Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Systematic Review

Tools for Assessment of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and Association with Patient-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Authors: Nashwa Masnoon, Sepehr Shakib, Lisa Kalisch-Ellett, Gillian E. Caughey

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are tools and criteria in the literature aimed at distinguishing between appropriate and inappropriate medicines use. However, many have not been externally validated with regard to patient-related outcomes, potentially limiting their use in clinical practice.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review to summarise (1) available prescribing appropriateness assessment tools and criteria, and (2) their associations with patient-related outcomes (external validity).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Informit (Health Collection) databases to screen for articles in English that examined (1) tools to assess the appropriateness of prescribing and (2) associations of tools with patient-related outcomes, published between 2000 and 2016, without any limits placed on the study design, participant age or setting.

Results

After screening 1710 articles, removing duplicates and shortlisting relevant articles, 42 prescribing assessment tools were identified. Out of the 42 tools, 78.6% (n = 33) provided guidance around stopping inappropriate medications, 28.6% (n = 12) around starting appropriate medications, 61.9% (n = 26) were explicit (criteria based) and 31.0% (n = 13) had been externally validated, with hospitalisation being the most commonly used patient-related outcome (n = 9, 21.4%).

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review highlight the need for evidence-based and externally validated tools, which combine the different aspects of medication management to optimise patient-related outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017067233.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Vitry AI, Zhang Y. Quality of Australian clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with multiple comorbid conditions. Med J Aust. 2008;189(7):360–5.PubMed Vitry AI, Zhang Y. Quality of Australian clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with multiple comorbid conditions. Med J Aust. 2008;189(7):360–5.PubMed
12.
17.
go back to reference Pollock M, Bazaldua OV, Dobbie AE. Appropriate prescribing of medications: an eight-step approach. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):231–6.PubMed Pollock M, Bazaldua OV, Dobbie AE. Appropriate prescribing of medications: an eight-step approach. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):231–6.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, et al. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.PubMedCrossRef Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, et al. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.PubMedCrossRef
28.
30.
go back to reference Zhan C, Sangl J, Bierman AS, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication use in the community-dwelling elderly: findings from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. JAMA. 2001;286(22):2823–9.PubMedCrossRef Zhan C, Sangl J, Bierman AS, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication use in the community-dwelling elderly: findings from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. JAMA. 2001;286(22):2823–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kojima T, Mizukami K, Tomita N, et al. Screening tool for older persons’ appropriate prescriptions for Japanese: Report of the Japan Geriatrics Society Working Group on “Guidelines for Medical Treatment and its Safety in the Elderly”. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(9):983–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12890.PubMedCrossRef Kojima T, Mizukami K, Tomita N, et al. Screening tool for older persons’ appropriate prescriptions for Japanese: Report of the Japan Geriatrics Society Working Group on “Guidelines for Medical Treatment and its Safety in the Elderly”. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(9):983–1001. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ggi.​12890.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ruths S, Straand J, Nygaard HA. Multidisciplinary medication review in nursing home residents: what are the most significant drug-related problems? The Bergen District Nursing Home (BEDNURS) study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(3):176–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ruths S, Straand J, Nygaard HA. Multidisciplinary medication review in nursing home residents: what are the most significant drug-related problems? The Bergen District Nursing Home (BEDNURS) study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(3):176–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Haque RM. ARMOR: a tool to evaluate polypharmacy in elderly persons. Ann Long-Term Care. 2009;17(6):26–30. Haque RM. ARMOR: a tool to evaluate polypharmacy in elderly persons. Ann Long-Term Care. 2009;17(6):26–30.
48.
go back to reference Lee SS, Schwemm AK, Reist J, et al. Pharmacists’ and pharmacy students’ ability to identify drug-related problems using TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review). Am J Pharmaceut Educ. 2009;73(3):52.CrossRef Lee SS, Schwemm AK, Reist J, et al. Pharmacists’ and pharmacy students’ ability to identify drug-related problems using TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review). Am J Pharmaceut Educ. 2009;73(3):52.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM, et al. Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. CMAJ. 1997;156(3):385–91.PubMedPubMedCentral McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM, et al. Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. CMAJ. 1997;156(3):385–91.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2016. 2016. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2016. 2016.
54.
go back to reference Naugler CT, Brymer C, Stolee P, et al. Development and validation of an improving prescribing in the elderly tool. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;7(2):103–7.PubMed Naugler CT, Brymer C, Stolee P, et al. Development and validation of an improving prescribing in the elderly tool. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;7(2):103–7.PubMed
58.
go back to reference Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, et al. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(10):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, et al. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(10):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Frankenthal D, Lerman Y, Kalendaryev E, et al. Intervention with the screening tool of older persons potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria in elderly residents of a chronic geriatric facility: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(9):1658–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12993.PubMedCrossRef Frankenthal D, Lerman Y, Kalendaryev E, et al. Intervention with the screening tool of older persons potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria in elderly residents of a chronic geriatric facility: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(9):1658–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jgs.​12993.PubMedCrossRef
73.
76.
go back to reference Stockl KM, Le L, Zhang S, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(1):e1–10.PubMed Stockl KM, Le L, Zhang S, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(1):e1–10.PubMed
89.
go back to reference Pasina L, Djade CD, Lucca U, et al. Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive and functional status in a cohort of hospitalized elderly: comparison of the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale and anticholinergic risk scale: results from the REPOSI study. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(2):103–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-012-0044-x.PubMedCrossRef Pasina L, Djade CD, Lucca U, et al. Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive and functional status in a cohort of hospitalized elderly: comparison of the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale and anticholinergic risk scale: results from the REPOSI study. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(2):103–12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40266-012-0044-x.PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference Wang KCM, Veluswamy R. Evidence-based strategies to reduce polypharmacy: a review. OA Elderly Med. 2013;1:6. Wang KCM, Veluswamy R. Evidence-based strategies to reduce polypharmacy: a review. OA Elderly Med. 2013;1:6.
122.
go back to reference Hill-Taylor B, Walsh KA, Stewart S, et al. Effectiveness of the STOPP/START (Screening Tool of Older persons’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(2):158–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12372.PubMedCrossRef Hill-Taylor B, Walsh KA, Stewart S, et al. Effectiveness of the STOPP/START (Screening Tool of Older persons’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(2):158–69. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jcpt.​12372.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tools for Assessment of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and Association with Patient-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Authors
Nashwa Masnoon
Sepehr Shakib
Lisa Kalisch-Ellett
Gillian E. Caughey
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0516-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Drugs & Aging 1/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.