Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Research Article

Examination of the Applicability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire to Patients with Hand Injuries and Diseases Using Rasch Analysis

Authors: Kathrin Braitmayer, Caroline Dereskewitz, Cornelia Oberhauser, Klaus-Dieter Rudolf, Michaela Coenen

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire is the most commonly applied patient-reported outcome measure used to assess disability and functioning in clinical research and practice for patients with injuries and diseases of the upper extremities. The objective of this study was to assess whether the DASH is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure disability and functioning in patients with hand injuries and diseases using Rasch analysis.

Methods

We performed a psychometric study using data derived from two multicentre studies carried out to develop the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Hand Conditions. We analysed the data of 417 patients recruited in a clinical setting and suffering from hand injuries (e.g. finger fracture, flexor tendon injury) or diseases (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome, rhizarthrosis). We examined whether the DASH fulfilled the assumptions for its use as a measure by applying a partial credit model and testing for differential item functioning for sex and age.

Results

Bifactor analysis revealed problems with the underlying latent trait of functioning and disability. Rasch analysis raised further issues, including disordered thresholds for eight items and misfit in nine items. One item showed Differential Item Functioning for sex.

Conclusion

The study reveals that some DASH items do not fit the underlying trait that the DASH aims to measure. Further studies using Rasch analysis are needed to compare our findings with results of studies involving other target groups (e.g. patients with injuries of the upper arm and shoulder).
Literature
1.
Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(12):1094–105.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RW. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):277–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(4):575–87.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(2):84–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(11):1585–92.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Davis AM, Beaton DE, Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C, Cole D, et al. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther. 1999;12(4):269–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Bialocerkowski AE. Difficulties associated with wrist disorders–a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(4):429–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Hill S, Dziedzic KS, Ong BN. The functional and psychological impact of hand osteoarthritis. Chronic Illn. 2010;6(2):101–10.CrossRefPubMed
10.
World Health Organization. International Classification Of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
11.
Coenen M, Kus S, Rudolf KD, Muller G, Berno S, Dereskewitz C, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures capture functioning aspects and environmental factors important to individuals with injuries or disorders of the hand? J Hand Ther. 2013;26(4):332–42 (quiz 42).CrossRefPubMed
12.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities Of The Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Kus S, van de Ven-Stevens LA, Coenen M, Berno S, Kollerits B, Cieza A. What is our knowledge of functioning and disability in hand conditions based on? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(8):1326–32.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak PL, McConnell S. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? Br J Hand Ther. 2001;6(4):109–18.
15.
Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128–46.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:11–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol. 2002;29(2):401–2.PubMed
18.
SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG 3rd, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(3):537–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E. Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106(1):13–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA. Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(2):169–78.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1370–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Cheng HM, Sampaio RF, Mancini MC, Fonseca ST, Cotta RM. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH): factor analysis of the version adapted to Portuguese/Brazil. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(25):1901–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, Askary-Ashtiani A, Karimi A, Khorsandi A, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(8):749–57.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper ExtremityCollaborative G. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038–46.PubMed
25.
Cano SJ, Barrett LE, Zajicek JP, Hobart JC. Beyond the reach of traditional analyses: using Rasch to evaluate the DASH in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(2):214–22.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Rudolf KD, Kus S, Chung KC, Johnston M, LeBlanc M, Cieza A. Development of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for hand conditions—results of the World Health Organization International Consensus process. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):681–93.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kus S, Oberhauser C, Cieza A. Validation of the brief international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) core set for hand conditions. J Hand Ther. 2012;25(3):274–86 (quiz 87).CrossRefPubMed
28.
Kus S, Dereskewitz C, Wickert M, Schwab M, Eisenschenk A, Steen M, et al. Validation of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core set for hand conditions. Hand Therapy. 2011;16(3):58–66.CrossRef
29.
Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
30.
Revelle W, Zinbarg R. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):145–54.CrossRef
31.
Roscino A, Pollice A. A generalization of the polychoric correlation coefficient. In: Zani S, Cerioli A, Riani M, Vichi M, editors. Data analysis, classification and the forward search. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 135–42.CrossRef
32.
33.
34.
Reise SP. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivar Behav Res. 2012;47(5):667–96.CrossRef
35.
Buja A, Eyuboglu N. Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivar Behav Res. 1992;27(4):509–40.CrossRef
36.
Reeve BB, Fayers P. Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In: Fayers P, Hays RD, editors. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: methods of practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 55–73.
37.
Elhan AH, Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A. The Rasch measurement model. In: Franchignoni F, editor. Research issues in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Pavia: Maugeri Foundation Books; 2010. p. 89–102.
38.
Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):105–15.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–62.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2007.
43.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statisctical Computing; 2013.
44.
45.
Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J Stat Softw. 2011;39(8):1–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Examination of the Applicability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire to Patients with Hand Injuries and Diseases Using Rasch Analysis
Authors
Kathrin Braitmayer
Caroline Dereskewitz
Cornelia Oberhauser
Klaus-Dieter Rudolf
Michaela Coenen
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0212-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2017 Go to the issue

Original Research Article

Development and Content Validity of the Statin Experience Assessment Questionnaire (SEAQ)©

Original Research Article

What’s Important to the Patient? Informational Needs of Patients Making Decisions About Hepatitis C Treatment

Original Research Article

Development of a Patient-Reported Palliative Care-Specific Health Classification System: The POS-E

Current Opinion

Moving from Patient Advocacy to Partnership: A Long and Bumpy Road

Current Opinion

Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges

Systematic Review

Perceived Benefits and Factors that Influence the Ability to Establish and Maintain Patient Support Groups in Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits