Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Research Article

A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care

Authors: Patricia M. Herman, Maia Ingram, Charles E. Cunningham, Heather Rimas, Lucy Murrieta, Kenneth Schachter, Jill Guernsey de Zapien, Scott C. Carvajal

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Consideration of patient preferences regarding delivery of mental health services within primary care may greatly improve access and quality of care for the many who could benefit from those services.

Objectives

This project evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of adding a consumer-products design method to qualitative methods implemented within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework.

Research Design

Discrete-choice conjoint experiment (DCE) added to systematic focus group data collection and analysis.

Subjects

Focus group data were collected from 64 patients of a Federally-Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a predominantly low-income Hispanic population. A total of 604 patients in the waiting rooms of the FQHC responded to the DCE.

Measures

The DCE contained 15 choice tasks that each asked respondents to choose between three mental health services options described by the levels of two (of eight) attributes based on themes that emerged from focus group data.

Results

The addition of the DCE was found to be feasible and useful in providing distinct information on relative patient preferences compared with the focus group analyses alone. According to market simulations, the package of mental health services guided by the results of the DCE was preferred by patients.

Conclusions

Unique patterns of patient preferences were uncovered by the DCE and these findings were useful in identifying pragmatic solutions to better address the mental health service needs of this population. However, for this resource-intensive method to be adopted more broadly, the scale of the primary care setting and/or scope of the issue addressed have to be relatively large.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Croghan TW, Brown JD. Integrating mental health treatment into the patient-centered medical home. Rockville (MD): Mathematical Policy Research; 2009. Croghan TW, Brown JD. Integrating mental health treatment into the patient-centered medical home. Rockville (MD): Mathematical Policy Research; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Kessler R, Stafford D. Primary care is the de facto mental health system. New York: Springer; 2008.CrossRef Kessler R, Stafford D. Primary care is the de facto mental health system. New York: Springer; 2008.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Caldwell A, Couture A, Nowotny H. Closing the mental health gap: eliminating disparities in treatment for Latinos. Kansas City: Mattie Rhodes Center; 2008. Caldwell A, Couture A, Nowotny H. Closing the mental health gap: eliminating disparities in treatment for Latinos. Kansas City: Mattie Rhodes Center; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Arcury TA, Quandt SA. Delivery of health services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:345–63.CrossRefPubMed Arcury TA, Quandt SA. Delivery of health services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:345–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Surgeon General. Mental health: culture, race, ethnicity. A supplement to mental health: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001. Surgeon General. Mental health: culture, race, ethnicity. A supplement to mental health: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.
7.
go back to reference Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):629–40.CrossRefPubMed Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):629–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference González HM, Vega WA, Williams DR, Tarraf W, West BT, Neighbors HW. Depression care in the United States: too little for too few. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(1):37–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral González HM, Vega WA, Williams DR, Tarraf W, West BT, Neighbors HW. Depression care in the United States: too little for too few. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(1):37–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
11.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Chapter 5. Patient centeredness: national healthcare disparities report, 2010. Rockville : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Chapter 5. Patient centeredness: national healthcare disparities report, 2010. Rockville : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
12.
go back to reference Berry LL, Beckham D, Dettman A, Mead R. Toward a strategy of patient-centered access to primary care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(10):1406–15.CrossRefPubMed Berry LL, Beckham D, Dettman A, Mead R. Toward a strategy of patient-centered access to primary care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(10):1406–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sorel E, Everett A. Psychiatry and primary care integration: challenges and opportunities. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):28–30.CrossRefPubMed Sorel E, Everett A. Psychiatry and primary care integration: challenges and opportunities. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):28–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lin P, Campbell DG, Chaney EF, Liu C-F, Heagerty P, Felker BL, et al. The influence of patient preference on depression treatment in primary care. