Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Research Article

Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research

Authors: James D. Harrison, Wendy G. Anderson, Maureen Fagan, Edmondo Robinson, Jeffrey Schnipper, Gina Symczak, Catherine Hanson, Martha B. Carnie, Jim Banta, Sherry Chen, Jonathan Duong, Celene Wong, Andrew D. Auerbach

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to describe barriers to patient and family advisory council (PFAC) member engagement in research and strategies to support engagement in this context.

Methods

We formed a study team comprising patient advisors, researchers, physicians, and nurses. We then undertook a qualitative study using focus groups and interviews. We invited PFAC members, PFAC leaders, hospital leaders, and researchers from nine academic medical centers that are part of a hospital medicine research network to participate. All participants were asked a standard set of questions exploring the study question. We used content analysis to analyze data.

Results

Eighty PFAC members and other stakeholders (45 patient/caregiver members of PFACs, 12 PFAC leaders, 12 hospital leaders, 11 researchers) participated in eight focus and 19 individual interviews. We identified ten barriers to PFAC member engagement in research. Codes were organized into three categories: (1) individual PFAC member reluctance; (2) lack of skills and training; and (3) problems connecting with the right person at the right time. We identified ten strategies to support engagement. These were organized into four categories: (1) creating an environment where the PFAC members are making a genuine and unique contribution; (2) building community between PFAC members and researchers; (3) best practice activities for researchers to facilitate engagement; and (4) tools and training.

Conclusion

Barriers to engaging PFAC members in research include patients’ negative perceptions of research and researchers’ lack of training. Building community between PFAC members and researchers is a foundation for partnerships. There are shared training opportunities for PFAC members and researchers to build skills about research and research engagement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Duffett L. Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017;150:113–20.CrossRefPubMed Duffett L. Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017;150:113–20.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fagan MB, Wong C, Morrison CRC, Lewis-O’Connor A, Carnie MB. Patients, persistence and partnership: creating and sustaining patient and family advisory councils in a Hospital Setting. JCOM. 2016;23:219–25. Fagan MB, Wong C, Morrison CRC, Lewis-O’Connor A, Carnie MB. Patients, persistence and partnership: creating and sustaining patient and family advisory councils in a Hospital Setting. JCOM. 2016;23:219–25.
3.
go back to reference Pomey M, Hihat H, Khalifa M, Lebel P, Neron A. Patient partnerships in quality improvement of healthcare services: patients’ input and challenges faced. Patient Exp J. 2015;2:29–42. Pomey M, Hihat H, Khalifa M, Lebel P, Neron A. Patient partnerships in quality improvement of healthcare services: patients’ input and challenges faced. Patient Exp J. 2015;2:29–42.
5.
go back to reference Wolf JA. A report of the Beryl Institute benchmarking study state of patient experience 2015. Southlake Texas: Beryl Institute; 2017. Wolf JA. A report of the Beryl Institute benchmarking study state of patient experience 2015. Southlake Texas: Beryl Institute; 2017.
6.
go back to reference Haycock C, Wahl C. Achieving patient and family engagement through the implementation and evaluation of advisory councils across a large health care system. Nurse Adm Q. 2013;37:242–6.CrossRef Haycock C, Wahl C. Achieving patient and family engagement through the implementation and evaluation of advisory councils across a large health care system. Nurse Adm Q. 2013;37:242–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Warren N. Involving patient and family advisors in the patient and family centered care models. MedSurg Nurs. 2012;21:232. Warren N. Involving patient and family advisors in the patient and family centered care models. MedSurg Nurs. 2012;21:232.
12.
go back to reference Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4:133–45.CrossRefPubMed Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4:133–45.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sheridan S, Schrandt S, Forsythe L, Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement (2013 inaugural panel), Hillard TS, Paez KA. The PCORI Engagement Rubric: promising practices for partnering in research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2017;15:165–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheridan S, Schrandt S, Forsythe L, Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement (2013 inaugural panel), Hillard TS, Paez KA. The PCORI Engagement Rubric: promising practices for partnering in research. Annals of Family Medicine. 2017;15:165–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Frank LB, Workman TA, Borsky A, Hilliard T, Harwell D, Fayish L. Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6:246–56. Forsythe LP, Frank LB, Workman TA, Borsky A, Hilliard T, Harwell D, Fayish L. Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6:246–56.
16.
go back to reference Perez Jolles M, Martines M, Garcia SJ, Stein GL, Mentor Parent Group Members, Thomas KC. Involving Latina/o parents in patient-centered outcomes research: contributions to research study design, implementation and outcomes. Health Expect. 2017;00:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nex.12540.CrossRef Perez Jolles M, Martines M, Garcia SJ, Stein GL, Mentor Parent Group Members, Thomas KC. Involving Latina/o parents in patient-centered outcomes research: contributions to research study design, implementation and outcomes. Health Expect. 2017;00:1–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​nex.​12540.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Holm KE, Casaburi R, Cerreta S, Gussin HA, Husbands J, Porszasz J, et al. Patient involvement in the design of a patient centered clinical trial to promote adherence to supplemental oxygen therapy in COPD. Patient Patient Cent Outcomes Res. 2016;9:271–9.CrossRef Holm KE, Casaburi R, Cerreta S, Gussin HA, Husbands J, Porszasz J, et al. Patient involvement in the design of a patient centered clinical trial to promote adherence to supplemental oxygen therapy in COPD. Patient Patient Cent Outcomes Res. 2016;9:271–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum J, McElwee N, Guise J, Santa J, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:985–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum J, McElwee N, Guise J, Santa J, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:985–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Fagan MB, Morrison CRC, Wong C, Carnie MB, Gabbai-Saldate P. Implementing a pragmatic framework for authentic patient-researcher partnerships in clinical research. J Comp Eff Res. 2016;5:297–308.CrossRefPubMed Fagan MB, Morrison CRC, Wong C, Carnie MB, Gabbai-Saldate P. Implementing a pragmatic framework for authentic patient-researcher partnerships in clinical research. J Comp Eff Res. 2016;5:297–308.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Auerbach A, Patel MS, Metlay JP, Schnipper JL, Williams MV, Robinson EJ, et al. The Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN): a learning organization focused on improving hospital care. Acad Med. 2014;89:415–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Auerbach A, Patel MS, Metlay JP, Schnipper JL, Williams MV, Robinson EJ, et al. The Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN): a learning organization focused on improving hospital care. Acad Med. 2014;89:415–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Ellis L, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learnt. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:13–21.CrossRefPubMed Forsythe LP, Ellis L, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learnt. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:13–21.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Frank L, Walker KO, Wegener N, Weisman H, Hunt G, et al. Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4:11–25.CrossRefPubMed Forsythe LP, Frank L, Walker KO, Wegener N, Weisman H, Hunt G, et al. Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4:11–25.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2008.
25.
go back to reference Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2012. Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2012.
26.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Cottrell EK, Whitcock EP, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, et al. Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comp Eff Res. 2015;5:13–9. Cottrell EK, Whitcock EP, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, et al. Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comp Eff Res. 2015;5:13–9.
Metadata
Title
Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research
Authors
James D. Harrison
Wendy G. Anderson
Maureen Fagan
Edmondo Robinson
Jeffrey Schnipper
Gina Symczak
Catherine Hanson
Martha B. Carnie
Jim Banta
Sherry Chen
Jonathan Duong
Celene Wong
Andrew D. Auerbach
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0298-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2018 Go to the issue