesa J, Gigante DP. Physical activity during life course and bone mass: a systematic review of methods and findings from cohort studies with young adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Polidoulis I, Beyene J, Cheung AM. The effect of exercise on pQCT parameters of bone structure and strength in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(1):39–51.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Marques EA, Mota J, Carvalho J. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Age. 2012;34(6):1493–515.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Kohrt WM. Effects of ground and joint reaction force exercise on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:177.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Lau RW, Liao LR, Yu F, et al. The effects of whole body vibration therapy on bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(11):975–88.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(12):898–908.
33.
Zhao R, Zhao M, Zhang L. Efficiency of jumping exercise in improving bone mineral density among premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(10):1393–402.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Nikander R, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, et al. Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Med. 2010;8:47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Turner CH, Robling AG. Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003;31(1):45–50.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Fonseca H, Moreira-Goncalves D, Coriolano HJ, et al. Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility. Sports Med. 2014;44(1):37–53.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Maimoun L, Sultan C. Effects of physical activity on bone remodeling. Metabolism. 2011;60(3):373–88.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of Exercise on Bone Status in Female Subjects, from Young Girls to Postmenopausal Women: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Authors
Jincheng Xu
Giovanni Lombardi
Wei Jiao
Giuseppe Banfi
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0494-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Sports Medicine 8/2016 Go to the issue

Review Article

Neuromuscular Risk Factors for Knee and Ankle Ligament Injuries in Male Youth Soccer Players

Letter to the Editor

Comment on: “Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study”

Current Opinion

Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy with Concurrent Exercise Training: Contrary Evidence for an Interference Effect

Systematic Review

Sport Injuries Sustained by Athletes with Disability: A Systematic Review

Review Article

The Great British Medalists Project: A Review of Current Knowledge on the Development of the World’s Best Sporting Talent

Review Article

Neck Muscular Strength, Training, Performance and Sport Injury Risk: A Review