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(2):164–73.CrossRefPubMed Lin P, Campbell DG, Chaney EF, Liu C-F, Heagerty P, Felker BL, et al. The influence of patient preference on depression treatment in primary care. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(2):164–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cunningham CE, Deal K, Rimas H, Campbell H, Russell A, Henderson J, et al. Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care. Patient. 2008;1(4):317–30.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham CE, Deal K, Rimas H, Campbell H, Russell A, Henderson J, et al. Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care. Patient. 2008;1(4):317–30.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55(5):729–35.CrossRef Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55(5):729–35.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Marshall D, Bridges JF, Hauber B, Cameron R, Donnalley L, Fyie K, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.CrossRefPubMed Marshall D, Bridges JF, Hauber B, Cameron R, Donnalley L, Fyie K, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
20.
go back to reference Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Aisenberg E, Hay J. Using conjoint analysis to assess depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos. Psychiatric Serv. 2004;55(8):934–6.CrossRef Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Aisenberg E, Hay J. Using conjoint analysis to assess depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos. Psychiatric Serv. 2004;55(8):934–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Hay J, Zhang L, Tang LQ, Green JM, et al. Effectiveness of collaborative care in addressing depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos. Psychiatric Serv. 2010;61(11):1112–8.CrossRef Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Hay J, Zhang L, Tang LQ, Green JM, et al. Effectiveness of collaborative care in addressing depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos. Psychiatric Serv. 2010;61(11):1112–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Okumura Y, Sakamoto S. Depression treatment preferences among Japanese undergraduates: using conjoint analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012;58(2):195–203.CrossRefPubMed Okumura Y, Sakamoto S. Depression treatment preferences among Japanese undergraduates: using conjoint analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012;58(2):195–203.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wittink MN, Morales KH, Cary M, Gallo JJ, Bartels SJ. Towards personalizing treatment for depression. Patient. 2013;6(1):35–43.CrossRefPubMed Wittink MN, Morales KH, Cary M, Gallo JJ, Bartels SJ. Towards personalizing treatment for depression. Patient. 2013;6(1):35–43.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bell RA, Paterniti DA, Azari R, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Rochlen AB, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):198–205.CrossRefPubMed Bell RA, Paterniti DA, Azari R, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Rochlen AB, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):198–205.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zimmermann TM, Clouth J, Elosge M, Heurich M, Schneider E, Wilhelm S, et al. Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: a choice-based conjoint analysis study. J Affect Disord. 2013;148(2):210–9.CrossRefPubMed Zimmermann TM, Clouth J, Elosge M, Heurich M, Schneider E, Wilhelm S, et al. Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: a choice-based conjoint analysis study. J Affect Disord. 2013;148(2):210–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 2nd ed. Madison: Research Publishers; 2010. Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 2nd ed. Madison: Research Publishers; 2010.
28.
go back to reference Ryan M, Scott D, Reeves C, Bate A, Van Teijlingen E, Russell E, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–186.CrossRefPubMed Ryan M, Scott D, Reeves C, Bate A, Van Teijlingen E, Russell E, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–186.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1659–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1659–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Payne J, Bettman J, Johnson E. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.CrossRef Payne J, Bettman J, Johnson E. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hsee CK, Loewenstein GF, Blount S, Bazerman MH. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(5):576.CrossRef Hsee CK, Loewenstein GF, Blount S, Bazerman MH. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(5):576.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F, Hauber A. Patient preference methods: a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connect. 2007;13(6):4–7. Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F, Hauber A. Patient preference methods: a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connect. 2007;13(6):4–7.
33.
go back to reference Bridges J. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(4):213–24.PubMed Bridges J. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(4):213–24.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19(1):173–202.CrossRefPubMed Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19(1):173–202.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ingram M, Murrietta L, de Zapien JG, Herman PM, Carvajal SC. Community health workers as focus group facilitators: A participatory action research method to improve behavioral health services for farmworkers in a primary care setting. Action Res. 2015;13(1):48–64.CrossRef Ingram M, Murrietta L, de Zapien JG, Herman PM, Carvajal SC. Community health workers as focus group facilitators: A participatory action research method to improve behavioral health services for farmworkers in a primary care setting. Action Res. 2015;13(1):48–64.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ingram M, Schachter KA, Guernsey de Zapien J, Herman PM, Carvajal SC. Using participatory methods to enhance patient-centred mental health care in a federally qualified community health center serving a Mexican American farmworker community. Health Expect. doi:10.1111/hex.12284 (Epub 10 Oct 2014). Ingram M, Schachter KA, Guernsey de Zapien J, Herman PM, Carvajal SC. Using participatory methods to enhance patient-centred mental health care in a federally qualified community health center serving a Mexican American farmworker community. Health Expect. doi:10.​1111/​hex.​12284 (Epub 10 Oct 2014).
37.
go back to reference Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. FORUM: Qual Soc Res. 2012;13(1):30. Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. FORUM: Qual Soc Res. 2012;13(1):30.
38.
go back to reference Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M. What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’of patient preferences. Health Expect. 2006;9(3):275–84.CrossRefPubMed Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M. What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’of patient preferences. Health Expect. 2006;9(3):275–84.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.CrossRefPubMed Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Lenk PJ, DeSarbo WS, Green PE, Young MR. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Mark Sci. 1996;15(2):173–91.CrossRef Lenk PJ, DeSarbo WS, Green PE, Young MR. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Mark Sci. 1996;15(2):173–91.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sawtooth Software I. The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation version 5.0 technical paper. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, Inc.; 2009. Sawtooth Software I. The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation version 5.0 technical paper. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, Inc.; 2009.
43.
go back to reference Halme M, Kallio M. Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;214(1):160–7.CrossRef Halme M, Kallio M. Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;214(1):160–7.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Orme BK. SSI Web V6.6 software for web interviewing and conjoint analysis. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, Inc.; 2009. Orme BK. SSI Web V6.6 software for web interviewing and conjoint analysis. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, Inc.; 2009.
45.
go back to reference Orme B, Huber J. Improving the value of conjoint simulations. Mark Res. 2000;12(4):12–20. Orme B, Huber J. Improving the value of conjoint simulations. Mark Res. 2000;12(4):12–20.
46.
go back to reference Huber J, Orme BK, Miller R. Dealing with product similarity in conjoint simulations. In: Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F, editors. Conjoint measurement: methods and applications. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 347–62.CrossRef Huber J, Orme BK, Miller R. Dealing with product similarity in conjoint simulations. In: Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F, editors. Conjoint measurement: methods and applications. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 347–62.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Herman PM, Ingram M, Rimas H, Carvajal S, Cunningham CE. Patient preferences of a low-income Hispanic population for mental health services in primary care. Adm Policy Ment Health (Epub 26 Sep 2015). Herman PM, Ingram M, Rimas H, Carvajal S, Cunningham CE. Patient preferences of a low-income Hispanic population for mental health services in primary care. Adm Policy Ment Health (Epub 26 Sep 2015).
48.
go back to reference Carvajal SC, Rosales C, Rubio-Goldsmith R, Sabo S, Ingram M, McClelland DJ, et al. The border community and immigration stress scale: a preliminary examination of a community responsive measure in two southwest samples. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013;15(2):427–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carvajal SC, Rosales C, Rubio-Goldsmith R, Sabo S, Ingram M, McClelland DJ, et al. The border community and immigration stress scale: a preliminary examination of a community responsive measure in two southwest samples. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013;15(2):427–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research exploring the meanings of health and illness. J Health Psychol. 1998;3(3):329–48.CrossRefPubMed Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research exploring the meanings of health and illness. J Health Psychol. 1998;3(3):329–48.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Caruso EM, Rahnev DA, Banaji MR. Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(1):128–37.CrossRef Caruso EM, Rahnev DA, Banaji MR. Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(1):128–37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care
Authors
Patricia M. Herman
Maia Ingram
Charles E. Cunningham
Heather Rimas
Lucy Murrieta
Kenneth Schachter
Jill Guernsey de Zapien
Scott C. Carvajal
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0155-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.