Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Research Article

Adaptation, Acceptance and Adaptive Preferences in Health and Capability Well-Being Measurement Amongst Those Approaching End of Life

Authors: Joanna Coast, Cara Bailey, Rosanna Orlando, Kathy Armour, Rachel Perry, Louise Jones, Philip Kinghorn

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Adaptive preferences occur when people subconsciously alter their views to account for the possibilities available to them. Adaptive preferences may be problematic where these views are used in resource allocation decisions because they may lead to underestimation of the true benefits of providing services. This research explored the nature and extent of both adaptation (changing to better suit the context) and adaptive preferences (altering preferences in response to restricted options) in individuals approaching the end of life (EoL).

Methods

Qualitative data from ‘thinkaloud’ interviews with 33 hospice patients, 22 close persons and 17 health professionals were used alongside their responses to three health/well-being measures for use in resource allocation decisions: EQ-5D-5L (health status); ICECAP-A (adult capability); and ICECAP-SCM (Supportive Care Measure; EoL capability). Constant comparative analysis combined a focus on both verbalised perceptions across the three groups and responses to the measures.

Results

Data collection took place between October 2012 and February 2014. Informants spoke clearly about how patients had adapted their lives in response to symptoms associated with their terminal condition. It was often seen as a positive choice to accept their state and adapt in this way but, at the same time, most patients were fully aware of the health and capability losses that they had faced. Self-assessments of health and capability generally appeared to reflect the pre-adaptation state, although there were exceptions.

Conclusion

Despite adapting to their conditions, the reference group for individuals approaching EoL largely remained a healthy, capable population, and most did not show evidence of adaptive preferences.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coast J. Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: making a case for the capability approach. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(4):473–82.CrossRefPubMed Coast J. Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: making a case for the capability approach. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(4):473–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Clark DA. Adaptation, poverty and well-being: some issues and observations with special reference to the capability approach and development studies. J Hum Dev Capab. 2009;10(1):21–42.CrossRef Clark DA. Adaptation, poverty and well-being: some issues and observations with special reference to the capability approach and development studies. J Hum Dev Capab. 2009;10(1):21–42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Qizilbash M. Well-being, adaptation and human limitations. R Inst Phil Suppl. 2006;59:83–110.CrossRef Qizilbash M. Well-being, adaptation and human limitations. R Inst Phil Suppl. 2006;59:83–110.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Oort FJ, Visser MRM, Sprangers MAG. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(11):1126–37.CrossRefPubMed Oort FJ, Visser MRM, Sprangers MAG. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(11):1126–37.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982. Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.
6.
go back to reference Sen A. Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992. Sen A. Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992.
7.
8.
go back to reference Alkire S. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comin F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, editors. The capability approach: concepts, measures and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 26–50.CrossRef Alkire S. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comin F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, editors. The capability approach: concepts, measures and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 26–50.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sen A. Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics 2004;10:77–80CrossRef Sen A. Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics 2004;10:77–80CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–76.CrossRefPubMed Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–76.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sutton E, Coast J. Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care, using qualitative methods. Palliat Med. 2014;28:151–7.CrossRefPubMed Sutton E, Coast J. Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care, using qualitative methods. Palliat Med. 2014;28:151–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kinghorn P, Robinson A, Smith RD. Developing a capability-based questionnaire for assessing well-being in patients with chronic pain. Soc Indic Res. 2014;120:897–916.CrossRef Kinghorn P, Robinson A, Smith RD. Developing a capability-based questionnaire for assessing well-being in patients with chronic pain. Soc Indic Res. 2014;120:897–916.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Greco G, Skordis-Worrall J, Mkandawire B, Mills A. What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women’s quality of life in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:69–78.CrossRefPubMed Greco G, Skordis-Worrall J, Mkandawire B, Mills A. What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women’s quality of life in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:69–78.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lorgelly PK, Lorimer K, Fenwick EAL, Briggs AH, Anand P. Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: the development of the OCAP-18. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:68–81.CrossRefPubMed Lorgelly PK, Lorimer K, Fenwick EAL, Briggs AH, Anand P. Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: the development of the OCAP-18. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:68–81.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Simon J, Anand P, Gray A, Rugkasa J, Yeeles K, Burns T. Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Simon J, Anand P, Gray A, Rugkasa J, Yeeles K, Burns T. Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nussbaum MC. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ. 2003;9(2–3):33–59.CrossRef Nussbaum MC. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ. 2003;9(2–3):33–59.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ericsson K, Simon H. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:215–51.CrossRef Ericsson K, Simon H. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:215–51.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993. Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993.
21.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.CrossRef Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
23.
go back to reference Huynh E, Coast J, Rose J, Kinghorn P, Flynn T. Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:114–28.CrossRefPubMed Huynh E, Coast J, Rose J, Kinghorn P, Flynn T. Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:114–28.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–69.CrossRefPubMed Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–69.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1968. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1968.
29.
go back to reference Coast J, Jackson L. Understanding primary data analysis. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative methods for health economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2017. Coast J, Jackson L. Understanding primary data analysis. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative methods for health economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2017.
31.
go back to reference Campbell CL, Bailey C, Armour K, Perry R, Orlando R, Kinghorn P, et al. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients, close people and health professionals. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(7):324–32.CrossRef Campbell CL, Bailey C, Armour K, Perry R, Orlando R, Kinghorn P, et al. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients, close people and health professionals. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(7):324–32.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference National Audit Office. End of life care. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: The Stationery Office; 2008. National Audit Office. End of life care. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: The Stationery Office; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Adaptation, Acceptance and Adaptive Preferences in Health and Capability Well-Being Measurement Amongst Those Approaching End of Life
Authors
Joanna Coast
Cara Bailey
Rosanna Orlando
Kathy Armour
Rachel Perry
Louise Jones
Philip Kinghorn
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0310-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 5/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.